Error message

  • Deprecated function: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_display has a deprecated constructor in require_once() (line 3080 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_many_to_one_helper has a deprecated constructor in require_once() (line 113 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/modules/ctools/ctools.module).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2386 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

News

I've seen 2027's new robot vacuums — here are 3 major trends set to level-up their cleaning, from drop-down suction boosters to… steam? - Saturday, September 12, 2026 - 22:00

The robot vacuum market is continuing to move at breakneck pace, with most brands releasing multiple models each year. Despite the proliferation of new vacs hitting the market, there are often clear feature trends that pop up across multiple brands at around the same time. I got a preview of the new fleet of flagship robot vacuums at IFA 2026 last week, and I was interested to see what the bot brands had focused on for their 2027 models.

Three key themes emerged almost immediately, and I've rounded them up for you below. Which of these trends will see their way into any upcoming updates to our best robot vacuum? I'll be watching with interest, and look forward to seeing how the new features stand up in real-world testing. For now, let's dive into what's heading your way in the world of robot vacuums.

Step it up

For a few years now, robovac makers have been focused on finding ways to get their bots over chunky room thresholds. It makes sense: in the UK at least, old homes with uneven floors and tall door frames aren't uncommon, and if a robot can't make it over a certain threshold, and that threshold is in the wrong place, it can curtail the vac's journey quite dramatically.

Most of the main brands now have models with secondary wheels and/or a special chassis to allow for step clearance, and the incoming fleet of flagships have especially lofty aspirations.

Dreame's new bot (in the video above) can clear single steps up to 5cm, or double steps up to 10cm. That was impressive in the context of last year's flagships, but this year it's been well and truly outdone. DJI's Romo 2 can handle a single hop of 4cm and a double hop of up to 8.5cm. Roborock's latest flagship, the Saros 20 Flow Complete, can go even higher: it can manage double-layer thresholds of up to 8.8cm. Where will it end?

Getting steamy

On the wet-cleaning front, the big trend is for pre-treating dried-on stains by spraying them with moisture before the mopping begins. Brands have approached this in different ways.

Dreame has opted to include a heating element in its Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete, so it can blast hard floors with steam at 180°C. Theoretically, it should be very effective at lifting dirt, but there are some drawbacks.

The steam-creating process is very energy-intensive — you can only use it for zone cleaning, and you should expect your bot to need a recharge afterwards. The demo (video below) wasn't quite as steamy as I was expecting, either.

Ecovacs' effort in this area is the most pared-back. Its DEEBOT X12S OmniCyclone will spray dried-on stains — it doesn't specify with what, so I assume it's just water — to give it time to loosen before going in with its mop. It calls this function the "FocusJet stain spray".

I can see the Ecovacs approach making a difference, but the method I have most hope for is iRobot's. The Roomba Max 875 emits a "heated mist" to pre-treat muck on hard flooring. Since there's no active heating element on the robot itself, use of the function has minimal impact on battery life. Plus, in the demo (shown above), it was kicking out a good amount of mist.

Rolling on by

The suction spec wars don't seem to be quite over yet, but brands are finding clever ways to increase particle pickup without boosting suction. The main solution I saw at IFA was a "seal" between the suction inlet and the floor, which intensifies the suction.

DJI's second-gen robot vacuum, the Romo 2, has a "pressure plate" that lowers to improve pickup of ground-in dirt. iRobot's new flagship also has a frame that can be lowered to improve pickup — although based on the demo I saw, it wasn't dropping quite as low as I'd expect.

(Image credit: Future)

Dyson has a slightly different approach in its R1 and R2 Nurovi robovacs. Rather than sealing down the entire suction area — which could cause large particles to snowplough around the seal rather than being sucked up — these bots have a "Twin-capture system". There's a large, open brush bar area for chunky debris, and above it is a separate area for the fine dust. The latter is sealed down to the floor to concentrate the suction.

(Image credit: Future)

Do you think robot vacuum-makers are directing their efforts in the right areas? Is there a feature you'd still like to see? Let us know in the comments section.

The tone of Diablo 5 is 'really doubling down on darkness' say the devs — 'I think that's really the tone, the atmosphere' - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 00:47
  • Devs say that they're "really doubling down on darkness" with Diablo 5's setting
  • This will build on Diablo 4's bleakness and darkness
  • And continue to contrast the relative vibrancy of Diablo 3

After the somewhat vibrancy of Diablo 3 that some fans raised an eyebrow at, the bleak darkness and misery of Diablo 4 was a welcome change of vibes and atmosphere for many players — and it sounds like the developers are going to continue this into Diablo 5.

During the Diablo 5 — Forging the Next Era panel, which we watched at BlizzCon 2026 in Anaheim, some of the game's devs spoke openly about the dark and bleak setting that Diablo 5 will have.

"I think that's really the tone, the atmosphere," said John Mueller, senior art director. "We're really doubling down on darkness, and what this means for the art team is we really get to explore all of what we learned from Diablo 4 and expand on it further. You know, that desolation that we're going to see in the world is really the setting for the survivors of this story [in Diablo 5]."

This is something that I'm absolutely here for; Diablo games thrive and are at their bleakest best when they embrace a dark and miserable tone and atmosphere, and help to cement the sense of place Sanctuary has, as well as the overarching richness of the story and narrative.

This doubling down, to the extent of embracing a setting of defeat and one where Sanctuary has fallen, already makes for a compelling starting point that I can't wait for.

However, narrative director Jennifer Hepler went on to add that in the process of "making Sanctuary so, so dark, [and] trying to double down on this darkness of Diablo winning in this apocalyptic setting; we still need to make Sanctuary a place that's worth defending."

So there's a balancing act in play here, then, with the darkness and hopelessness of the setting being somewhat offset by the devs still wanting to make Sanctuary a "place that you want to save."

This narrative conflict and tension is something I'm really looking forward to properly and fully when the game releases in Spring 2029.

A Diablo 5 new class has already been revealed with the Plague Knight being 'a walking death' across the battlefield — while two returning classes have also been confirmed - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 01:34
  • Diablo 5 devs confirmed a new class for the game at BlizzCon 2026
  • The Plague Knight will spread and then consume disease across the battlefield to their advantage
  • Two returning classes are already confirmed as well

Three Diablo 5 classes have already been confirmed, and the developers behind the game have even shed light on a brand-new one coming to the game during the Diablo 5 — Forging the Next Era panel, which we watched at BlizzCon 2026 in Anaheim.

"The Plague Knight is the first new class that will be joining Diablo 5," said Joe Shely, game director. "This is a heavily armored class; it's a walking death."

Adding more detail, Shely said, "You're going to be roaming the battlefield, spreading disease and consuming it for power." This sounds incredibly deadly, poison-y, and downright unclean.

As well as confirming that the Demon Hunter and Monk classes will be returning for Diablo 5, Shely also added that "Diablo 5 is going to launch with more classes than ever before, and I don't just mean more classes than another Diablo game at ship. I mean more classes total."

The returning classes are likely to be very well received by the community

Finishing the description of the classes, Shely reinforced the key characteristics of Diablo classes, saying that "they're approachable. You can jump in; you can immediately have an exciting time playing them. But there's also deep ARPG mastery there, and a multitude of builds to explore."

I expect more classes and more class info to drop in the coming months as we hear more about the game in the long run-up to its release in Spring 2029.

Google Health's mistakes are a grave warning for Apple’s new AI-powered Health app - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 03:00

Any users of the best Fitbit devices that were watching Apple’s iPhone Duo event yesterday might have felt a chill of all-too-familiar dread during the company’s glitzy keynote presentation.

That’s not because Apple announced some sort of killer smartwatch feature that will bury the Fitbit range alive. No, it’s because viewers got to see Apple’s new plans for its Health app, which now comes with an AI-powered makeover that will likely stir up some painful emotions for many Fitbit fans.

Of course, adding AI into an app doesn’t automatically doom it. But the parallels between Apple Health and the Google Health app that Fitbit users have been lumped with — with all its wild hallucinations and crazy wellbeing inaccuracies — is undeniable.

Indeed, if the Fitbit experience is anything to go by, there’s a risk that Apple customers could be in for a bumpy ride.

Coming to your iPhone

(Image credit: Future)

Why might Fitbit fans be ringing a Google Health-shaped alarm bell? Well, Google-owned Fitbit announced a total overhaul of the companion app for its wearables back in May 2026 — and it was almost immediately unpopular.

The rebranded app was accused of being “unbelievably bad” amid missing features and confusing user interface decisions that made the app much less enjoyable to use than the one it replaced.

But that was just the tip of the iceberg. As the weeks and months rolled on, social media started overflowing with user complaints directly squarely at one target: Google Health’s AI assistant.

This tool is meant to analyze your wellbeing data and make suggestions on ways you can improve your fitness and live a healthier life. The problem, though, is that the AI seemed to frequently go off the rails.

I’ve written about how Google’s AI has been giving people “unhinged” fitness advice, feeding them “nonstop lies” and spinning up completely fictional food-tracking metrics. It’s a real concern and has proven to be a tremendous source of frustration to anyone unfortunate enough to have to use it.

And now with the Apple Health revamp, a similar feature might be coming to your iPhone.

An anxious wait

(Image credit: Future)

In any other app, patchy performance like this might just be a slight irritation. But in an app like Google Health, where the AI is making suggestions that could directly affect your physical wellbeing, the effect is much more serious.

Can Apple escape such problems with its own AI revamp? I’m not sure, despite Apple's excellent track record and cautious implementation of LLMs. After all, Apple tried to go its own way with Apple Intelligence but fell so far behind the competition that it had to enlist the help of — you guessed it – Google.

That means that the same AI models that have messed up Google Health so badly are now propping up Apple Intelligence, and with it, Apple Health.

That said, there’s no guarantee that Apple Health will go the same way as Google Health. While Google’s AI is powering many of the features inside the likes of Apple Intelligence and Siri AI, we don’t know exactly how that’s going to work in Apple’s Health app do-over. Has Apple tweaked Google’s models to its own tastes or imported them wholesale?

(Image credit: Future)

I’d hope that Apple has made some modifications of its own. Apple's website states that 'all of our health innovations are subject to rigorous scientific validation and are developed with clinical experts from start to finish'.

Not only that, but the company is extremely hot on user privacy and security, and what could be more vulnerable than your health data? With almost every health-related feature that it has introduced in recent years, Apple has emphasized the steps it has taken to encrypt, protect and otherwise lock down your sensitive wellbeing information.

Considering that Google could be perceived to be, relatively speaking, far more lax about user privacy, I’d be shocked if Apple hadn’t taken a peek under the hood to ensure that its Health AI is as secure and reliable as possible. It would have been hard for Apple not to notice the furor that Google Health has caused Fitbit fans.

There’s no way Apple would want that kind of feedback from its own users, so I’m hoping it’s made some adjustments to ensure that its own AI is a little less eccentric, shall we say, than Google’s.

We’re not going to know for sure until the new Health app becomes available, which won’t be until 'later this year,' Apple says. Until that happens, it’s going to be an anxious wait for any Apple user aware of the carnage suffered by their Fitbit-wielding colleagues.

I Pretended to Be on Vacation to Test This Rental-Ready Smart Lock - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 06:00
Lockly released a new type of smart lock, with a stylish keypad and features made specifically for rentals, vacation homes and Airbnbs. I tried it all.
Save $200 on Roborock’s Brand-New Robot Vac and Mop With This Launch Deal - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 06:03
This model offers incredibly powerful suction and supports all the major smart home platforms.
Casetify’s Accessories for Your Phone, Tablet and More Are 15% Off With This Code - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 08:26
Protect your new iPhone with a stylish Casetify case at a discount.
How to watch Man Utd vs Man City: Live streams, TV channels, team news for Premier League 2026/27 - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 08:30
  • Man Utd vs Man City: Sunday, September 13 at 4.30pm BST / 11.30am ET / 1.30am AEST (September 14)
  • Streams: Sky Sports (UK), Peacock (US)
  • Outside the UK? Use NordVPN to unblock your streaming account

Watch Man Utd vs Man City in the Premier League 2026/27 season, as these two fierce adversaries renew hostilities at Old Trafford, where the visitors will be looking to make it four top-flight wins from four to start the campaign.

Enzo Maresca oversaw a 3-0 defeat by Arsenal in the Community Shield, but he boasts a 100 percent record in the Premier League as City boss. A 1-0 victory over Coventry last weekend out was closer than many imagined, but it ensured they remain level on points with Arsenal at the summit of the standings early on. A 2-0 midweek victory over Porto took Erling Haaland to five goals in all competitions.

Man Utd have had a more mixed start. A 2-0 loss to Hull was followed by a 5-2 triumph over Ipswich, before a last-gasp equalizer from Everton left Man Utd rueing their profligacy. The Red Devils have been inconsistent up to now as Michael Carrick attempts to get them closer to the title, but a 4-0 gubbing of Sabah in the Champions League should help morale. Benjamin Sesko has two in his past two games.

Man City will see this as an opportunity to remind their adversaries that they remain Manchester's pre-eminent side even after Pep Guardiola's exit. But Man Utd tended to raise their game for this fixture, most notably in a 2-0 victory in Carrick's first game in charge in January.

Here's how to watch Man Utd vs Man City in the 2026/27 Premier League from anywhere in the world.

Man Utd vs Man City team news

Man Utd XI: Lammens; Dalot, Maguire, Martinez, Dorgu; Tielemans, Mainoo; Mbeumo, Fernandes, Rashford; Cunha.

Man City XI: Donnarumma; Nunes, Dias, Guehi, Gvardiol; Anderson, Fernandez; Foden, Cherki, Semenyo; Haaland.

How to watch Man Utd vs Man City from anywhere

A VPN is handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it's back in your home country, so you can unlock your usual service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and you can get our exclusive deal too...

NordVPN deal: Get 3 months extra FREE

Boasting lightning fast speeds, great features, streaming power, and class-leading security, NordVPN is our #1 VPN.

✅ 30-day money-back guarantee
✅ Up to 75% off usual price
✅ Includes 3 extra months for free

Use Nord to unblock your usual streaming service and watch the Man Utd vs Man City live stream with our exclusive deal.View Deal

How to watch Man Utd vs Man City live streams in the USA

Soccer fans in the US can watch Man Utd vs Man City in the Premier League on Peacock.

Peacock Premium plans start from $12.99 a month, or $129.99 a year.

Outside of the US? Use a VPN whilst you're traveling away from home to unlock your stream. We like NordVPN best.

How to watch a Man Utd vs Man City live stream in the UK

(Image credit: Future)

Sky Sports is broadcasting Man Utd vs Man City in the UK on its Premier League and Main Event channels.

Packages cost £35 per month for new customers, or £22 per month if you already have a Sky TV contract. The Sky Go app lets you watch on your laptop, mobile or tablet.

Fans can also tune in using a NOW Sports Membership, with 24-hour passes costing £14.99.

Not in the UK for Man Utd vs Man City? Use NordVPN to access your usual Premier League streams.

How to watch Man Utd vs Man City live streams in Canada

Fubo is the Premier League's broadcast partner in Canada and it has live coverage of Man Utd vs Man City.

Prices start from CA$31.49 per month for Fubo's Sports Monthly package. However, the best option right now is the Quarterly Package which costs just CA$27.99 CA$14.99 for each of the first three months. You can also watch Fubo's content if you have a select DAZN subscription in Canada.

Not in Canada? Use NordVPN if you're away from home, in order to tap into your preferred coverage from anywhere.

How to watch Man Utd vs Man City live streams in Australia

(Image credit: free)

A Man Utd vs Man City live stream is available in Australia on Stan Sport.

You can pick up a Stan Sport subscription for as little as AU$29.99 per month for the basic plan containing adds. That price consists of the AU$9.99 Stan subscription fee plus the Sport add-on for AU$20.

Outside of Oz? You can use a VPN to access your usual Premier League coverage. We recommend NordVPN.

What is the Man Utd vs Man City start time?

Man Utd vs Man City kicks off at 4.30pm BST / 11.30am ET / 8.30am PT on Sunday, 13 September.

If you are in Australia, the game will be broadcast at 1.30am AEST on Monday, 14 September.

What is the Man Utd vs Man City head-to-head?

Of the previous 198 meetings between the sides, United have won 81 to City's 63, with 54 draws.

It was one win apiece last season, with City winning 3-0 at home in September 2025, before United got revenge with a 2-0 victory at Old Trafford in January.

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

EU regulations have revealed how big this year's iPhone 18 Pro battery upgrade was — and US buyers get one spec tweak on the Pro Max model - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 08:30
  • Both the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max get battery bumps
  • The increases are now confirmed in EU labeling
  • In the US, the iPhone 18 Pro Max sticks with a Qualcomm modem

Apple doesn't always publish full spec sheets for its devices, but if you were wondering just what the battery capacity of the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max were, we now know — thanks to European Union regulations demanding that these details are made public.

Energy labels applied to the phones in the EU (via Android Headlines) show that the iPhone 18 Pro is fitted with a 4,056 mAh battery, while the iPhone 18 Pro Max has a 5,391 mAh battery inside. Those represent 1.45% and 11.8% increases, respectively, on the models from the previous year.

Apple describes the battery bump on the iPhone 18 Pro Max as "the largest increase in battery life ever" on an iPhone, and says you can get 45 hours of video playback between recharges. For the iPhone 18 Pro, it's 36 hours.

One small wrinkle: these capacities refer to iPhones sold in the EU, so these models will be ones with a physical SIM card slot. The handsets sold in the US and some other regions are eSIM-only, so may have even better batteries inside.

Something different

This is true, iOS 27 has two identifiers for the device: V64 for iPhone 18 Pro Max with a Qualcomm modem, V64s for iPhone 18 Pro Max with C2 modem. https://t.co/d2WdppoI6cSeptember 11, 2026

There's more specs digging over at MacRumors, where a tip shared on social media suggests that every iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max handset has Apple's own C2 modem inside — except for the iPhone 18 Pro Max models sold in the US, which uses a Qualcomm chip.

The difference has apparently been revealed in code for iOS 27 — though for the moment it's not confirmed (pre-orders aren't shipping until Friday, September 18) — and it's most likely the Qualcomm Snapdragon X85 modem.

There shouldn't be any noticeable variation in performance between the Apple C2 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X85, though Apple says the C2 offers faster speeds than its previous C1X. It's not clear why the Qualcomm chip is hanging around in this one model, but it may be to do with contractual obligations.

We'll be bringing you our thoughts on these phones in the coming days and weeks, including the foldable Apple iPhone Duo. And if you're wondering where the standard iPhone 18 is, it's expected in March with the iPhone 18e and iPhone Air 2.

What is the release date for Reacher season 4 episode 8 on Prime Video? - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 09:00

Just as soon as we've got our boy back on the TV, he's set to disappear again. Reacher season 4 officially ends this week, but not without an epic showdown as a fitting farewell.

Some fans argue that the political espionage plot at the center of new episodes has come too far away from what a Jack Reacher story should be... and to an extent, I agree. We've definitely all forgotten that Reacher is intended to be light-hearted and silly, but a fresh take on a worn format is often a necessity.

Now we're at the end, when does Reacher season 4 episode 8 arrive on Prime Video?

What time can I watch Reacher season 4 episode 8 on Prime Video?

We're expecting episode 8 of Reacher season 4 to be available on September 16 at 12am PT / 3am ET in the US.

Internationally, look out for the below times:

  • US – 12am PT / 3am ET
  • Canada – 12am PT / 3am ET
  • UK – 8am BST
  • India – 12:30pm IST
  • Singapore – 3pm SGT
  • Australia – 5pm AEST
  • New Zealand – 7pm NZST
When do new episodes of Reacher season 4 come out?

(Image credit: Prime Video)

They won't. As I mentioned up top, Reacher season 4 draws to a close with this week's chapter, so there won't be any more entries to enjoy once this season's finale has premiered on September 16.

However, the Reacher season 4 finale coincides with the day that all episodes of its first spin-off Neagley lands on Prime Video. So, if you want to continue immersing yourself in this world, you'll be able to do so.

Prusa CORE One+ INDX 8-Tool 3D printer review: This beast makes rival multicolor 3D printers feel slow - Sunday, September 13, 2026 - 09:15

Prusa is at the heart of the open-source 3D printing community, and this machine really shows it, as its partnership with Bondtech has produced one of the finest machines on the market today.

What's even more surprising is that you can buy the simple four-tool kit for less than £2,000/$2,000 assembled, and the eight-tool set that I'm looking at in this review is a touch over that £2,000/$2,000.

That money not only gets you access to eight-tool printing, but also to one of the most reliable and solid-performing 3D printers I've ever used. The machine is based around the CORE One, a machine that I'm just upgrading to the One+, and is still the most used and reliable 3D printer in the workshop.

Whilst that's machine is only one filament, upgrading that reliable system into this eight-tool-changer machine absolutely makes sense.

I went for the fully assembled version because I just don't have time to assemble a machine, but if you do fancy the kit, you can save almost £300/$300 over the pre-assembled version that I'm looking at.

While the eight-tool-changer printing is obviously the major headline here, it's only when you start using it and put it side-by-side against the likes of the Bambu Lab H2C and, at the cheaper end, the Snapmaker U1 that you really start to see the full potential.

The speed is a significant upgrade on both of those machines, and even with the H2C's far larger print bed, in a head-to-head printing a 5-color print, whilst on the Core One+ INDX it had to be done in several batches, the new 3D printer was able to produce substantially more models than the larger machine in less time.

At present, considering the price, the multifilament printing reliability and speed, this is the best 3D printer I've ever tested (and I've tested many). It makes it hard to recommend any other machine, and with the CORE One L now also adapted to utilise the INDX system, Prusa once again leads the field for this scale of machine, from small to large-scale projects.

Prusa CORE One+ (Gen 2) INDX 8-Tool: Price and Availability

The Original Prusa CORE One+ (Gen 2) INDX 8-Tool is available directly from Prusa. Prices start at $2249 / £2039 assembled, and $1949 / £1769 for the kit.

Shipping starts October 15.

If you already own a CORE One or CORE One+, you can buy the upgrade kit, which is $999 / £909 for the 8-tool version (a 4-toolhead is also available). Other INDX conversion kits from Prusa can also be found here.

Essentially, like the very first model, it doesn't matter what Original Prusa machine you have; there is always an upgrade route to the latest version.

Prusa CORE One+ (Gen 2) INDX 8-Tool: Design

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

I looked at the original Prusa CORE One back in January 2025, and at the time it was a significant update to the MK4S, their previous machine. Since then, we've seen the larger version, the original Prusa CORE One L, and more recently the Plus upgrades to both. Now we also have the INDX from Bondtech and Prusa Research.

Since the machine is from Prusa, you have several ways to buy it, unlike most companies these days. The first is to buy it off the shelf as a fully assembled, ready-to-go option, which is exactly the option I went with in this review.

If, however, you really want to see the inner workings of the machine, and for many people running print farms or small businesses, I would probably recommend at least buying one machine in kit form so that you can see how it works. This gives you a good idea of how to repair it if something does go wrong.

Taking a look at the machine, the first thing you notice is that, from the outside, it looks almost identical to the CORE One. In fact, the main body and build area are the same, and it's only the 8 reels on the outside that really give it away.

I've used them without the dry boxes you can attach as well, really because I only have two and need to purchase another six to ensure my machine looks balanced. Still, aside from the four reel holders on each side, the major difference here is the INDX system bolted onto the front top of the machine.

This added dock essentially covers the view to the platform and contains the eight new toolheads, which are all heated through induction rather than traditional wires. This means that they can be attached to their magnetic dock along the front of the machine cold, heated up in just a few seconds, and printing following a filament change can start within a few seconds, far faster than any other system.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The other major difference here is that, obviously, the CORE One was a fully enclosed machine. This carries over to the INDX expansion, with a hinged top lid, secured in place by two rotating holders that are, of course, 3D printed.

The area is slightly smalled the original Prusa CORE One because because of the new additions but only marginally at 248 x 205 x 270 mm, dropping from 250 x 220 x 270 mm, so 2mm in one direction and 15mm in the other while the height remains the same.

Essentially, the Prusa CORE One+ INDX is the original Prusa CORE One+, the second generation, with the Bondtech INDX system incorporated.

While it may look very similar asthetically, in practice, this machine's potential goes far beyond what was available before and at this price.

  • Design: 4.5/5
Prusa CORE One+ (Gen 2) INDX 8-Tool: Features

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Specs

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Print Technology: FFF/FDM, eight-tool INDX tool-changing system

Build Area: 248 x 205 x 270 mm

Minimum Layer Resolution: 0.05mm

Maximum Layer Resolution: 0.30 mm

Dimensions: Width: 620 mm, Depth: 470 mm, Height: 690 mm

Weight: 24.5 kg

Bed: Heated print bed; heated chamber up to 55°C

Print Surface: Removable print sheet; multiple sheet finishes available

Software: PrusaSlicer

Materials: PLA, PETG, TPU, PC, nylon and other engineering filaments; abrasive materials will wear the nozzle

One of the great features of the Prusa machines is their customizability, so one of the first decision you have when looking at a Prusa machine is do you buy it assembled or as a kit. If you're a business and buying several, I would personally buy the majority as assembled and one as a kit, it will just give you that insight that can be invaluable.

Either way, if you need to keep costs down, you can opt for the assembled version without the camera, advanced filtration system, or additional print sheets, which keeps it at its base level. Or, if you want those more advanced features, they can be added on as well, so you can have the camera, advanced filtration, and different sheet finishes depending on the materials you're actually printing.

The machine is also available as a 4, or 8-tool option, with about £300 difference between the two. If you can stretch to it, I would definitely opt for the eight-tool version, which I'm looking at in this review, but if you can't, you can always buy the eight-tool upgrade kit later.

When it comes to the print volume, the machine offers an area of 248 x 205 x 270 mm, which isn't the largest for a machine of this size and a slight reduction over the Core One+, but it's still pretty decent.

Like the CORE One and One+, it's designed for engineering materials such as PC and nylon and has a heated chamber that reaches up to 55°C.

The main feature is its advanced tool changer. Unlike other multifilament machines that have one or two nozzles, or, in the case of the H2C 6, U1 4, here we see 8 individual nozzles that are preloaded with filaments during the initial calibration process.

Those nozzles sit cold in a docking station across the front of the machine, and only when the head picks up each nozzle does it use induction rather than wiring to heat it to the right temperature in about 12 seconds per material, so it's ready for use. This process dramatically cuts both filament waste and the time it takes to get up to speed.

What's impressive here is that when those tools are back in the dock, they cool right down. They're actually just passive toolheads, so whilst the filament is loaded within them, there are no electronics, making it even easier to change those nozzles when needed.

One feature Prusa highlights is that bed levelling is done through pressure, so the nozzles touch the print bed before printing starts; a load cell reads the force, and the machine knows exactly where the print bed is. This differs from many newer printers that have started using optical solutions. Whilst these are generally good, they're not always 100% accurate.

One of the big changes for Prusa, and something the company has tried to avoid until now, is a silicone wiper. Positioned just to the right of the machine, there are some silicone pads which each of the nozzles wipes across to remove any blobs before printing, and this is positioned right next to the purge collector, which, as I found through the test, even after hundreds of hours of printing, gathers very little waste material.

The INDX head features conductive electronics that heat each passive toolhead. Still, it's more than just technology: the extruder is self-adjusting, so it can alter its grip for different materials. This essentially means that, using the same system, you can print with soft materials such as TPU and rigid engineering filaments without having to stop the extruder for each.

Finally, because each one is passive, it takes literally seconds to change them. So, if you want to go from the standard 0.4 to 0.25 at the finest, up to a big, thick 0.8, then the tool-change process takes a couple of seconds. Simply unload the filament, remove the toolhead from the dock with a pull and release the feeder tube; plug in the new one, pop it back in the dock, load the filament, and you're set to go.

Each toolhead needs to be calibrated, and an automatic tool-offset calibration sensor is mounted on the outside of the print area. The speed at which this works, and the fact that it all works automatically, is impressive. To keep things running smoothly, I rerun the full calibration at the end of the week after clearing out any debris from the machine, which is probably one reason this machine has been so reliable.

Once again, to reduce vibration from movement in the machine, and so it sits in with most workshop devices, it features an all-steel build. As you pick up the machine and move it around, it is relatively heavy but easy to manoeuvre, with decent grip handles on either side, so you can move it from one side of the workshop to the other without too much issue.

And these days security is a huge issue, and it's nice to see that Prusa has taken this seriously and offers a 100% offline and, if you want, private solution to transferring files over to the machine. If you want to remove the Wi-Fi module, that's very easy to do, and if you want higher security, Prusa again offers a range of advanced features.

  • Features: 5/5
Prusa CORE One+ (Gen 2) INDX 8-Tool: Performance

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

There's been a lot of anticipation around the Prusa CORE One+ INDX 8T in the 3D printing community. Essentially, it blends the robust printing abilities of the Prusa CORE One with Bondtech's tool changer, and the result is an absolutely stunning printer that produces exceptionally fine multicolor prints at a very reasonable price, considering the competition in this sector.

There are, of course, a few small downsides, such as the fact that the print bed on the CORE version is relatively small compared with what we've been used to seeing recently, and on my initial few runs I did have a couple of misprints. But as the printer itself bedded in and I became more familiar with the system, I was able to resolve all issues and also learn more about the printer, which gave me greater confidence that, as with their previous printers, if anything goes wrong, I would be able to fix it without the wait that I've experienced with many other multitool machines.

That getting-started process is, in essence, no more complicated than with any other machine, and from the box to sitting on the workshop bench ready to produce its first print took no more than 10 minutes. It was faster than I expected, especially since I set up the XL a couple of years ago.

Essentially, the main machine is complete, and then it's just a matter of opening the box with all the nozzles, popping them into the front of the machine, and inserting each feeder tube. Then you're essentially set and ready to go once the power cable has been inserted.

Also supplied is a USB-C key with plenty of models to get you started. As I loaded the eight reels onto the side of the machine, it did expand the space needed either side of the printer, but it still fit neatly next to some of the machines in the test area.

What I also really like is that I can easily shift this printer around the workshop without too much issue. It's heavy, but nothing compared with some of the larger machines. It is that stopgap between the Snapmaker and the Bambu Lab H2C.

As I started the test, the big question that I had was: with a standard-size print bed, would this printer actually be a viable option for people running print farms? Was it fast enough even though that platform wouldn't be able to print the same volume of models? As the first few test models that Prusa supplied came off the print platform, I was instantly impressed by the complexity of the models produced and by the time it took to print.

I tried out a series of multi-filament and, in some cases, multi-material prints, and they took far less time than I would've expected, even with the H2C set to its fastest usable print speeds.

I ended up running a head-to-head between the two with a dragon model, and this is where the speed of the new Prusa CORE One+ INDX 8T really stood out.

On the H2C, the platform was able to take 14 dragons, which was impressive, whilst the Prusa INDX was restricted to 9. When it came to the time it would take for the dragons to print, this is where the biggest difference came, and whilst there were five additional dragons on the H2C, it takes 3 days and 10 hours to make that print, while the Prusa will took one day and 35 minutes according to the software. When translated to the actual time these printers took to run through those prints, they were quite accurate, plus or minus about 30 minutes. Notably, by the time the H2C, with much the same speed setting as the Prusa INDX, had finished its 15 prints, I had 27 from the CORE One INDX. Obviously there is the inconvenience of clearing the platform after each print run.

Another point here is that there is no purge tower. Instead, a small amount of filament is scraped from the toolhead before it's used, but the tool-change speed is far faster than other tool changers. Essentially, that induction system works incredibly quickly, meaning sometimes you can't even really tell that the tool change has happened, as the printer is only not printing for a few seconds.

This test was also a great time to ensure calibration and accuracy for both printers were spot-on, and it actually took a couple of days to get 100% reliability from both the Prusa and the H2C through tuning. But since I ran the test right at the start, both machines have been running side-by-side flawlessly.

Setting down the models from each printer, what's instantly apparent is how little quality difference there is between the two. Layer by layer, the walls look smooth and the transition between colors is neat. You can obviously still see the layers. These prints are as fine as any.

Through the test, as always, there were plenty of firmware updates, and some of the early issues that I had were with tool eight, which for some reason would always print just a little bit high was resolved.

After an update, a good vacuum of the inner chamber and a full recalibration, that seemed to kick into life and resolved the issue. It was a bit of an odd one. It worked in the initial stages of the test, then after a firmware update and a particularly messy misprint, it stopped working correctly, and then it worked again after the next update. It's now been three weeks, and that particular nozzle is now working absolutely fine.

There are a few other small issues that I've come across. My biggest issue whilst using the machine is the filament mount on the side of the machine, not so much that it's on the side, but the fact that those filaments are exposed. Prusa does sell individual dry cases for each of those filaments, which is a good thing, but these are very much bolt-on, and while they work, there are neater solutions.

Then there's the filament feed, and this is the part that started to get to me over the weeks with plenty of filament changes. Essentially, unlike the Snapmaker or Bambu multi systems, you still have to feed the filament into the machine, and with four filament reels on each side, this can get a little bit messy.

If space is tight, getting your hands in and feeding the reel around while pushing the filament up into the feeder tube all the way to the hot end is one of those tedious, fiddly things. I would love to see some sort of auto-feed system.

Then, for less experienced users, the camera and filtration system on the back need to be fitted, and it's not as simple as plugging them in and attaching them. You do need to remove the panel, feed the cable through, and plug it into the board, which takes about 15 to 20 minutes.

It's not complicated; it's just one additional step rather than being ready out of the box. The idea is that you can customise the machine to your exact needs. Not everyone wants a camera, but since cameras are such a standard part of many setups, it's something you expect.

The other surprise is that the nozzles aren't designed for abrasive printing, so if you do want to use PETG-CF, PC-CF, or another abrasive material, the nozzles will wear out relatively quickly. Essentially, they're rated for 10 kg of PETG-CF or 5 kg of PC-CF. While checking all the different material types, I noted that if you're using Prusament Ultra Glow, you'll get through just 0.5 kg of filament before the nozzle likely needs replacing. These are not hardened nozzles, although those are on the way very soon.

The point is that the print area is just 248 x 205 x 270 mm. That reduces the CORE One's build plate from 250 x 220 x 270 mm, giving a slightly smaller build area again.

One of the good things is that many of the early issues, such as stringing issues with the nozzles carrying filament back into the machine and other early performance problems, have all been addressed by each firmware update.

Obviously, for this review sample, it is an early production model, and what is striking is that with every firmware update that came in, and as I became more familiar with the machine and it bedded in, the machine became more accurate and reliable.

It's now been three weeks since I've had to do anything to it, and it's been running continuously printing ready for a new term. I will obviously give it a bit of oil as it requires, but otherwise this is a multitool machine that will print thousands of models without much maintenance, and that is one of the key points of Prusa machines.

Dimensional accuracy - score of 4

Target 25 = X: 24.76mm / 0.24mm Error | Y: 24.70mm / 0.30mm Error

Target 20 = X: 19.82mm / 0.18mm Error | Y: 19.80mm / 0.20mm Error

Target 15 = X: 14.75mm / 0.25mm Error | Y: 14.72mm / 0.28mm Error

Target 10 = X: 9.88mm / 0.12mm Error | Y: 9.83mm / 0.17mm Error

Target 5 = X: 4.88mm / 0.12mm Error | Y: 4.78mm / 0.22mm Error

X Error Average = 0.182

Y Error Average = 0.234

X&Y Error Average = 0.208

Fine Flow Control - score of 4

Fine Negative Features - score of 5

Overhangs - score of 5

Bridging - score of 4

XY resonance - score of 2.5

Z-axis alignment - score of 2.5

Add the totals for a final score of 27 out of 30.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Before I leave the performance section, another point about the prints is the new color-blending mode within PrusaSlicer known as Prusa Color Mix, and this is something I'm still trying to get my head around. It's quite incredible how it works.

Essentially, like a dot matrix, it blends the colors you have together to create more colors by creating fine layers of filament rather than physically blending the two or more. With two fish models I printed very early on, I was first impressed that they printed.

They're quite complex models, and I set them aside for a few days. Then it occurred to me that there were about three or four different greens within the print, yet I only had one green loaded onto the machine. At that point, I realised that the color mix was in full flow with these models.

I went back to PrusaSlicer and started trying some color-blending modes myself and, again, was impressed by how easy it was to use. I would say that randomly loading different-colored filaments onto the spools will get you some pretty interesting results. If you really want headline-worthy features, careful filament choice is definitely needed. However you approach it, the results are incredibly impressive.

Whilst I've just touched on the beginning of how this technology works, it's probably one of the most exciting enhancements from any 3D printer that I've seen, meaning that those eight filament spools, especially if you get the color combinations right, can produce thousands of different colors.

  • Performance: 5 / 5
Original PRUSA CORE One: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Original Prusa CORE One+ INDX 8T is a 3D printer in a different league, and while the build area is smaller than even the CORE One, the speed at which you can do a multicolor print is much faster than any off-the-shelf machine I've tried.

Most of the initial misprints and small issues I had were mainly the machine bedding in rather than any major problems, and this is an early review sample with fixes coming through the firmware updates. Still, even then as an early production sample its performance has been absolutely solid and rivals and beats any of the machines I have in the workshop.

Unusually, it has also been of major interest to several friends who run 3D print farms and engineering businesses, particularly for prototyping with multiple materials and colors. The production times of those models are vastly reduced, and whilst 3D printing already cut down their prototyping time dramatically, the Prusa CORE One+ INDX once again cuts down that time even further.

What's surprising here is that, even with a fully assembled machine pretty much ready to go out of the box, and with all those new firmware updates and obviously the knowledge that's out there as well, this becomes one of the cheapest multitool machines on the market whilst also being easily one of the best.

Some machines have a refined, fully product-designed, more plastic aesthetic that gives them a high-quality feel, and they are obviously extremely impressive.

The Prusa's more workshop-style design means it's a far better fit for many businesses; if anything ever goes wrong, you have full access to the plans, a huge knowledge base, and one of the best support networks available from any 3D printer manufacturer. You'll never be stuck without a printer.

Should you buy the Original PRUSA CORE One?

Value:

Excellent value for 8-tool printing, giving reliability, speed and repairability when you need it

5

Design:

Robust and practical design, although spool handling and bed size are a compromise.

4.5

Features:

The 8 tools, color mixing, offline operation and essential easy maintenance make this a great business option.

5

Performance:

Fast and reliable multicolor printing with excellent quality after initial bedding in an calibration.

5

Total:

A superb multitool printer that combines speed, flexibility and reliability.

5

Buy it if...

You need fast multicolor printing.

Eight independent toolheads make filament changes extremely fast, cutting delays for multicolor and multi filament printing.

You want a machine you can maintain yourself.

A repairable design, accessible components, and strong support make maintenance easier and reduce reliance on servicing.

Don't buy it if...

You regularly print very large models.

The modest build area makes larger prototypes and models better suited to bigger-format printers instead.

You want completely automated filament handling.

Loading eight reels can be fiddly, while regular material changes still require some manual intervention.

We've also tested out the best laser engravers

Apple AirPods 5 Review: A Better Upgrade Than I Expected - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 09:07
With better sound and noise cancellation, the AirPods 5 are great for Apple users who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears.
Traveling to China? Here Are the Apps You’ll Need to Survive - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 09:27
Forget everything you think you know about China’s internet and read this first.
Walmart Deals of the Day: Why Preorder the AirPods 5 When Apple’s Pro Earbuds Are Now $50 Off? - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 10:48
Plus, over $150 off a new 55-inch TCL TV for football season and $40 off a seriously convenient Keurig K-Elite single-serve brewer.
Amazon Deals of the Day: Why Clean the Floors Yourself When This Roborock Vac Is Almost Half Off? - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 11:27
Plus, save big on earbuds and smartwatches from Google and Samsung.
Monday Night Football: How to Watch the Denver Broncos vs. Kansas City Chiefs Tonight - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 12:02
Week 1 wraps up in Kansas City tonight with an AFC West clash on ESPN and ABC.
Get a Brand-New iPhone 18 Pro on T-Mobile With Not One, but Two Preorder Deals - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 12:48
Two deals, same brand-new iPhone 18 Pro with T-Mobile’s preorder discounts.
Steam Frame, Reviewed: Valve’s Ambitious VR Headset Feels Like an Experiment in Progress - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 13:01
Whether you consider it a PC VR evolution or a Steam Deck for your face, the Frame is both frustrating and fascinating to play with.
Why Is My iPhone ‘Optimizing Search and Siri’ With iOS 27? - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 13:11
This process could take a few hours or longer, but your iPhone will still work in that time.
I’ve Been Using iOS 27 for Months. Here’s What’s Great and What Needs to Change - Monday, September 14, 2026 - 13:11
The new OS doesn’t feel like a total overhaul, but most of the changes consistently nudge things in a good direction.

Pages