News

The Google Pixel Watch 5 is one of those smartwatches that’s pretty easy to review after a week of wear. It’s fast, it’s accurate, it looks nice and it’s comfortable to wear. There are a few big, groundbreaking changes in this edition: more accurate fitness tracking GPS, Breathing Emergency Detection and Insulin Resistance Trends, which are great, but they work largely in the background, improving existing features, or waiting in the wings to detect an event that (hopefully) may never arrive.

Gemini has become smarter, but that change is a result of the entire Google ecosystem rather than the watch specifically. The watch does give you the means to access Gemini on-wrist, which (if you have an internet connection) is like a little constant Hitchhiker’s Guide companion. It’s less useful for driving the functions of the watch day-to-day though, and I ended up using it the same way as other, more basic voice assistants. I’ve found some problems with Gemini, both as an entity in itself and as an agentic on-wrist assistant, which I’ll discuss later in this review.

The unique charging stand — in which the watch is vertical like a little clock — and the curved teardrop design, sizes and band-switching mechanisms are identical to the previous editions.

The biggest changes day-to-day are in the fitness features, thanks to the Google Health revamp. Google Pixel Watches used to use Fitbit software, but since Fitbit morphed into Google’s AI-first Google Health app, the free version is quite stripped-back, and the premium version is heavily reliant on an AI chatbot (again, based on Gemini) to interact with your data, build workouts, log food and generally use it in a meaningful way.

Your mileage will vary for this, based on your patience threshold with AI, but the subscription-free version of the app is sparse. That might be okay if you have the super-cheap Google Fitbit Air, but those spending $429.99 / £399.99 / AU$699 on a premium smartwatch, and don’t want to pay for Google Health Premium on top, might feel left out in the cold in terms of fitness features.

But, thanks to Wear OS’s vast library of third-party apps, the Pixel Watch’s elegant, repairable design, and some quality improvement and accuracy tweaks, the Google Pixel Watch 5 cements the series’ position as the best Android-native watch to buy for another year.

Component

Google Pixel Watch 5 (45mm)

Price

$429.99 / £399.99 / AU$699

Dimension

45 x 45 x 12.5mm

Weight

37.5g (without band)

Case/bezel

Aluminum

Display

Actua 360 domed display, 320 ppi AMOLED LTPO (up to 3,000 nits)

GPS

Dual Frequency GPS: GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS

Battery life

Up to 40 hours Always-On Display

Connections

4G LTE, Satellite SOS, Bluetooth 6.0, Wi-Fi, NFC

Water resistant

Yes, 5ATM

• Starts at $399.99 / £369 / AU$649 for the 41mm model
• $429.99 / £399.99 / AU$699 for the 45mm model
• LTE at an additional cost

The Google Pixel Watch 5 starts at $399.99 / £369 / AU$649 for the 41mm model, and $429.99 / £399.99 / AU$699 for the 45mm, which is the model I tested. The pricing is roughly equivalent to the Apple Watch Series 12, while being slightly more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy Watch9, so I’m happy that it represents reasonable value for money — unless, that is, you’re buying it primarily for fitness.

The reason I say that is because you’ll need a premium subscription to the Google Health app, which costs $9.99 / £7.99 / AU$14.99 per month, to unlock all its features, whereas Samsung and Apple don’t lock core fitness features behind a paywall.

Apple’s own premium tier, Apple Fitness+, is a Peloton-style workout content service, not a paywall behind which your health information is locked. With this in mind, I’ve taken half a star off the Google Pixel Watch 5’s value score.

• Value score: 3.5/5

• Teardrop-domed Actua 360 display
• Comfortable to wear
• Materia 3 expressive software

I’ve always liked the design of Pixel Watches, and the Pixel Watch 5 looks and feels basically identical to the Google Pixel Watch 4. That domed teardrop Actua 360 display is just as bright as the Watch 4 at up to 3,000 nits, with the same bezel size. It’s a beautiful display, and if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The 60Hz refresh rate makes scrolling maps and messages, and other interactions, butter-smooth.

I do kind of wish the watch face had a raised bezel for protection, but that would completely ruin the look of the watch. As is, I love the design — I actually think it looks better than the squircle Apple Watch — and the watch is well protected from minor scrapes thanks to its Custom 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5. The watch is also repairable, able to be taken apart at home to replace the battery and display.

I’m wearing the 45mm model as I write this review, and it doesn’t look too big for my wrist, while the 41mm is a nice pebble shape that’ll look good on small wrists. A small digital crown acts as a button, a scrolling mechanism, and even a snooze button when the watch is on charge. The charging puck has you balance the watch vertically, with the screen reoriented to look like a clock. It’s a lovely design all round.

Wear OS 7, wrapped in the Pixel Watch’s Materia 3 Expressive design language, is a joy to interact with day-to-day. Notifications look nice, and the icons and messages resizing as I scroll is a great touch. My only software design quibble is Google’s divisive Google Health app which some commenters call ‘messy’ even in its free tier, and I dislike having to interact with the chatbot. However, that’s a Google suite problem as opposed to a specifically Pixel Watch 5 one.

• Design score: 4.5/5

• New background health features
• Third-party app ecosystem
• Gemini intelligence features

A number of new features debut on the Google Pixel Watch 5, most of them driven by the new, improved Gemini intelligence. In practice, Gemini here is largely an extension of the tools on your Android phone, although raise-to-talk to ask Gemini a question is a nice touch. You can also use it to call or message contacts hands-free, and all the usual use-cases, such as setting timers.

Gemini, once given permission to access your contact details, will work in the background across your phone and your watch with tools like Proactive Assistance (a feature which requires a Pixel 11 phone to pair the watch with), which uses Gemini to anticipate your next move based on the content of your message. One example Google gives is your friend requesting contact details for a babysitter: Gemini will pull up the babysitter’s phone number in a draft message ready to send with a tap on your wrist. It’s clever stuff, and it helps the watch begin to feel more like the agentic personal assistant we’ve been promised.

Health-wise, we get new emergency tools, with last year’s Loss of Pulse Detection feature returning alongside Breathing Emergency Detection, which monitors for severe drops in blood oxygen caused by choking, pneumonia, drug overdose, or any other airway-limiting urgent health issue.

Google says its feature works by triggering a strong haptic vibration and notification, followed by a countdown. If the countdown is not cancelled, Google says the feature “automatically prompts your connected phone or LTE-enabled watch to call emergency services. Once the call is connected, an automated voice message informs the emergency operator that a breathing emergency was detected.

“It explains that you aren’t responding and shares your precise location. If you’ve set up emergency contacts, the feature sends a message notifying them that you may need help.”

Blood pressure trends and insulin resistance trends (both metrics that would normally require the use of specialized gear to measure) can now be viewed as monthly reports generated by your watch reading other vitals using its LEDs. While these features aren’t as accurate as a blood pressure cuff or an invasive glucose monitor, they provide a general indication as to whether you may need to visit a doctor. You do not need a paid Google Health subscription to use these ‘Health Guardian’ features.

All of this is added to the Pixel Watch’s impressive existing feature ecosystem, with music control and storage, GPS workouts, access to third-party apps, on-wrist phone conversations and messaging, and all the usual communications features you’d expect from a flagship smartwatch.

• Features score: 5/5

• GPS accuracy improved, and was responsive during testing
• Heart rate tracking lines up with other wearables
• Comfortable to wear day-to-day, but battery life still a sticking point

Another year, another Pixel Watch, another battery complaint. My biggest gripe about high-powered, communication-forward watches as opposed to lower-power models, like the best Garmin watches is the battery life. While the Pixel Watch 5 does have fast charging, and you’ll be able to top it up from empty to full power in less than an hour on the charging puck, it’s frustrating to have the watch die on you mid-morning after you’ve been wearing it for just a couple of days, especially if it does so before your gym session.

Daily charging, or at least every other day if you don’t have the always-on display enabled, is a necessity, while a 2.5-hour hike drained around 25% of the watch’s battery life during my testing.

At least the Google Pixel Watch 5’s metrics were up to snuff. Heart rate readings were in line with other wearables, with only very minor deviations against a Polar H10 heart rate monitor. Our writer Michael Sawh took the Google Pixel Watch 5 around the London Marathon course’s infamous Isle of Dogs route, well-known for causing GPS blackouts, and found it performed very well against an Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Garmin Fenix 8 Pro. You can read his full breakdown here.

The AI is useful, but not as useful as Google wants you to believe. Surfacing contextual information from your contacts is nice, and the voice assistant is fine, but there are too many edge-cases for it to be truly agentic. I asked Google Gemini on my watch for directions to my local train station, but rather than immediately surfacing directions it sent me back to my phone to open Google Maps to enable and confirm the route, then back to my watch, where I still had to open the Wear OS Google Maps manually.

Worse are the inaccuracies. As a stress test, I asked Gemini to find a local yoga class in my city center that started before 9am: it gave me two that started at 10am (without telling me), and one example that was completely fictitious — although Gemini said both the class and studio were on a particular street in my city, it was actually 14 miles away, and it got the time wrong anyway. Google may be very excited about the prospect of everyone having a virtual assistant to optimize their lives, but right now the technology doesn’t quite match up to the hype.

• Performance score: 3.5/5

Category

Comment

Score

Value

Generally in line with other smartwatches, but its fitness subscription mars value.

3.5/5

Design

Looks great, easy to use, visually distinctive.

4.5/5

Features

Health, fitness and communications features on top of Wear OS’s robust architecture and app libraries.

5/5

Performance

Battery life is still frustrating (although fast charging helps) and AI is inconsistent, but fitness is highly accurate.

3.5/5

You have an Android phone
The Google Pixel Watch 5 is the best Android / Wear OS watch on the market right now.

You want accurate GPS

It performed favorably against Garmin and Apple rivals during our tests.

You want repairability

The Google Pixel Watch 5 can be taken apart, and you’re able to replace its battery and display.

You want rugged

The teardrop shape may look nice, but adventurers may want a raised bezel to protect their watch’s display.

You want battery life

The Google Pixel Watch 5 may charge fast, but one missed nightly charge and you’ll likely be stuck with an inert watch at some stage over the next day.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2

The best Wear OS-adjacent watch for Samsung users.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 review

I wore the Pixel Watch 5 for around 10 days, testing it in the gym, on runs, and on hikes. I compared it to a Polar H10 heart rate monitor during a run, and our writer Michael Sawh tested its GPS against Garmin and Apple watches. I stress-tested Google Gemini with tasks and questions, and used the watch as my primary wearable during my testing period.

First reviewed: September 2026

• Apple debuted a new Apple Watch feature called Live Rewind
• It lets you play back audio from the last 15 seconds
• Some observers are worried it could violate people’s privacy

When Apple announced its Live Rewind feature at its Surprise and Shine event earlier this week, many observers were concerned that it would allow you to secretly record other people without their consent. After all, the tool just requires you to press a button on your Apple Watch and it plays back any audio that was captured during the last 15 seconds.

Is this feature a privacy nightmare, one that turns every Apple Watch into a “mass surveillance device,” as some people have worried? Or have people misunderstood what is happening, with Apple putting enough safeguards in place to prevent abuse and privacy violations?

Social media users seem to be divided, with some calling it “creepy and antisocial,” while others pointed out how it could be useful for deaf people or those with autism. Let’s take a look at the facts to find out what’s really going on.

What is this Live Rewind feature that is causing so much consternation? According to Apple, users of the Apple Watch Series 12 or Apple Watch Ultra 4 will be able to double-press the Digital Crown and receive a text transcription of what was said over the last 15 seconds. The company says this is useful if you missed something important, are deaf or hard of hearing, or are trying to recall a tip or recommendation from a friend.

Some people have worried that this would allow you to surreptitiously record other people without their knowledge, then save these recordings to your device for nefarious purposes.

However, Apple explained during the event that the feature never records or stores audio, it doesn’t identify anyone’s voice, and audio cannot be accessed by anyone (including Apple). To clarify matters, Apple has published an Audio Intelligence Privacy Overview that lays out how this feature — and Apple’s other new Audio Intelligence tools, including Siri Recap — works in detail.

When it comes to Live Rewind, any audio is processed in the Apple Watch’s Secure Enclave. This is a separate part of the S11 chip that, in this instance, processes audio. The Secure Enclave is siphoned off from the rest of the device and no part of the operating system can access it or the raw audio it handles. That includes both first- and third-party apps, and not even Apple can get to anything in the Secure Enclave.

Apple’s privacy paper notes that audio is never saved or recorded when you use Live Rewind. Instead, the audio is processed by the Secure Enclave and used to generate a transcript, then permanently deleted from both your device and from iCloud. There’s no way anyone can listen to the audio at a later date or extract it from your device.

Audio flows into the Secure Enclave on a rolling basis, which means that old data is continuously overwritten and deleted when new audio comes in. When activated, Live Rewind tries to send the last 15 seconds of audio to your iPhone. If it can’t — such as if your iPhone is not within wireless range — the audio is immediately discarded. If the process is successful, the audio is converted to text on your iPhone, deleted, then the text is sent back to the Secure Enclave in your Apple Watch.

The saved text stays available on your Watch for 30 seconds after the screen dims, after which it is discarded. You can optionally choose to save it to the Siri app, where it is end-to-end encrypted. This is the only instance where something is saved in the Live Rewind process. As mentioned previously, the text does not contain any speaker attribution.

You can ask Siri about your transcripts, at which point the text is sent to Apple’s secure Private Cloud Compute servers. If you use iCloud with two-factor authentication and have secured your device with a passcode, any transcripts from Live Rewind are synced using end-to-end encryption and not even Apple can decrypt them.

What about other people? Will they know that you’re using Live Rewind? Can you use the feature secretly?

Thankfully, you can’t really use Live Rewind without anyone knowing. When you double-press the Digital Crown, your Apple Watch plays an audible chime that occurs even if your device is in silent mode or you are listening via headphones. A full-screen animation also plays on screen and the microphone icon is displayed. Whether visually or through sound, your Apple Watch tries to alert other people about what is happening.

Apple also says that Live Rewind is opt-in rather than opt-out, and you can enable it when setting up a new device. You can also enable or disable the feature in Siri Settings on your Apple Watch or in the Siri Settings section of the Apple Watch app on your iPhone.

Although it would be polite to do so, there’s no way for Apple to force you to ask permission before using Live Rewind. But you might take some solace from the fact that there’s no way for anyone to save or extract the audio that the feature uses, nor can they attribute speakers. All a user gets out of it is a text transcript.

These privacy guardrails go some way to distancing Live Rewind from Meta’s so-called “Pervert Glasses” and their consent-busting data collection.

Snagajob is quite different from other job boards I’ve reviewed. It’s a marketplace for hourly and gig jobs, not the full-time corporate roles many other job boards focus on.

If you’re seeking temporary gig work to earn some cash or a flexible hourly role, Snagajob is an ideal platform. You can filter jobs by type, location, pay, and other factors.

What other factors set Snagajob apart from the competition? How broad are its job listings, and what are its pros and cons? What features should I expect? I’ve reviewed Snagajob thoroughly to answer these questions for intending users, so let’s see what it offers.

Most job boards have a business model where job seekers use the platform for free while employers pay to post job listings and find candidates. You can check it out by clicking here.

Snagajob follows the same pattern. Any job seeker can sign up for free, create a profile, and browse through job listings. Small businesses can also create free accounts to post basic job listings. But to post multiple, detailed job listings that’ll reach more candidates, employers need special accounts with paid subscriptions.

Employer subscriptions start at $89 per month for one active job listing. But it doesn’t scale directly at $89 per month per job listing. Rather, businesses can negotiate packages directly with Snagajob’s sales team. This platform uses a personalized pricing system, not standard subscription packages, even though the personalized packages are known to start at $89 per month.

I’ll say Snagajob is expensive, particularly for small businesses with limited budgets, but there’s a free plan for small businesses that need just basic job postings. However, for advanced job listings that’ll be promoted to more Snagajob users, the math works better for medium-sized and large businesses.

Snagajob doesn’t offer a standard free trial. However, when negotiating with the sales team, you can request demos to learn the platform’s ins and outs before deciding whether to pay.

Snagajob pairs people seeking flexible full-time or part-time jobs with employers offering these roles. After signing up, you can search for jobs in retail, logistics, restaurants, hospitality, e-commerce, and similar sectors, with flexible, hourly-paid roles.

You can also create a profile to specify your work experience and job preferences, then upload your resume to Snagajob’s database. This way, you don’t always have to go looking for jobs.

Employers can find your resume in this database, and if they deem you a good fit, they’ll message you about a potential offer. After the initial message, you’ll proceed to a formal interview and possibly snag the role.

As I’ve mentioned, Snagajob focuses on flexible, shift-based, hourly-paid jobs. Maybe you want some work at a restaurant, a grocery store, or a delivery company. Snagajob is the go-to platform in that case, but it’s not where you’ll find corporate tech, finance, or administrative jobs. It has its niche and serves that niche well.

As a job seeker, I’ll advise creating a complete Snagajob profile so that employers can find you. A complete profile also lets you apply for jobs in one click instead of reuploading your resume every time. You can also receive personalized job suggestions based on your profile and stated skills via email, so finding opportunities won’t be difficult.

Snagajob hosts many job listings, and I liked that I could easily filter by location. I entered my location, and it quickly showed available jobs near me.

Retail-adjacent jobs, the types present on Snagajob, require clocking in early, and long commutes for these kinds of jobs are inconvenient, so filtering by location is important.

There’s also gig work listed on Snagajob, the type where you create your own schedule. Most gig jobs are either couriers for food and grocery delivery apps or drivers for ride-hailing platforms, but the listings can differ based on your location.

Although I said Snagajob hosts many listings, “many” is relative. It isn’t like LinkedIn or Indeed that host millions of job listings simultaneously. Rather, it’s more like thousands of job listings, but that’s what sets it apart. Snagajob has a specific niche and focuses on quality over quantity.

I’ve used many other job boards and have come across duplicate listings or some listings that seemed questionable. That issue exists less on Snagajob than on other platforms, because of its niche and the relatively high costs for employers.

Snagajob leans towards roles from large restaurants, grocery, and retail chains, although medium-sized chains and single-location businesses still hire via the platform. Every job listing includes a salary range, which isn’t the same on many job boards, so you’ll always know what to expect before applying.

Also, I noticed Snagajob’s limited features outside of job listings. It’s not like Glassdoor, with its detailed company reviews and compensation data, or ZipRecruiter, with its AI-based resume builder, or LinkedIn, with networking features. Snagajob revolves around finding flexible jobs and offers little else. That’s a strength in one way but also feels like a competitive disadvantage.

Now, let’s look at Snagajob from an employer’s perspective. Businesses can create accounts to post jobs and find the right candidates. Small businesses can create free accounts to post a few listings, but only paid subscribers can post multiple listings with broader reach.

As I’ve mentioned earlier, Snagajob doesn’t have standard pricing, so businesses have to contact the sales team for a quote, but prices are generally known to start at $89 per month.

With an employer account, you have access to Snagajob’s database of resumes and worker profiles, from which you can select the right candidates. Algorithms curate candidates based on your job requirements so that it’s easier to select from a large pool.

Snagajob helps businesses quickly fill part-time or flexible full-time roles, but costs can get high. Larger retail, restaurant, and hospitality chains can easily afford it, but it’s not the most cost-effective option for small businesses. On the bright side, Snagajob offers free accounts for small businesses with limited features.

Snagajob excels when talking about user-friendliness. Its intuitive, uncluttered interface is one of the best I’ve encountered on a job board.

From registering to creating my profile, checking job listings, and applying, everything went smoothly. I’ll say the developers invested a lot in the user experience.

You can access Snagajob from the web interface or download the smartphone app (iOS or Android). Either option offers the same modern, intuitive interface that you can easily navigate.

Snagajob offers support resources, but I think it needs improvement in this area, particularly for self-help resources.

When discussing support, I always first check the official Help Center, where users can access resources to solve problems themselves and contact support personnel if they can’t do that. I didn’t find detailed user guides, manuals, and FAQs as I have on many job boards.

For direct help, job seekers can file a support ticket on Snagajob’s website and wait for an email response. Employers with paid subscriptions can email or call the support team directly.

The online job board sector has endless competition, but Snagajob stands out. It’s not built for the corporate and administrative jobs you’ll largely find on platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed. Instead, it’s focused on flexible part-time or full-time jobs, the type common in retail, hospitality, logistics, and related industries.

Snagajob isn’t trying to be a generalized job board like Indeed or LinkedIn, but one that focuses on a specific niche. These rivals offer a far larger array of job listings, salary data, and networking opportunities, but Snagajob is a better option for people seeking flexible gig-like jobs.

I’ll say Snagajob’s rivals aren’t conventional job sites like Indeed, but niche platforms like Instawork and WorkWhile. Instawork is built for people seeking short-term temporary work, and WorkWhile is designed for event and warehouse jobs. These are the kinds of roles also available on Snagajob.

I consider Snagajob a top-notch option if you’re seeking flexible jobs or gig work. It curates short-term, hourly-paid jobs from top retail and hospitality chains and also major logistics providers and similar businesses.

There’s a focus on quality over quantity, so you don’t have to spend as much time seeking available opportunities as you would on other platforms. However, don’t expect much else outside job listings in retail-adjacent industries. Snagajob serves its niche well but offers few complementary features.

For employers, Snagajob provides an easy way to urgently fill short-term roles, although subscription costs can get high. It’s a worthwhile investment for larger businesses that can absorb the costs.

For more picks, we've tested the best recruitment platforms and the best job sites.