News
- European automotive body suggests sales of electric vehicles are booming
- Results show annual EV sales in the UK have overtaken petrol cars
- But plug-in hybrids are propping up the figures
New data released by the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) suggests that more electric vehicles have been sold over the past 12 months than petrol cars, marking it as the first time this monumental shift has been recorded.
The milestone comes amid continued debate over the UK government's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate, with several manufacturers arguing the sales targets remain unrealistic without stronger consumer demand.
However, the recent data shows that in the 12 months to May 2026, UK consumers bought 516,490 new BEVs, compared with only 504,010 new petrol cars, according to analysis by Carbon Brief.
Similarly, data released by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) shows that registrations of petrol and diesel cars fell by -7.1% and -2.2% respectively, as electrified vehicles gained ground.
That said, the claims that electric vehicles are overtaking internal combustion cars are misleading, as while pure petrol-powered cars have now slipped behind battery electric vehicles in the sales charts, combustion-powered vehicles remain comfortably ahead once diesel, hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles are factored in.
That's because both conventional hybrids (HEVs) and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) still rely on an internal combustion engine. Although they're often grouped together under the umbrella term "electrified vehicles", neither is a fully electric car in the same sense as a battery-electric vehicle.
The latest Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) figures reflect this distinction, listing battery electric, plug-in hybrid and hybrid electric vehicles as separate categories rather than combining them into a single EV total.
According to its latest figures, battery-electric vehicles accounted for almost one in four new car registrations over the past year, comfortably overtaking petrol-only models.
However, when hybrid and plug-in hybrid registrations are added to petrol and diesel sales, combustion engines continue to dominate the market overall.
Analysis: this is still a big moment for EVs(Image credit: Omoda)We shouldn't downplay the significance of these figures, because they demonstrate a genuine shift away from conventional petrol-powered cars and towards electrified alternatives.
In fact, the SMMT’s data actually softens the decline of petrol engines, as it labels "mild" hybrids as petrol vehicles, the sales of which can obscure the true decline of pure fossil-fuel options, according to Arena EV.
But sales of these traditional hybrids, while still a significant figure, have actually tapered off in recent years, while sales of plug-in hybrids have risen by 24% year-on-year in May 2026, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association’s (ACEA) numbers.
The SMMT data backs this fact, claiming plug-in hybrid deliveries grew 23.9% to take an enlarged 13.8% market share in May of this year. Battery electric vehicle (BEV) uptake, meanwhile, increased 34.2% to take 27.3% of the market, the highest recorded so far in 2026.
It is clear that there is a noticeable shift in consumer buying habits, with more opting for plug-in hybrid variants that arguably act as a stepping stone to pure battery EVs.
Today’s plug-in hybrids, such as the Omoda's Super Hybrid System, can manage impressive mileage on a single charge of their battery packs, with 60-90 miles now relatively commonplace.
In my personal experience, a large majority of motorists quickly realize that they rarely need much more than the range offered by the electric system in their plug-in hybrid, and if they can charge at home, this makes it easier to contemplate going full electric in the future.
The use of fossil fuel might not be completely dead just yet, but the figures indicate that it is quickly slipping out of fashion.
Mobile gamers are in for a treat with Ugreen's new Honkai: Star Rail collaboration. The mobile accessory brand has unveiled five new special edition products that are out right now, plus a massive limited edition gift box with some exclusive merch for true collectors.
They're all based on the popular Star Rail character Yao Guang and includes two high-end power banks, a charger brick, retractable USB-C cable, and a little Apple Find My compatible tracker. All of the items have a special Yao Guang inspired design, with a clean blue color scheme and loads of little details to appeal to her biggest fans.
I've used plenty of Ugreen charging gear in the past, and can vouch for their quality. In fact, my go-to laptop and phone charger is the Nexode model from the brand's Genshin Impact collaboration last year.
All of these latest products are available with discounted launch pricing, as you can see below.
New Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail collab products Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Collectible Gift Box with exclusive merchandise Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Magflow Air Magnetic Power Bank (10000mAh, Qi2 15W) Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Nexode Air 65W mini USB-C Charger Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Nexode Pro Power Bank (10000mAh, 55W) with built-in screen Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Nexode 100W Retractable Cable, 3.3ft Ugreen x Honkai: Star Rail Finetrack Mini2 Tracker Tag- PlayStation CEO Hideaki Nishino has suggested the brand's next console could be a handheld ir hybrid
- He said Sony wants to break the perception that "PlayStation equals the living room"
- Nishino added that the next-gen console will offer "a seamless experience that can be enjoyed naturally beyond the living room"
New comments from Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Hideaki Nishino seem to suggest that the next-generation PlayStation console could be a handheld.
During a recent Q&A published by Sony (via IGN), Nishino was asked how Sony plans to bring back users who migrated to gaming PCs during the COVID period and if the company sees potential for significant changes with the next-gen console.
Nishino responded, saying that PlayStation "has long been strongly associated with the idea of playing in the living room." However, in recent years, gamers have been using personal monitors elsewhere in their homes, so Sony is now selling peripherals such as monitors and speakers "to break away from the fixed perception that 'PlayStation equals the living room' and to broaden usage scenarios."
This is when Nishino hinted at the next-gen console, which we expect will be the PS6.
"For the next-generation platform, rather than simply serving as an alternative to PCs, we aim to deliver value that is unique to PlayStation," he said. "This includes not only technological advancements but also an expansion of usage styles, enabling a seamless experience that can be enjoyed naturally beyond the living room."
It's this comment in particular that suggests that Sony is looking to shift gears and perhaps create a console similar to the Nintendo Switch 2.
The CEO made similar comments in a recent interview Famitsu, during which he said Sony wants to leverage tech "that can be used in various forms and locations."
Nishino confirmed that the company plans to continue focusing on consoles, saying, "My belief that a console is necessary for playing games hasn’t changed," adding that Sony "wants to continue providing its own game consoles."
He added that "pick up and play" is the most important quality for consoles nowadays, making one think of the Switch 2.
Rumors of a PS6 handheld have been circulating for some time. According to a reliable insider, Moore's Law is Dead, Sony will launch its next-generation PlayStation with three devices in 2027, including two consoles and a companion handheld.
The Sihoo B100 is one of the best budget ergonomic office chairs I've seen, and Amazon has reduced the price by 25%, with the B100 dropping to $166 (was $220). And in the UK, the Sihoo B100 is now £150 was £190
As good as the price reduction is, that's not the biggest reason I'd recommend this chair. That would be the adaptive lumbar support, a feature that's usually reserved for much more expensive office chairs and one that helps keep your lower back supported as you naturally move throughout the day.
Unlike fixed lumbar cushions, the support adjusts with your posture whether you're leaning forward to concentrate, sitting upright during meetings, or reclining for a quick break. It's the kind of feature that can make a real difference if you're spending long hours at your desk.
Today's top Sihoo office chair dealFor my money, the B100 is one of the best budget office chairs you can buy. The price is great, but the adaptive lumbar support is the standout feature. It offers consistent support even when you move in your seat, reducing pressure on your lower back and helping your posture.
In the UK: now £150 was £190View Deal
Although my team and I haven't yet reviewed the B100 specifically, we've tested plenty of Sihoo office chairs over the years and they have consistently impressed us with their comfort, adjustability, and value.
The widened seat cushion helps spread your weight more evenly, while the adjustable headrest provides extra support whether you're working, studying, or simply leaning back to think through your next project.
Three reclining positions at 110°, 125°, and 135° let you switch between focused work and a more relaxed posture throughout the day.
Flip-up armrests also make it easier to slide the chair neatly under your desk when you're finished.
The breathable mesh back helps improve airflow, keeping you cooler during long work sessions or warm summer afternoons.
A reinforced metal base, Class 4 gas lift, and support for up to 300lb complete a chair that is well equipped for everyday use and surprisingly affordable.
Based on our experience with Sihoo's wider range and the features on offer here, this is one of the strongest budget office chair deals available right now.
For more top picks, check out my guide to the best office chairs.
Also consider: More Sihoo office chair dealsIf you have the budget, the Doro C300 is an exceptional office chair with more adjustability than the B100. We tested this one and found it very breathable and comfortable for all-day sitting in our review.
In the UK: Now £240 was £340.View Deal
The M18 from Sihoo is a solid budget office chair that's nicely designed and has all the core features. I'd still recommend the B100 over this one due to the better lumbar support.
In the UK: Now £110 was £180.View Deal
There's a lot I like about Sihoo's M57, including the adjustable lower back support, 3D armrests, and 330lb weight limit. However, it's more expensive than the B100 right now, and there's no adaptive lumbar cushioning here.
In the UK: Now £229.23.View Deal
Most large enterprises have already experimented with AI in some form.
They have tested copilots, automated workflows, analytics platforms, content generation tools and customer service assistants, and initial reactions are often positive. Demonstrations create excitement, leadership teams engage quickly and investment follows.
Yet many organizations still struggle to move beyond isolated successes. Adoption slows, usage becomes inconsistent and AI initiatives gradually lose visibility inside day-to-day operations.
What begins as a strategic priority often becomes another innovation program that never fully reshapes the business.
At that point, organizations frequently conclude that the technology is not mature enough.
In reality, the bigger obstacle is often structural rather than technical. AI adoption rarely fails because the tools are incapable.
More commonly, organizations fail to adapt their operating models, incentives and decision-making structures to support meaningful change.
Fragmented ownership weakens adoptionOne of the biggest barriers to enterprise AI adoption is unclear accountability: technology teams manage IT infrastructure, governance, security and vendor relationships; innovation teams run pilots; individual business units experiment independently; and senior executives communicate ambition and strategic direction. Yet in many organizations, nobody owns AI adoption from end to end.
But without clear ownership tied to operational outcomes, AI initiatives often become disconnected from how work actually happens. Teams are encouraged to experiment but lack the authority to redesign processes or redefine how decisions are made. Pilots move forward without long-term accountability and successful experiments fail to scale beyond individual departments.
As a result, AI can exist inside the organisation without becoming embedded into its operating model. The technology itself may function well, but adoption stalls because no one is responsible for turning experimentation into lasting behavioral change.
Why technology teams cannot solve this aloneThis challenge becomes particularly visible inside platform, data and IT functions. These teams are frequently tasked with enabling enterprise AI adoption by assessing vendors, integrating systems, securing data environments and establishing governance frameworks. At the same time, they are expected to minimize operational risk and ensure compliance requirements are met.
However, they rarely control how individual departments actually work. Technology teams cannot independently redesign sales processes, restructure customer support operations or redefine HR workflows. They can provide tools and infrastructure, but they are not usually empowered to drive organizational change across business functions.
That imbalance creates predictable tension. If AI deployments introduce operational or security risks, technology teams are held accountable. But if adoption slows because departments resist changing established processes, responsibility becomes far less clear.
Over time, this dynamic naturally encourages caution. Teams carrying significant risk without the authority to control it often become more conservative in how aggressively they push transformation initiatives forward.
Incentives matter more than strategy documentsMany organizations also underestimate how strongly incentives shape adoption behavior. A customer service team may be encouraged to use AI tools at the same time as being measured primarily on ticket throughput and response speed. Marketing teams may be asked to experiment with AI-generated content while facing scrutiny over even minor inconsistencies in tone or branding.
Compliance teams could be expected to support innovation even though they’re evaluated almost entirely on risk reduction. In each case, employees respond rationally to the incentives in front of them.
Meaningful AI integration almost always creates short-term disruption. Teams need time to test workflows, adjust processes and learn how humans and AI systems operate together effectively. Productivity can temporarily decline before long-term gains become visible.
If organizations continue rewarding operational stability above all else, employees will avoid experimentation regardless of how ambitious leadership messaging may be.
This is one reason many “AI-first” strategies struggle to move beyond isolated use cases. Declaring strategic intent is relatively easy. Adjusting performance frameworks, redefining accountability and creating room for experimentation is far more difficult.
Unclear governance creates hesitationAnother major obstacle to adoption is uncertainty around governance and operational boundaries. Many organizations still have not clearly defined what AI represents within their broader operating model. Is it an individual productivity layer? A centrally governed capability? A feature embedded into existing enterprise platforms? Or a specialist function managed by dedicated teams? When those questions remain unanswered, ambiguity spreads quickly.
Employees become unsure what usage is permitted, while managers struggle to establish consistent expectations. Technology, legal and compliance teams disagree on where accountability begins and ends - and in practice, this uncertainty often slows adoption more than technical limitations do.
Clear governance does not need to eliminate experimentation. In fact, successful organizations usually balance flexibility with oversight. Employees are far more likely to engage confidently with AI systems when they understand where experimentation is encouraged and where stricter controls apply. Without that clarity, even capable tools can remain underused.
AI transformation is an operational challengeFor CIOs and senior technology leaders, this requires an important shift in perspective. AI transformation is often framed primarily as a technology modernization effort focused on infrastructure, integration and data readiness. Those foundations remain essential. Without them, large-scale deployment is impossible. However, technical readiness alone does not determine adoption outcomes.
The organizations making meaningful progress with AI tend to treat it as an operational redesign challenge rather than simply a software rollout. They integrate AI into existing workflows, align ownership with accountability and adapt governance structures to support new ways of working.
This also explains why many AI programs gradually shift from transformational ambitions into smaller experimental efforts. Experimentation is organizationally safer because it avoids forcing structural change. Unfortunately, it also limits long-term impact.
Successful organizations tend to share several characteristics. They establish clear executive accountability for measurable outcomes linked to AI adoption. Rather than prioritizing short-term stability, they align incentives with workflow evolution. By integrating AI directly into operational systems, they aren’t left to rely on disconnected standalone tools. And they define governance boundaries clearly enough that employees understand how AI should be used.
Notably, none of these are primarily technical decisions. They are organizational and leadership choices.
The real question organizations need to answerWhen AI initiatives underperform, organizations often focus first on the technology itself. Vendors are reassessed, models are compared and infrastructure decisions are revisited. Sometimes, those issues do genuinely matter. Often, however, the technology is functioning adequately while the organisation surrounding it has not evolved enough to support adoption at scale.
That distinction is crucial because organizational barriers are solvable. Accountability can be clarified. Incentives can be redesigned. Governance structures can be simplified. Operational ownership can be aligned more effectively with responsibility.
Ultimately, adopting AI means changing how work gets done across the business. And that means the question facing enterprises today is no longer whether AI technology is capable enough to deliver value. It is whether they are prepared to redesign themselves around it.
We list the best employee management software.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
The Tank 5 represents the most complete version of a concept that 8849 has been refining for several generations. Where earlier models asked buyers to accept trade-offs between size, battery and projector quality, the Tank 5 attempts to resolve all three at once. The result is something that genuinely has no mainstream equivalent.
There is a very specific kind of person the 8849 Tank 5 is made for. They work far from mains power. They need a phone that survives punishment. And occasionally, they want to project something onto a wall, a tent, or the side of a cliff face. For that person, no mainstream smartphone comes close.
Where previous models asked buyers to accept mid-range processors and modest projection quality, the Tank 5 brings flagship silicon to the category for the first time. The MediaTek Dimensity 9400e is a genuine top-tier chip in 2026 terms, and finding it in a device this rugged at this price is a pleasant surprise.
The headline numbers are hard to ignore. A 17,600mAh battery. A 3K AMOLED display peaking at 3000 nits. A 2K TI DLP projector with 220-lumen output and laser autofocus to four metres. Triple 50-megapixel rear cameras. Android 16 out of the box. On paper, this reads like a wish list written by someone who spends more time on a mountainside than in a meeting room.
The catch, as ever, is the physical reality. At 715 grams and nearly 34 millimetres thick, the Tank 5 is not a device you slip into a jacket pocket. It is a tool. And like any serious tool, it rewards the user who actually needs what it offers.
Is this one of the best rugged phones? That entirely depends on what features you value. For those who don’t care about size and weight but want battery capacity, exotic features and colourful display, this is certainly a contender.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)8849 Tank 5: price and availability- How much does it cost? $900/£697/€809
- When is it out? Available now
- Where can you get it? Direct from the maker or via an online retailer
The Tank 5 launches at $999.99 in pre-order configuration with the standard retail price listed at $1,599.99. However, now that those numbers have come down somewhat, with the US pricing at $899.99. In the UK, it’s £696.87, and across Europe it is €808.52, direct from the 8849tech website.
To put that into perspective, the Tank X launched at $549.99 early bird against a $1,049.99 RRP. The Tank 5, therefore, represents a substantial step up in cost, but is justified by improvements in specification.
Currently, the Tank X costs $699.99 from Amazon.com and £599 via Amazon.co.uk, making the Tank 5 pricing less of an uplift for those in the UK.
When considering alternatives, it's worth noting that remarkably few phones have a projector, and none of them has one with the same specification as the DLP unit in this phone.
Other than the Tank X and Tank 4 Pro by 8849, rugged phones with projectors include the Ulefone Armour 34 Pro Plus and Oukitel WP100 Titan. From Amazon.com, the Tank 4 Pro is $789.99, and the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro Plus is $594.99. The Oukitel WP100 Titan isn’t available from Amazon, but can be bought directly from the makers for $869.99.
The cover these in a spec comparison, the Tank X offers a slower Dimensity 8200 SoC and a lower resolution 1080p projector. The Tank 4 Pro only has a Dimensity 8300 SoC, but only a 720p projector. And the Ulefone Armor 34 Pro has the slowest processor, with a Dimensity 7300, and a weird projector resolution of 854 x 480. And finally, the Oukitel WP100 Titan has the same processor as the 34 Pro, and the same odd resolution to its 100 lumen projector.
Most of these have more battery capacity than the Tank 5, but critically, their projectors don’t come close to being a match.
Based purely on value for money, the 8849 Tank 5 is a winner.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)- Value score: 4.5/5
Item
Spec
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e, 4nm, octa-core (1x Cortex-X4 at 3.4GHz + 3x X4 at 2.85GHz + 4x A720 at 2.0GHz)
GPU
Immortalis-G720 MC12
RAM
18GB LPDDR5X (plus 18GB virtual)
Storage
512GB UFS 4.0, microSD expandable to 2TB
Display
6.73-inch AMOLED, 3200x1440px (3K), 120Hz, 3000 nits (local peak), Panda Glass
Main Camera
50MP Samsung ISOCELL GN1, PDAF, f/1.8, 4K30fps
Telephoto
50MP, 3x optical zoom, OIS
Night Vision
50MP with 4x infrared LEDs
Front Camera
32MP OmniVision OV32B40, f/1.7, 1080p video
Battery
17,600mAh dual-cell
Charging
120W wired (full charge approx. 90 min), 25W reverse charge
Projector
TI DLP, 2K resolution, 220 lumens, 4m laser autofocus, 4-point keystone correction
OS
Android 16
5G
SA/NSA, including bands n77/n78
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
SIM
eSIM + Dual Nano SIM
GPS
Dual-frequency L1+L5, multi-constellation
USB
USB-C (DisplayPort 1.4 Alt Mode)
Rugged Rating
IP68, MIL-STD-810H
Dimensions
177.1 x 87 x 33.8mm
Weight
715g
Colours
Black
8849 Tank 5: Design- Thick and heavy
- Vents for projector on both sides
Pick up the Tank 5, and the sheer physical commitment of it registers immediately. At 177.1 x 87 x 33.8mm and 715 grams, this device sits somewhere between a phone and a piece of site equipment. The chassis combines brushed metal plates, rubberised TPU corner armour and polycarbonate panels, and the build quality throughout is excellent. Seams are tight. There is no flex anywhere. It feels, correctly, like something engineered to survive conditions that would end a normal phone's life in seconds.
The layout of the Tank 5 is dictated by one thing above all others: cooling. The projector needs active thermal management, and the ventilation grille that serves it runs across a significant portion of the left frame. That grille is not a cosmetic addition. It is a structural constraint, and it shapes where every other control can go. The volume controls and shortcut buttons sit above it, pushed into the upper corner.
Below it, separated by a visible gap of bare metal, sit red and silver programmable buttons. The vent physically cleaves the left side into two distinct groups. It is an honest piece of industrial design. Nothing is where it is by accident, but you need to be careful where you place your fingers when the projector is running.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)The right side tells another story. A second vent grille occupies the upper portion, again serving the projector cooling system, and below it, the frame is noticeably cleaner with only a single large silver power key with its integrated fingerprint sensor. The visual contrast between the two sides is immediate. Where the left side is busy by necessity, the right side breathes.
The rear is where the Tank 5 makes its most direct statement of intent. The camping light bar dominates the centre of the chassis, a wide rectangular strip that illuminates with 1200 lumens and RGB warning modes. Above it sits the camera module, with two main lenses at the top right, the night vision lens below left and four infrared LEDs in a horizontal strip. The "TANK PROJECTOR INSIDE" text sits between the camera cluster and the lamp, which is either endearing or unnecessary depending on your tolerance for that kind of thing. The projector aperture itself is at the top edge, along with another flashlight and the SIM card slot.
Compared to the Tank X, the Tank 5 is a more resolved design. The Tank X was 91.8mm wide and 750 grams. The Tank 5 pulls back to 87mm and 715 grams. Those numbers sound modest, but the difference in hand is real. The Tank X sat at the outer limit of a comfortable two-handed span. The Tank 5 comes back just enough to feel deliberate.
What has not changed is the fundamental reality of the form factor. This is not going into any conventional pocket. A jacket chest pocket, a belt holster or a vehicle mount is the practical answer for daily carry. That is the honest consequence of fitting a projector, a 17,600mAh battery and an active cooling system into a single chassis, and the Tank 5 makes no apology for it.
Design score: 3.5/5
8849 Tank 5: Hardware- MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
- AMOLED display
- 17600 mAh fast charge battery
The Dimensity 9400e is an important specification decision. Most rugged phones at this price use mid-range silicon from three to four years ago. The Tank X stepped up to the Dimensity 8200, and that was already a significant advance. The 9400e goes further still, using a 4nm process with Cortex-X4 architecture.
The 'e' suffix indicates a slightly binned or optimised version of the full 9400. In practice, real-world performance at this specification level is well beyond anything a rugged phone buyer has previously been able to access at this price point. The comparison with the Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU is also notable for mobile gaming and sustained workloads.
The Tank X, launched in February 2026, was the first 8849 device to achieve 1080p DLP projection at 220 lumens. The Tank 5 carries that hardware forward and adds 2K output with laser autofocus rated to four metres. That four-metre figure is a meaningful practical upgrade, because how far away from the wall you can get dictates the size of the projection. Earlier models topped out at three metres, and the keystone correction has been expanded from two to four points. What this means in practice is a more practical outdoor cinema experience.
The 220-lumen figure also requires context, as it's extremely competitive within this product category, where some devices can only manage 100 lumen. The Ulefone Armor 34 Pro, a direct rival, managed 150 lumens at a lower resolution. However, any projector of this size still demands reasonable darkness for a clear image. The spec sheet implies more than the physics can deliver in daylight, as it needs to be twilight outside or in a shaded room for a good experience. But, this is more than any other brand is currently offering.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)My only complaint about the projector is that not long after it is activated, the cooling fan starts up and can be a little noisy. This won’t be a problem if you are projecting an action blockbuster, but it isn’t ideal for anything with quiet audio and dialogue.
Earlier Tank models used AMOLED panels, but the Tank 5 moves to a 3200x1440 native resolution. The 3000 nits peak brightness is a headline figure borrowed from premium consumer phones, and the results are spectacular.
Considering how good the display is, that 8849 went with Panda Glass to protect it, and not stronger Gorilla Glass Victus is disappointing.
That choice looks entirely cost-driven, but conversely, the battery technology used in the Tank 5 doesn’t hold back.
Seventeen thousand six hundred milliamp hours is a substantial number, even by rugged phone standards. The Tank 4 used an 11,600mAh cell. The Tank X brought the 17,600mAh configuration back after the Tank 3 and Tank 3 Pro sat at around 23,800mAh. The Tank 5 pairs that 17,600mAh capacity with 120W charging, which can be recharged in just over 90 minutes, incredibly. It does this by using a dual-cell design, so it works like two 8800mAh batteries.
The addition of 25W reverse charging makes the Tank 5 a practical field power bank. At that capacity, it can top up a standard 5000mAh smartphone three times over. For field workers and outdoor users, this is a genuinely compelling capability, even if you lose some of the capacity in the transfer.
Another full-cream feature is Wi-Fi 7. Most rugged phones ship with Wi-Fi 6 at best. The inclusion of eSIM alongside dual nano SIM slots gives the Tank 5 flexibility that neither predecessor offered. For travellers, the combination of eSIM, dual-frequency GPS and extensive 5G band support is a strong package. The addition of eSIM also means you can ditch one of the physical Nano SIMs, fit a MicroSD card in the tray, and still have two network services.
With a few minor exceptions, the specifications of the Tank 5 place it in the premium rugged phone bracket.
- Hardware score: 4.5/5
- 50MP main + 50MP telephoto + 50MP night vision
- 32MP on the front
- Four cameras in total
The 8849 Tank 5 has four cameras:
Rear camera: 50MP Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN1SP, 50MP OmniVision OV50C40, 50MP OmniVision OV50D40
Front camera: 32MP OV32B40
The camera cluster on the Tank 5 is a significant rethink compared to what came before it. On the Tank X, the three sensors were arranged in a vertical strip, with the 8MP telephoto the obvious weak link in the lineup.
The Tank 5 design addresses this directly with all three rear sensors now 50 megapixels, and this is a much more balanced package.
The two primary lenses sit at the top right of the module in a paired arrangement, noticeably larger than the sensors below. The night vision camera sits below and to the left, with the four infrared LEDs arranged in a horizontal strip beneath it. It is a purposeful, asymmetric layout that prioritises the main imaging hardware without pretending everything is equal.
The main sensor is a Samsung ISOCELL GN1 with phase detection autofocus. That’s a well-regarded chip with a strong track record on mainstream flagship devices. It is a genuine step up from the Sony sensor used on the Tank X, which, while capable, was hampered by the overall image processing pipeline more than the sensor itself. The GN1 brings improved low-light capture and better dynamic range handling. It might not be the 108MP sensor we’ve seen elsewhere, but the arrangement is decent and effective.
The caveat to this choice is that, while there is a PRO mode in the camera application, there are relatively few other special modes or HDR. This camera doesn’t do panoramas or slow motion, though it can do timelapse and super-resolution.
Video capture can be in resolutions up to 4K, but there is no control over the framerate, irrespective of the capture resolution.
The telephoto upgrade is the most important change for practical use. Going from 8MP to 50MP with optical image stabilisation transforms what the camera can do at a distance. The Tank X telephoto was essentially a crop tool dressed up as a lens. The Tank 5 telephoto is a genuine optical system with 3x zoom, and OIS means it remains usable in the kind of low-stability field conditions this phone is designed for. Hiking, construction sites, and vehicle-mounted use. All of these benefit from stabilisation in ways that a rugged phone buyer will actually notice.
The night vision camera is the one area where the upgrade is less straightforward. The Tank X used a 64MP OmniVision sensor for its night vision work, paired with four IR LEDs. The Tank 5 drops to a 50MP sensor for that role, but it's just as effective. The megapixel reduction is not inherently a problem, as night vision performance depends far more on sensor size, IR LED power, and processing than on raw resolution.
The front camera remains unchanged from Tank X, a 32MP with an OmniVision OV32B40 sensor and an f/1.7 aperture. A competent selfie and video-call solution by definition.
What the cluster cannot do is match a photography-focused flagship. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Pixel 9 Pro operate in a different league for computational photography, colour science and video processing.
That comparison is not unfair, but it is also largely irrelevant. The Tank 5 camera system is built for documenting field conditions, capturing evidence, seeing in the dark and shooting at range from an unstable platform. On those terms, it is well-equipped, and the results are better than those of some phones with more megapixels to play with.
One disappointment is that with a camera that can capture 4K video, and play that back nicely on the AMOLED screen, you won’t be using that display to see high-quality streams, because 8849 wouldn’t pay for Widevine L1 encryption.
8849 Tank 5 Camera samplesMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark Pickavance- Camera score: 4/5
- 4nm SoC
- Premium performance
Phone
8849 Tank 5
8849 Tank X
SoC
MediaTek Dimensity 9400E
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
GPU
ARM Immortalis-G720 MC12
Mali-G610 MC6
NPU
MediaTek NPU 790
MediaTek NPU 580
Memory
16GB/512GB
16GB/512GB
Weight
750g
Battery
17600
17600
Geekbench
Single
2097
1260
Multi
6536
3939
OpenCL
12943
4056
Vulkan
14916
4517
PCMark
3.0 Score
18477
15637
Battery
32h 25m (14%)
32h 48m (20% left)
Charge 30
%
46
11
Passmark
Score
25227
17045
CPU
11866
8623
3DMark
Slingshot OGL
Maxed Out
Maxed Out
Slingshot Ex. OGL
Maxed Out
Maxed Out
Slingshot Ex. Vulkan
Maxed Out
Maxed Out
Wildlife
Maxed Out
6343
Nomad Lite
1820
632
With so few competitors in this niche, it seemed logical to compare this 8849 to its predecessor, the Tank X.
And what we quickly learn here is that the Dimensity 9400e is a beast compared to the Dimensity 8200, outperforming it in every respect. The most sobering score is the 3DMark Nomad Lite performance, where it is nearly 300% better at this demanding benchmark.
But the other takeaway here is that you can have a more powerful SoC, without it impacting the power consumption dramatically. With the same battery capacity, the running time is remarkably similar to that of the Tank X, even though it does more over that time.
But where the Tank 5 really shows the most dramatic improvement is in the recharging of the battery, which took hours on the Tank X, and can be done in close to 90 minutes on the Tank 5. In just thirty minutes, being able to recover 46% of the battery is excellent.
Overall, the Tank 5 is a top-tier performer for whatever apps you wish to install.
- Performance score: 4.5/5
The 8849 Tank 5 is the most technically accomplished rugged projector phone yet made. It takes the Tank X's headline concept and delivers a genuine performance upgrade at every level. The Dimensity 9400e is fast. The 3K AMOLED display is bright. The 17,600mAh battery is enormous. The projector is now 2K capable with laser autofocus at four metres.
None of that comes without compromise.
The device is very heavy, and the projector still benefits from darkness, whatever the spec sheet implies. And the lack of a published software update policy is a concern worth flagging for any buyer planning to keep this device for several years.
For the specific buyer this device is designed for, the Tank 5 is a compelling proposition. It does things no other phone can match in a single chassis. That remains, as it has been throughout the Tank series, both its greatest strength and its clearest self-selection filter.
Yes, it might have the ideal characteristics to make a decent boat anchor, but when you pack this much technology into a phone, it was never going to be lightweight and slim.
Should I buy a 8849 Tank 5?8849 Tank 5 Score CardAttributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Probably the right price for a phone with such high specs.
4.5/5
Design
Thick and heavy, but nicely finished and presented.
4/5
Hardware
Excellent SoC, gorgeous AMOLED display and fast charging battery
4.5/5
Camera
Practical sensors for those recording for the workplace
4/5
Performance
Powerful Dimensity 9400e and full charge in 90 minutes battery
4.5/5
Overall
Best phone with a projector so far
4.5/5
Buy it if...You love adventure
This is the perfect device if you work or adventure in environments where battery life is critical and multi-day use without a charger is a regular requirement. I’m not sure you would want to hike with hardware this heavy, but for a rugged device for capturing images and video and then projecting them, it's exceptional.
You carry lots of data or apps
With 512GB of storage and 16GB of RAM, this phone is ideal for those who like to carry data and install numerous apps. And, if you give up a SIM card slot, you can add a MicroSD card for even more space.
You travel light
For some, a phone weighing more than 700g is a practical dealbreaker, and it's so big that it won't easily fit in a pocket. It could be a serious issue if you fall into water.
You don't need a projector
The cost of this device is tied to its feature set, and so if you don't want the projector, there seems little point in buying this. Other rugged designs with this SoC, memory and storage are available for less than 8849 is asking for the Tank 5.
8849 Tank X
A predecessor to the Tank X. It features a less powerful SoC, a lower resolution and brightness projector, but the same battery capacity. The biggest weakness of this design is how slowly, compared to the Tank 5, the battery recharges. However, it is a little cheaper for those looking to save money.
Check out my full 8849 Tank X review
ThinkPhone 25 by Motorola
The ThinkPhone 25 offers a powerful SoC, robust package, practical form factor, high-quality camera sensors and decent battery life at a mid-range price point. But, it’s not available in the USA, sadly.
Read our ThinkPhone 25 by Motorola reviewView Deal
For more ruggedized devices, we've reviewed the best rugged tablets, the best rugged laptops, and the best rugged hard drives
- US DOJ has seized nearly 400 domains
- The sites were being used to illegally stream World Cup games
- Users of the sites were exposed to malware, data theft, and other threats
Almost 400 domains have been seized as part of Operation Offsides - a coordinated global effort to take down sites illegally streaming the FIFA World Cup 2026.
The sites were seized by the US Justice Department's Criminal Division for violating copyright and intellectual property law.
The takedowns were coordinated by members of the International Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (ICHIP) network.
US and friends enforce the offside ruleMany of the seized domains now display a banner explaining that the website was seized as part of Operation Offsides. “This action was taken to protect consumers and enforce intellectual property rights worldwide,” the banner states.
(Image credit: U.S. Justice Department)Back in May 2026, the FBI warned that thousands of domains were being registered ahead of the World Cup, with most set up with the intention to scam fans looking for cheap tickets, access to streaming services, and those looking for discounted merchandise. It appears that Operation Offside was focused on disrupting streaming sites in particular, rather than taking down the wider scam networks associated with these domains.
“We have seized hundreds of domains, used to illegally stream World Cup matches for profit, to disrupt the international networks that profit from the global popularity of the World Cup,” said Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.
“This operation illustrates the Department’s respect for intellectual property rights and the responsibility of the United States as a host nation to protect the FIFA World Cup from criminals. The Criminal Division will continue to disrupt and, where appropriate, seek to prosecute these sites and the subjects responsible for this criminal activity.”
In many cases, the networks of fake domains offering cheap or free access to streaming services are run by cybercriminals deliberately operating at a loss in order to attract users to their services. In return for accessing the streaming site, the domain will use the user’s local network as an exit node for the cybercriminal network, obscuring their traffic and making it appear legitimate.
Unfortunately for the user, who may think they have just found free access to every World Cup game, their network and IP address could be used to distribute malware, cybercriminal communications, and illegal content such as stolen data and exploitative materials - including child sex abuse material.