Error message

  • Deprecated function: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_display has a deprecated constructor in require_once() (line 3080 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_many_to_one_helper has a deprecated constructor in require_once() (line 113 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/modules/ctools/ctools.module).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6401 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2386 of /home/ewg56ffgqu3p/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

News

iCloud Storage Full Yet Again? Here's a Fast Fix - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:01
I didn't move all my files, but in just 15 minutes I made a big dent.
SpaceX, Explained: 8 Things That Matter the Most After the IPO - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:01
Some days, Elon Musk is worth $1 trillion. Other days, he's merely an absurdly wealthy billionaire.
TCL QM8L TV Review: Super Quantum Dots Save the Day - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:08
The TCL QM8L improves on the previous version with ultra-high brightness and excellent picture quality.
July Movie Nights With 7 of the Best A24 Movies You Can Stream Free - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 10:01
A new batch of A24 films, including Everything Everywhere All At Once and Lady Bird, arrives this July on free streaming services.
Breaking Up With Your Broadband Provider? Here’s How to Cancel Your Internet in 5 Simple Steps - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 11:00
Whether you’re moving to a new home or just moving on, here’s how to dump your ISP with minimal hassle.
A Private Eye With a Supernatural Secret? This Sci-Fi Noir Series Is an Absolute Must-See - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 12:00
Commentary: Sugar is a sharply written tribute to classic movies, featuring lush visuals and a cool soundtrack. Now in its second season, Colin Farrell's stoic performance makes this series another win for Apple TV.
Amazon Leo Is Ready to Begin Limited Internet Service Later This Year - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 13:18
But the satellite internet company has a long way to go to catch up to established rival Starlink.
Argentina vs. Cape Verde: Stream FIFA World Cup 2026 Match Live for Free - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 15:01
Can the tournament outsiders pull off a major shock against Lionel Messi and crew?
Gas vs wood pizza oven: the differences you need to know, plus our top oven recommendations - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 06:13

Forget BBQs, I'm all about outdoor pizzas this year. If you want to hop on the homemade pizza bandwagon (welcome, there's plenty of space!), then now's a good time to get yourself set up with a pizza oven. Making your own pizzas is fun and satisfying, and the results are so much more delicious than oven pizzas or takeaway. If you're short on time or not especially gifted in the kitchen, it's pretty easy to find premade dough base balls that you can just roll out and add toppings to (this is my preferred method).

When picking a pizza oven, your main decision will be the type of fuel you want it to run on. Most modern pizza ovens — including the one I have at home — run on gas, which is speedy, convenient, and easy to control by just adjusting a dial. Another option is to opt for wood, which gives that delicious smokey smell and taste (although your pizzas won't be cooking for very long, so the impact won't be massive), but requires more effort to control the temperature.

There are a few 'multi-fuel' pizza ovens that can be used with either wood or gas. Alternatively, you could opt for an electric pizza oven. These are ultra-convenient, easy to control and versatile too. However, they tend not to get as hot as the other options, and you lose that authentic experience and charred flavor.

Below, I've rounded up some of our favorite pizza ovens. If you want to see how these options compare, hop to the bottom of the page for a specs comparison table.

Gas pizza ovens

I tend to think of gas pizza ovens as a 'happy medium' option. They can reach scorching temperatures, so you'll get those authentic charred edges, but are reliable to use and it's easy to adjust the heat up or down.

You won't get the 'smokey' wood-fired flavor — however, given your pizza's only going to be in there for a couple of minutes max, the difference isn't going to be nearly as noticeable as, for instance, using a gas versus charcoal BBQ.

Ooni Koda 16 Gas Pizza Oven

Ooni Koda 12 Gas Pizza Oven

ZANUSSI ZGPO1PC Gas Powered Pizza Oven

Gozney Arc XL

Read our full review

Pros
  • Larger pizzas
  • More stable temperatures
  • Digital thermometer
Cons
  • Not portable
  • No door for fast heat up
  • No wood-fire option

Jamie Oliver by Tefal Outdoor Gas Pizza Oven, Rotating Stone

Wood fired pizza ovens

Wood fired pizza ovens run on pellets. Like gas options, they can get super-hot, but controlling the temperatures is trickier — it requires adjusting the vents and adding fuel. You'll also need to deal with the ash leftover afterwards. However, you will get the delicious smokey smell, and a more traditional cooking experience.

GEORGE FOREMAN Outdoor 12-inch Wood Pellet Pizza Oven

George Foreman Outdoor 16-inch Wood Pellet Pizza Oven

Zanussi ZPO1BPC Outdoor 12-inch Wood Pellet Portable Pizza Oven

Electric pizza ovens

An electric pizza oven won't give you that unique cooking experience; instead, it'll be a lot more like using an air fryer or regular oven. They also tend not to have a lower maximum temperature, so it's trickier to achieve those crispy bases and charred edges. However, what you lose in authenticity you gain in convenience — you can control temperatures precisely, and the results are very predictable.

Ninja Artisan Electric Outdoor Pizza Oven & Air Fryer MO201UK

Ooni Volt 2 Electric Pizza Oven

Ninja Woodfire 8-In-1 Electric Outdoor Oven, Pizza Oven & Smoker

Multi-fuel pizza ovens

Ooni Karu 2 Multi Fuel Portable Outdoor Pizza Oven

Gozney Dome (gen 2) Multi Fuel Outdoor Pizza Oven

Pizza oven specs compared
Look mom, no app: these premium headphones throw the logic of your Sonys or Boses out the window in favor of a 'Still Mode' to stay calm, and I’m all for it - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 06:26
  • Daisy One: new headphones from a new brand — and they're not cheap
  • No app, heavier than average build, smaller drivers…
  • …but I truly think the dedicated on-ear 'Still Mode' button could be a winner

You’ve never heard of Daisy (the Californian tech company; you may have heard of the flower) but it wants you to hear of it. Or hear it…’s debut over-ear headphones, which are called the Daisy One.

These new cans retail at the not-insignificant price point of $399 / £364 (about AU$700), money which could, it's important to say, be buying you some Sony or Bose cans. So why buy these instead? Refreshingly, rather than play the heavy-hitters at their own game, Daisy's throwing out the rule book on how to convince you.

Take the cans’ audio chops; instead of using the same 40mm drivers that almost everyone opts for, Daisy’s gone for a 35mm option, tuned by former Harman engineers and weighted towards the low-end. That’s pretty uncommon in pricier wireless models, where neutral sound is the typically the goal.

Then there’s the design: it’s heavier than average, at 318g, and uses a more slender, metallic look than your average over-ears and comes in silver, dark green or blue (no traditional 'charcoal' option here).

Perhaps the biggest selling point — something many brands (and reviewers) could consider a minus — is the lack of an app. Instead, controls are done on the headphone, with a dial for volume controls and play/pause, and a dedicated button that plays soundscapes recorded from around California. And what a dial/button it is! It puts me in mind of Montblanc's bijou earbuds or indeed the tip of a Montblanc pen.

What this button offers is called the 'Still Mode', and it includes access to rainfall sounds, five-minute breathwork tracks, ocean tides and more, but from the headphones themselves — ie. without the need to open an app or keep your phone connected to its source device.

There is a noise cancellation listed on the spec sheet too, but perhaps Daisy knows it can't beat the class-leaders at that game. Where most flagship cans want to give you silence with ever-improved ANC algorithms, Daisy is pushing a different route straight to the desired effect of said silence: a calmer mind — and one that is better able to focus.

Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do

(Image credit: Daisy)

By turning traditional headphone flaws (see the lack of an app and a slightly smaller driver) into selling points, Daisy makes it clear that it’s trying something different.

It’s not clear if that’s by design, or by accident. In an interview with Wired, company CEO Jack Mulroe confirmed the designers were “from outside the audio industry”. So the brand brings some fresh perspectives, but potentially some shortcomings — Mulroe admits “I tweaked out on transparency for months” when trying to fix its issues.

In recent years, we’ve seen that headphone fans will welcome in new brands, perhaps more so than in other tech sectors. The likes of the CMF Headphone Pro, Nothing Headphone (a) and Soundcore Space 2 have proven popular (at least, I’ve seen people out and about wearing them) and you can see from the very end of the next train carriage that they’re not from the traditional Sony, Bose or Sennheiser roster.

We've seen other headphone startups try to help wearers stay calm and focus, albeit using very different tech. Take Neurable's 'brain-hacking' headphones, which monitor your brain activity while you wear them and thus aim to help you achieve a flow state. But Daisy's this approach is different again, and it does strike me that by taking a more hands-off approach (and leaving our gray matter alone) Daisy's approach perhaps sounds more conducive to calmness…

Ultimately, it’s always good to see a new brands step up to the plate, especially if it thinks it can do things differently to the big dogs. It’ll be very interesting to see what impact the Daisy One has, and where the company goes from here.

(Image credit: Daisy )
Two of the world's fastest-growing skills are in the same job description - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 06:30

If you look at where global skills demand is climbing fastest right now, two areas are pretty hard to ignore: artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.

According to the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, AI and big data sit at the top of the fastest-growing skills ranking, with networks and cybersecurity directly behind.

These skills are increasingly being asked of the same person.

For most of the last decade, these were distinct careers.

Cybersecurity professionals attended cybersecurity conferences, earned cybersecurity certifications and worked in cybersecurity teams.

AI and machine learning sat elsewhere in data science org charts, research labs, product groups.

The two communities knew about each other. They rarely shared a calendar.

Security teams are now expected to manage AI systems

That separation has collapsed in the last 18 months or so, mostly because security teams are now expected to deploy, oversee and defend AI systems as a routine part of their work.

Research finds that 87% of security teams are prioritizing agentic AI adoption, with 77% of cybersecurity professionals comfortable letting these systems take action without human review. Adoption is happening fast. Demand for people capable of managing that adoption is growing accordingly. And the talent pool, predictably, has not caught up.

“Hybrid skills” is the operative phrase right now. Research finds that 59% of security professionals expect demand for hybrid skills to climb over the next three to five years. What hybrid means here is pretty specific. You need someone who understands attack surfaces and can also interrogate why a model behaved the way it did.

That same person has to have compliance literacy and be able to evaluate whether a deployed system is drifting from its intended behavior. And also be able to talk to engineers about adversarial inputs in the morning and to a general counsel about regulatory exposure in the afternoon.

That's a lot of capability for one job description. But it’s what’s happening.

Active demand and under-supplied

This profile barely existed as a hiring category two years ago. Today it's in active demand and naturally under-supplied. According to the World Economic Forum, only 14% of organization's have the skilled talent they need to meet their cybersecurity objectives.

And that figure becomes more uncomfortable when you remember that the bar keeps moving. AI literacy is now part of meeting cybersecurity objectives. A team that was adequate 18 months ago may not be adequate now, through no fault of their own.

External recruiting is not going to be a panacea for most companies. The supply of candidates who already combine deep security expertise with AI fluency and regulatory awareness is thin enough that aggressive hiring against this profile produces long, expensive vacancies and a lot of bruised hiring managers.

Which means most companies will have to grow these professionals internally. That looks like routing existing security staff through AI literacy training, embedding compliance professionals with model engineering teams, or rotating talent across both functions deliberately enough that the hybrid skill set develops as a byproduct.

This is a longer game than most CISOs and HR leaders want to play.

A real opportunity for cybersecurity professionals

Understandably, at least on the surface. It produces dividends in 12 to 24 months, in a discipline where the threat surface changes every month.

But the alternative is worse. Continuing to hire based on the old talent profile means continuing to deploy AI systems that nobody on the security team is fully equipped to govern, which means continuing to accumulate organizational risk that compounds quietly until it surfaces all at once. And it always surfaces.

There is a real opportunity buried in this for cybersecurity professionals reading the same data. It used to be that a career path like this one would plateau around senior analyst or security architect. Now it extends into AI risk leadership, AI governance, model security and adjacent roles that essentially didn’t exist as career destinations three years ago.

If you're a practitioner who adds AI literacy to existing security depth, you are positioning yourself for roles that are scarce, valuable and likely to remain so for at least the rest of the decade.

For employers, the takeaway probably feels less shiny, but it’s no less urgent.

The cybersecurity workforce of 2030

The cybersecurity workforce of 2030 is being trained right now, mostly by companies willing to invest in development before the market makes it cheap to hire ready-made talent.

There may not be an explosion of market talent, because they’re already in house. That means you really can’t wait around for these unicorn skill sets to hit the talent market. Instead, you have to cultivate them.

Look at your existing security and compliance teams. Find the people with curiosity about how AI systems work. Invest in them now.

The organizations that move first will be the ones best prepared to secure what comes next.

We've reviewed and ranked the best HR software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

Spotify confirms it’s fixing a major playlist organization problem — and this boost to ‘Your Library’ pinning is something I’ve wanted for years - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 06:37

One of my favorite things about the best music streaming services is that they’ve evolved into more than just audio platforms — they give you the freedom to create your own digital music space.

Take Spotify for example, the platform I’ve been using for over a decade. Not only does its algorithm learn to understand your tastes (though it takes quite a bit of time and effort to train it), creating playlists and folders gives you another way to make your Spotify space your own.

One of Spotify’s most handy features is pins, which places select playlists, albums, and artists, as well as audiobooks and podcasts to the top of your Library for quick and easy access, but the four-pin limit is a pain point that pretty much every subscriber has been asking Spotify to upgrade since the pins feature was rolled out some five years ago.

In the case of Apple Music, you can pin up to six different items which, while it’s still a small number, is better than four. Users have been begging Spotify to increase this number for years — and you’ll be relieved to learn that change is finally coming.

(Image credit: Future)From 4 to 20

I first spotted signs of a possible update after coming across a Reddit post (see below) in which a user shared that they had somehow found a way to pin more than four items in their Library. Apparently all they did was update their Spotify app, but other users responding in the comments saw no such change — myself included.

[Breaking | Pins] Look how many things I have pinned :) Update your app now. from r/truespotify

After coming across the post, I reached out to Spotify, which confirmed that it’s increasing the four-pin limit, which was one of the improvements I wanted the most in 2026. A spokesperson shared the following comment:

“Spotify is updating the number of items listeners can pin at the top of Your Library from 4 to 20. This gives our users more flexibility to keep the music, playlists, podcasts, audiobooks, and creators they care about most within easy reach. It's still rolling out and will be available for Free and Premium listeners around the world in the next month”.

Why pine for more pins?

I can imagine many people will read this and question the fuss over such a small feature, but there’s a lot more to it. For those who are seasoned Spotify users, the platform is much more than a music haven — it’s their source for podcasts and audiobooks.

When you factor this in, having only four pins across music, podcasts, and audiobooks is rather stingy — "Does Spotify think we only listen to 1 of each at a time?", someone commented on the post shared to the Spotify Community page. But it’s not just about being able to pin music, podcasts, and audiobooks simultaneously; it’s about enhancing the user experience.

Whenever you follow a new artist, pre-save an upcoming album, or save a new playlist, it all appears as one messy collection in Your Library. This forces you to scroll through a hoarding eyesore to find what it is you’re looking for, so pinning items bumps your most-used content to the top saving you bags of scrolling time.

Though you can simply search for the playlist you want to listen to, regular listeners have tons of them (I know I do), so it’s much easier having all of your music there at the tap of a button in Your Library. For others, it’s about more than making your playlists easier to navigate; it's about having more say in how you choose to curate your digital music collection — “we should get full control”, another user puts it plainly.

All things considered, then, avid Spotify users everywhere will welcome this update with open arms.

The Jackery Explorer 1000 V2 is 'one of the best portable power stations' we've ever tested — and it's plummeted in price at Amazon this summer - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 06:59

If you're looking for reliable backup power for your home, camping trips, or weather emergencies, the Jackery Explorer 1000 V2 is one of the best portable power stations we've ever tested.

Right now, the Explorer 1000 V2 is down to $449 (was $799) at Amazon, which is a solid $350 discount. And for readers in the UK, the power station has dropped to £379 (was £419) at Amazon.co.uk.

That makes an already excellent power station even better value. Whether you're preparing for unexpected outages, planning weekends away, or simply want dependable portable power for work and recreation, the Explorer 1000 V2 offers an impressive balance of capacity, performance, and portability.

Today's top Jackery portable power station deal

This portable power station delivers 1070Wh capacity with 1500W output, making it suitable for running household essentials, devices, and tools. Fast one-hour charging keeps downtime short, while multiple AC, USB, and DC ports allow several devices to run simultaneously.

In the UK: now £379 (was £419)View Deal

In our rave review, we said the "Jackery Explorer 1000 V2 is one of the best portable power stations around, a solid choice and one of the most robust and reliable options available." It scored 4.5 stars and earned a TechRadar Pro Highly Recommended badge.

Its 1070Wh battery and 1500W continuous power output are enough to run a wide range of everyday devices, including laptops, refrigerators, lights, routers, and small kitchen appliances. A 3000W surge capacity also helps when powering devices that require extra energy to start up.

The battery can recharge from empty to full in around an hour, making it ideal if you're heading off on a last-minute camping trip or need to get backup power ready before severe weather arrives.

The Explorer 1000 V2 includes three pure sine wave AC outlets alongside multiple USB ports and a 12V car outlet, allowing you to power several devices simultaneously without relying on additional adapters.

The unit weighs just under 24 pounds and includes a sturdy carry handle, making it easy to move between rooms, load into a vehicle, or carry around a campsite.

It also supports UPS functionality with a switching time of under 20 milliseconds, helping desktop PCs and other sensitive electronics continue running if the mains power suddenly fails.

The lithium iron phosphate battery is rated for up to 4,000 charge cycles, providing years of dependable service, while the companion app lets you monitor the battery and adjust charging settings directly from your phone.

For more choices, check out the best portable power stations we've tested and reviewed.

I tried Clean Up in the iOS 27 developer beta, and Apple's AI-powered image editing tool is finally worth using — but there's a big caveat - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 07:00

For a company that prides itself on delivering polished, functioning hardware and software, Apple dropped the ball with its original AI-powered Clean Up tool.

Not only did this Apple Intelligence feature arrive almost a year after similar tools from Samsung and Google, but by all accounts, it was objectively worse at removing unwanted objects in images than those big-name rivals. We tested Clean Up against Galaxy AI last year, and found that the former “comes incredibly short of the mark when Samsung’s offering is capable of truly achieving what it sets out to do.” Ouch.

But Apple has promised to make things right in iOS 27. At WWDC 2026, the company announced that Clean Up will be faster and more capable in your iPhone’s next software update — and so I put that claim to the test by comparing Clean Up as it exists in iOS 26 against Clean Up as it exists in the iOS 27 developer beta (if you’re keen to try an early version of iOS 27 for yourself, here’s how to download the iOS 27 developer beta).

Before we dive into the image comparisons, an important note: Clean Up is better in iOS 27 because it’s capable of engaging Apple’s powerful Foundation models when needed. Say, for instance, you want to remove an obstruction from your face; your iPhone will employ a ‘High Quality’ version of Clean Up that taps into Apple’s own Private Cloud Compute servers to access these Foundation models. But it doesn’t do this all the time.

For small touch-up jobs, your iPhone employs a ‘Fast’ version of Clean Up that uses Apple's on-device AI models to complete your request, just as it does in iOS 26 (albeit not under this 'Fast' banner). This version is (surprise!) faster than the ‘High Quality’ alternative, but it's also not as effective at removing objects.

In iOS 27, your iPhone defaults to using an ‘Auto’ version of Clean Up that switches between ‘High Quality’ and ‘Fast’ depending on the edit request you’re making, but you can force your iPhone to use one or the other by selecting your chosen mode in a drop-down menu.

The new Clean Up options in iOS 27 (Image credit: Future)

For this comparison, I stuck to ‘Auto’ to test how well my iPhone recognizes when (and when not) to use the more power-intensive ‘High Quality’ version of Clean Up — and because most people will use Clean Up in this default ‘Auto’ mode. I also wanted to see whether ‘Fast’ in iOS 27 — which my iPhone surely used for a few of the photos below — is more effective than it is in iOS 26.

I've added a separate section for comparing ‘Fast’ and ‘High Quality’ results in iOS 27, which is the starkest example of how much Apple's Clean Up tool has been improved.

And, of course, my results are based on the iOS 27 developer beta, not the finished version of iOS 27. There's every chance that Clean Up will be improved further once iOS 27 proper arrives later this year.

Photo comparisonsOriginal imageFuture / Axel MetzFuture / Axel MetzFuture / Axel Metz

In this first example, iOS 26 leaves behind an unnatural smear in place of the dog, while iOS 27 adds a more detailed, natural-looking replacement. The latter looks more like a bush than grass — and the end of the dog's tail is still visible in both examples — but iOS 27 delivers the better overall result.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

iOS 26 actually delivers the better result here, leaving behind a slightly less visible L-shape than iOS 27. I suspect this is an example of that 'Fast' version of Clean Up in action, and that if I manually selected 'High Quality', the iOS 27 version would be superior (see the 'Fast' vs 'High Quality' comparison at the bottom of the page to see what I mean). This comparison also proves that 'Fast' in iOS 27 doesn't always deliver superior results to Clean Up in iOS 26 (at least as far as the developer beta goes).

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

Again, I'd say iOS 26 delivers the better result in this example — focus on the llama's erased head in both photos to see what I mean.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel MetzOriginal imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

This is the first example in which I'm convinced my iOS 27-enabled iPhone switched from 'Fast' to 'High Quality'. When asking Clean Up to remove the long strands of hair over my left eye, the iOS 26 version completely botches the job, adding random ugly smears and not actually removing anything. The iOS 27 version, meanwhile, serves up a genuinely impressive result. It's not completely devoid of fakery, but it's certainly the more usable of the two results.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

Now you see him, now you don't. At first glance, both iOS 26 and iOS 27 appear to do a similarly OK job at removing Bad Bunny from the roof of La Casita, but if you look closely, iOS 26 doesn't recognize that there are stairs behind him. The iOS 27 result isn't that much better, but it's the objectively superior of the two.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

Another slim win for iOS 27 here. Neither version of Clean Up completely removes the dog's shadow, but iOS 27 makes a slightly better go of it than iOS 26.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

In this example, the iOS 27 result is the much better of the two. Not only does iOS 26 leave behind a smeary cloud, but it also adds a random shape and (badly) generates an extra helping of mountain in the background. None of these mistakes are visible in the iOS 27 result.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

iOS 27 wins again here, but not by much. The dark splodges left behind in the iOS 26 result are a tad more visible than those in the iOS 27 result, and I'd be more comfortable passing the latter off as reality.

Original imageFuture / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 26Future / Axel MetzClean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

This is probably the most challenging request of the bunch. I'm sitting on a backless bench while pedalling a piece of urban gym equipment, and I asked Clean Up to remove me, but keep everything else intact. iOS 26 fails miserably, and while iOS 27 doesn't totally succeed either — it leaves my right foot behind and removes the end of the bench entirely — it does do a better job of replacing what it removes with real-looking imagery.

Fast vs High Quality in iOS 27

Here's an example of the different results you can achieve by manually selecting the 'Fast' and 'High Quality' versions of Clean Up in iOS 27.

Original imageFuture / Axel Metz'Fast' version of Clean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz'High quality' version of Clean Up in iOS 27Future / Axel Metz

As you can see, the difference is huge. The 'Fast' result is a total mess, while the 'High Quality' result is genuinely real-looking. The latter isn't perfect — it's changed the menu art, for instance, and reduced the menu count from two to one — but I suspect that's because a portion of the menu was caught in the circle I drew around the coffee cup (and for that reason, I hope Apple reduces the thickness of the Clean Up line when iOS 27 releases in full later this year).

First impressions

In all but three of the comparisons, the iOS 27 developer beta version of Clean Up delivered the better result; however, it's clear that, when your iPhone opts for the 'Fast' version of the feature, the gulf in quality is not dramatic. In fact, in some examples, the iOS 26 result is better — so it's probably best to think of 'Fast' Clean Up and iOS 26 Clean Up as the same tool.

It's a different story for the 'High Quality' version of Clean Up in the iOS 27 developer beta, which delivered vastly superior results to Clean Up in iOS 26 when my iPhone auto-selected that option, or when I manually enabled it (as in the coffee cup example).

This proves beyond doubt that Apple has improved Clean Up in iOS 27 as it exists right now — but unless users manually select this 'High Quality' option (or always request complex edits that trigger its automatic use), the difference in Clean Up's capabilities may not be all that noticeable.

Again, though, I've been careful to specify that these iOS 27 results are from the developer beta — Apple will likely further tweak Clean Up between now and iOS 27's September release, so I expect the tool to get even better.

Apple's iPhone Ultra could raise foldable prices by almost 20% — no wonder Samsung isn't scared of its arrival - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 07:18
  • A new report suggests foldable phone prices could rise by 18% this year
  • That's in part due to the iPhone Ultra, which could launch at a very high price
  • Samsung and other brands may well cash in on this market shift

2026 could be one of the biggest years for foldable phones yet, as the foldable iPhone Ultra looks set to finally arrive in September. But while that’s sure to excite anyone who’s been waiting for an Apple-made foldable, it could also come with some bad news for consumers.

You see, according to a recent Counterpoint Research report (via 9to5Mac), the average price of foldable phones could rise by as much as 18% this year, and that increase will in part be thanks to Apple’s upcoming model.

Specifically, the average price is predicted to rise to $1,485 (roughly £1,110 / AU$2,140), and that’s in part because the iPhone Ultra itself will probably cost significantly more than that, with a recent IDC report predicting that the phone could retail for as much as $2,500 (around £1,870 / AU$3,600) — and that might just be the starting price.

This being an iPhone, it’s sure to be popular and could therefore drive up the average price of foldable phones. But its impact might extend to other brands too, because a $2,500 foldable iPhone could make such prices more palatable when attached to phones from Samsung and other companies.

A welcome rival

Clamshell models like the Galaxy Z Flip 7 could soon cost less (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

With this in mind, it’s perhaps no surprise that a Samsung exec said last year that the Korean giant is “welcoming others to join this category,” in response to a question about the iPhone Ultra’s arrival.

Don’t be surprised, then, if future Samsung foldables cost more than current ones — and not just because of rising RAM prices and inflation, but also because of the Apple impact.

Still, this Counterpoint report has some good pricing news too, as while it predicts that book-style foldables will continue increasing in price, clamshell models are expected to fall in price on average, bringing them “closer to premium bar-type smartphone alternatives.”

So while book-style foldables might start feeling even further out of reach for a lot of buyers, clamshell models could become increasingly attainable.

Xerox C255a review: I much prefer Xerox’s reboot of Lexmark’s laser printer - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 07:21
Specs

Type: color multifunction laser printer

Functions: Print, scan, copy, fax, ADF

Connectivity: Ethernet, USB, Wi-Fi

Data storage slots: USB Host

Max print speed: 25ppm

Max paper size: Letter / A4

Print quality: 600x600 dpi (4,800 dpi color)

Memory: 1GB

Apple AirPrint: yes

Consumables included: 4 x toner cartridges (750 black, 500 color pages)

Dimensions: 16.18 x 15.71 x 13.58in (411 x 399 x 345 mm (WxDxH)

Weight: 42.9lbs/19.5kg

The first real fruit of the Xerox/Lexmark collaboration is a mid-priced multifunction laser printer aimed at hybrid workers and small businesses looking for high performance from a compact device that doesn’t need IT support.

It’s essentially Lexmark hardware with Xerox software and support, which sounds to me like the best of both worlds. The Lexmark print engine has proved fast and efficient in the past, but I much prefer the Xerox interface and Easy Assist App, so let’s see if this middle-of-the-road office all-in-one is worthy to wear the refreshed Xerox logo.

Xerox C255a: Design and build

(Image credit: Future)

The Xerox C255a is impressively compact for a four-in-one device with two paper inputs and a 50-sheet automatic document feeder (ADF). The main tray can hold up to 250 sheets of A4 or letter paper, while the slot-loading multipurpose tray is for single sheets or envelopes. It’s smaller than the Brother MFC-L8970CDW in all dimensions, which is good, but it’s a pity the display is less than half that printer’s size at just 2.8 inches. At least there’s a USB Host port beside the front panel, in addition to the USB data port at the rear.

It looks much like the Lexmark MC3326i on which this new model is based, except that it now has a playfully shaped plastic front panel that bends its top right corner outwards just enough to look like a furling sheet of paper, while offering an easy way to open up the toner compartment door. The black and gray livery looks smart and it’s showcasing the reworked Xerox logo, which now features a kind of crosshead screw icon that looks like a nod to Lexmark’s green square logo.

It’s reassuringly heavy at just under 20kg or 43lbs and it feels well made, from fifty percent recycled plastic. The toner cartridges lock into place with a satisfying click and the paper drawer opens smoothly. In short, build quality is a strong point. You can even add an optional swivel cabinet or adjustable stand, but sadly, you can’t add another paper cassette.

Xerox C255a: Features & specifications

(Image credit: Future)

As the company’s mid-priced model, the Xerox C255a has all the features on my check list to be among the best small business printers. Wi-Fi with AirPrint and Chromebook compatibility is built in, there’s a USB flash memory slot, strong security and a manual paper feed in addition to the main tray. It can auto duplex print, of course, but it can’t auto duplex scan. That feature is reserved for the step-up Xerox C325.

The print rate is also appreciably slower than the Xerox C325. That said, our Xerox C255a is no slouch at 26ppm (pages per minute) in simplex mode and it doesn’t slow down much when duplexing. I think it’s fast enough for the needs of most businesses.

Print resolution is the usual 600x600 DPI which matches the scan resolution, while color printing is enhanced to 4,800 DPI. The 1GHz processor and 1GB of RAM is an improvement on the old Lexmark and Xerox’s recommended duty cycle of up to 50,000 pages per month suggests that this is a printer that can handle a very heavy workload.

Xerox C255a: Setup and operation

(Image credit: Future)

I found the setup procedure to be quick and painless and did not need to reach for the single-page quick start guide. You just have to remove all the transport packaging, load your paper, power up and follow the on-screen prompts to get online and print the first test page.

The inbuilt 2.8-inch display is rather small, but it’s intuitive and Xerox’s setup procedure makes it easy to link your smartphone so you can use the helpful Easy Assist companion app to get your printer onto your Wi-Fi network for the first time.

Day-to-day operation is simplified by the user-friendly OS which I think Xerox always did better than Lexmark. The Lexmark MC3326i always suffered from a lazy touchscreen and more convoluted menu system, which I’m happy to say has been much improved.

Xerox C255a: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

Firstly, the pages of crisp dark text on plain paper pumped out by the Xerox C255a look great and explain why Xerox was so keen to purchase Lexmark’s print engine. It’s not the quietest laser printer in its class, nor the fastest, but the black on white print quality is consistently excellent. Characters printed at small point sizes always appear legible and well delineated when viewed through a magnifying glass.

Mixed color documents are less impressive because the C/M/Y toner, which doesn’t appear to have changed since the Lexmark days, is somewhat dull. The color tones are actually quite natural and consistent, but they certainly don’t pop in the way that they do with the HP Color LaserJet Pro 4201dw, for example. I don’t think this is a problem for printing handouts and reports etc, but photographs, even when printed on laser photo paper, tend to look flat and disappointing.

The scanner bed and ADF both worked flawlessly during the tests and made accurate multipage copies swiftly and without paper jams. The duplicates appeared noticeably paler than the originals, but not enough to be a problem. As a digital copier, the Xerox C255a is fine, but without single-pass dual scanning, that’s not its strongest suit.

Xerox C255a: Consumables

(Image credit: Future)

The Xerox C255a ships with four pre-loaded starter cartridges containing just enough toner to print 750 black and pages, or 500 in color. That means they’re less than a third full because Xerox’s standard carts yield 1,200 color and 1,300 black pages, while the high-capacity carts yield up to 2500 color and 3,000 black pages.

With the highest yield black Xerox cartridges costing around US$100 or £98, the cost per page can be reasonably competitive, although it’s by no means the lowest running cost among laser printers in this class.

Apart from the badge, the cartridges look identical to those of the Lexmark MC33261i and contain the same toner, so we can assume they’re compatible.

Xerox C255a: Maintenance

(Image credit: Future)

Apart from replacing the toner cartridges, the Xerox C255a may require a new waste toner cartridge costing around $20 when the original becomes full.

The imaging drums are not built into the toner cartridges in this case, so they will also need to be swapped out if you notice serious deterioration in print quality or you receive the dreaded ‘Replace Drum’ message on the display.

None of those things should happen before around 40,000 prints, so I’d say this is a low-maintenance device.

Xerox C255a: Final verdictFutureFutureFutureFutureFuture

The Xerox C255a performed well enough in all of my tests to recommend it to both home workers with high print demands and small businesses in a shared office. It’s compact enough to sit on your desk at home, while also having the print speed and paper/ink capacity to serve a small workgroup, and thanks to the intuitive touchscreen interface and strong app support, you’re unlikely to need IT backup.

It’s not the quietest of laser printers, nor the fastest and it lacks high-end features like NFC or single-pass dual scanning, but crucially, it does have all the essentials, such as Wi-Fi with AirPrint, an ADF and robust security. There’s not much toner in the starter cartridges, but Xerox’s high-yield refills are reasonably priced. Build quality is also reassuringly solid and having tested the Lexmark on which this Xerox is based, I can confirm that it’s a genuine improvement rather than just a rebrand.

For more top-rated options, I've tested out the best home printers and the best laser printers.

New report claims companies which embrace AI also add more workers (eventually) - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 07:25
  • Companies going all-in on AI are also seeing positive impacts on headcount
  • Entry-level roles saw higher-than-average growth, opposing existing research
  • Workforce gains aren't immediate – AI needs time to find its place within organizations

A new report has challenged the narrative that AI adoption has been leading to job losses, instead revealing that the companies making the biggest investments in AI are actually growing their workforces.

The study combines corporate AI spending data from Ramp's payment platform and workforce records from Revelio Labs to analyze more than 21,500 US companies, making it one of the biggest of its kind.

It concludes that high-intensity AI adopters increased their headcount by around 10% during the first two years after deploying AI, making AI good news for workers and labor after all.

AI adoption is causing companies to hire more workers

Clearly, only strong AI adoption has a positive impact on workers, because companies making modest investments didn't see any significant growth.

The study also stresses that the impacts are slow-growing – rather than seeing an immediate uptick in employment, it takes time for companies to integrate AI, discover productive use cases and hire more workers.

High adopters are defined as those who invested around $33 per employee per month during the first three months after adoption, compared with around $3 for low adopters.

It also challenges other recent research, asserting that entry-level employment actually rose by a higher-than-average 12% among high-intensity AI adopters. Other reports have implied that entry-level workers have been among the hardest hit.

Even though tech giants dominate the headlines, with Salesforce cutting nearly half of its support staff and Amazon notably cutting tens of thousands of workers, the Ramp/Revelio Labs report actually shows growth across more than just AI engineer roles, spanning sales, marketing, admin, finance, customer service and more.

While the research can't be used to predict long-term labor impacts, it does at least serve as a notice that workers aren't currently at risk of total redundancy, even amid job role shifts.

A stunning low light capture of a volcanic eruption in Guatemala sweeps the 2026 iPhone Photography Awards — and it was taken on an iPhone 15 Pro - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:12
  • iPhone Photography Awards 2026 winners announced, with top prize going to Robyn Jensen
  • Their winning image of a volcano eruption was taken on an iPhone 15 Pro
  • 12 other category winners announced, along with the varied iPhones used

The iPhone Photography Awards has announced its prize winners for 2026 — and the image that received the Grand Prix genuinely stopped me in my tracks.

Shot by Robyn Jensen from the Cayman Islands and submitted in the 'Nature' category, the winning image is a stunning low-light capture of a volcanic eruption in Yepocapa, Chimaltenango, Guatemala. Showing the moment a gout of ash erupts from the crater of the volcano, with red-hot trails cascading down around it, the image frames the moment of drama perfectly against a starlit night sky.

Winner, Grand Prix. Shot on iPhone 15 Pro, 6.765mm (24mm equiv), f/1.8, 1s, ISO 12500 (Image credit: Robyn Jensen)

What's more, this image wasn't even shot on the latest iPhone, but was captured on a phone two generations old — the iPhone 15 Pro. I love how effectively it uses the phone's inherent qualities to its advantage; for instance, the smaller sensor of the iPhone 15 Pro, or any smartphone, is going to have a more limited dynamic range than a mirrorless or premium compact camera.

Robyn has made use of that, exposing for the brightest spot in the image — the lava and the light it's casting on the underside of the ash cloud — and allowing the rest to be shrouded in darkness. This heightens the impact of the image, sacrificing detail in the mountain for legibility of the key subject. But fortunately, we just about get those beautiful stars in the background.

Robyn has also used the wider 24mm equivalent lens, resisting the temptation to zoom in with the telephoto, and doing this allows us to appreciate the moment in its fuller context, giving a sense of scale. Her exposure is a full second long, meaning either the phone was mounted to a support, or she was aided by the iPhone 15 Pro's excellent OIS (optical image stabilization). And the phone has pushed her ISO to 12,500, and still come away with a pretty clean shot. It's a superb image, and a deserving winner.

Right place, right time

Winner, Gold. Shot on iPhone X, 4mm (28mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/1500s, ISO 20 (Image credit: Gellért Gombai)

Something I particularly love about the iPhone Awards is the sheer breadth of style and subject matter, and this couldn't be better illustrated than by the contrast between Robyn's image and the winner of the Gold award, an image submitted in the 'Children' category by Hungarian photographer Gellért Gombai. A beautiful grab shot of a precious summer moment, its interplay of light and shadow is heightened by the decision to convert to monochrome — and it was shot on an even older phone, the iPhone X released in 2017!

And this sense of breadth continues when you look at the Silver and Bronze winners (below) — even though they're both by American photographers and are both images of animals! Arnold Plotnick's street shot of a cat, Silver winner, has a feel of total serendipity, a perfectly framed moment well-spotted. Also note how again, the lower dynamic range from the iPhone actually helps the image, with the loss of detail in the cat's fur and the doorway shadow increasing the shot's contrast and impact.

Winner, Silver. Shot on iPhone 16 Pro, 6.765mm (29mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/60s, ISO 320 Arnold PlotnickWinner, Bronze. Shot on iPhone 16 Pro Max, 6.765mm, f/1.8, 1/40s, ISO 250 Catherine Wang

Catherine Wang's Bronze winner, meanwhile, couldn't be more different. It's a meticulously set-up still life, with the elements of the watermelon, mug and parrot clearly having been arranged very precisely, and the end result looking like something from a gallery wall.

For me, almost all of the winning images exemplify one of the iPhone's strongest assets for photographers — it's the camera you always have on you. While there are exceptions, such as Catherine Wang's still-life, most of the images have the unmistakeable feel of grab shots, of a photographer who was at the right place at the right time, and had the means to make the most of it.

1st Place, Abstract. Shot on iPhone 8 Plus, 3.99mm (28mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/120s, ISO 50 Barry Mayes1st Place, Animals. Shot on iPhone 14 Pro, 9mm (77mm equiv), f/2.8, 1/400s, ISO 32 Peter Crome1st Place, Architecture. Shot on iPhone 17 Pro, 6.765mm (48mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/18s, ISO 1000 Ziwen Chen1st Place, Children. Shot on iPhone 15, 5.96mm (26mm equiv), f/1.6, 1/2500s, ISO 50 Krystal Rountree1st Place, Citylife/Cityscape. Shot on iPhone 17 Pro, 16.89mm (200mm equiv), f/2.8, 1/750s, ISO 20 Adrian Beasley1st Place, Landscape. Shot on iPhone 16 Pro Max, 6.765mm (24mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/12000s, ISO 80 Anthony Ginns1st Place, Lifestyle. Shot on iPhone 13 Pro, 9mm (77mm equiv), f/2.8, 1/1150s, ISO 32 Bertram Greenhough1st Place, Nature. Shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max, 6.86mm (48mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/1700s, ISO 64 Tianjiao Zhang1st Place, Other. Shot on iPhone 16 Pro, 2.22mm (17mm equiv), f/2.2, 1/6000s, ISO 32Deniss Aksjonovs1st Place, People. Shot on iPhone 12, 4.2mm (26mm equiv), f/1.6, 1/120s, ISO 40 Jenny DangWinner, Portrait. Shot on iPhone 15 Pro, 6.765mm (24mm equiv), f/1.8, 1/90s, ISO 200Brice PicardWinner, Series. Shot on iPhone 17 Pro, 16.8906mm (100mm equiv), f/2.8, 1/210s, ISO 40 Lasda Takbanuaz

Images like the pattern of frost on a car, a pair of dogs peeking out of a window, a child preparing for a leap over a puddle. These aren't things you set up; they're moments you spot, and many of them are moments that anyone might have spotted.

I'm particularly galled by the fact that the Gold prize was won by a shot of a cat in the street. Do you have any idea how shots of cats in the street I have on my camera roll? Loads! And do you have any idea how many of them are as good as Arnold Plotnick's? None!

But my personal bitterness notwithstanding, the iPhone Photography Awards have produced a superb crop of images this year, and in doing so have provided some pertinent reminders of two of photography's most important lessons. First, you don't need the latest tech to make great images. Second, the best camera is always — always — the one you have on you.

You can see the full selection of images, including second and third place winners, at the iPhone Photography Awards website.

I test headphones and earbuds for a living — these are the 8 standout releases of 2026 so far, from Apple, Marshall, Shokz, Sennheiser and more - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:19

It's been all go in the world of headphones and earbuds in the first six months of 2026. In fact, we've put live no fewer than 70 audio-product reviews in the first half of the year.

In the ever-evolving wireless headphones space, the predicted uptick in open-ear designs (a 400% surge in releases of the design was cited late last year) and also wired options (the digital detox trend continues apace) means I had a lot to pick from for this little roundup.

Because of this, I've chosen to up my usual '5 best' to '8 best' in the headphone space, and give you a 50/50 split of the best headphones and earbuds we've tested so far this calendar year. You'll also see there's a wired option in this main list, as well as a couple of open-fit earbuds. We are nothing if not trend-setters here at TechRadar HQ.

I'll kick off with earbuds and move onto headphones — and within each grouping, I'll organize by release date, so starting with the January release of the ground-breaking Shokz OpenFit Pro, moving on to the February-issue Huawei Freebuds Pro 5 and so on.

Because even eight spots isn't enough to cover all bases, I'll also add a few honorable mentions at the end of this roundup. As I said, it's already been a bumper year for headphones — and we're still only half-way through it…

The 4 best earbuds of 2026, as tested by TechRadar1. Shokz Openfit Pro
  • Release date: January 6, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

Finally, a set of open earbuds that sound like you're not wearing open earbuds! In the end, I didn't review the Shokz Openfit Pro because I had to have shoulder surgery — although I did do an early hands-on in which I said how impressed I was with these excellent buds. The writer who did review them is a very active man and, as you'll see if you click through, he put them through their paces for a whole range of sporting activities.

And this is honestly the Openfit Pro's greatest strength. Fans of sports-specific open earbuds and bone-conduction solutions will likely be well versed in Shokz products, but the OpenFit Pro are the first ever Shokz earbuds to feature a "synchronized dual-diaphragm driver and noise reduction". And by 'noise reduction', you absolutely must think 'active noise cancellation, but for an open-ear design'.

And I think (apart from perhaps last year's Honor Earbuds Open, which aren't especially geared for sports use) it's the first time ANC in an open design has been done really well.

Shokz would point you towards its unique new "aerospace-grade aluminum PMI dome cap" on the driver housing as one of the biggest design features. What it means is that there's a little 'nub' on the earpiece now, and it is a very good thing from a design perspective as well as sonically. It slips happily under the cimba concha (one of the inner folds of the outer ear — you'd get it if you tried them) to make them secure for a range of sports. And did I mention the sound? Oh, it's aces.

Read our in-depth Shokz Openfit Pro review

2. Sennheiser CX 80U
  • Release date: Janauary 27, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

Isn't it refreshing to see something priced at $39.95 / £34.99 (about AU$55) making a 'best of 2026' roundup? And from a trusted name such as Sennheiser too?

For that nominal fee — as my colleague Harry said in his thorough review — "these wired buds offer responsive, clean bass that grabs your attention without spoiling the party for sounds in the mid and treble ranges."

They're not winning any design originality awards, but the CX 80U do feel very pleasant in the ear, even for multi-hour listening sessions (some of us struggle with sleep sometimes OK?) and none of the team ever experienced discomfort or irritation. You also get small, medium and large ear tips included in the box, helping you to find your perfect fit.

There’s also an in-line controller, which is neither too close to the face nor too far down, and because it's attached to the right bud, you'll always know which side is which in a hurry.

All in all, a bargain proposition if you're embracing the wired trend this year — and if you are on that particular train, you should know it leads on past this to Audiophile Town. On this journey, I support you!

Read our in-depth Sennheiser CX 80U review

3. Huawei Freebuds Pro 5
  • Release date: February 26, 2026
  • Rating: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

I see a lot of earbuds with AirPods Pro looks (although it has to be said, not as many as perhaps two years ago) all vying for a slice of the AirPods' healthy sales figures. So, for me to agree that a set of earbuds classes as a "serious AirPods Pro rival" is no small statement. And the Huawei Freebuds Pro 5 are those earbuds.

For everyday listening, the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 are the best earbuds you can get without spending significantly more. They score highly across the board, and make a compelling case that there’s life beyond Apple's ice-white offering — even for those who have been reluctant to shop around.

This is, as the name suggests, the fifth generation of Huawei’s FreeBuds Pro line, which has been knocking on the door patiently since 2020, waiting for people to notice them — and to be fair, we’ve always rated them rather well. The FreeBuds Pro 4 landed in November 2024 and scored four stars, i.e., strong, but not quite there. What you need to know is that the Pro 5 are a wholly different beast; good enough to go head-to-head with the best at this level, including the September 2025-issue Apple AirPods Pro 3.

The FreeBuds Pro 5 look and feel more premium than their price suggests. They’re smaller and lighter than the Pro 4 at 5.5g per bud, which is noticeable. Build quality is excellent, the stems have a high-shine finish and the case has a satiny coating that feels upscale. And the sound and feature-set? It's incredibly good sound-per-pound value at this level. Highly recommended.

Read our in-depth Huawei Freebuds Pro 5 review

4. Anker Soundcore Liberty 5 Pro
  • Release date: May 21, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

Well well well… another fifth-generation set of earbuds finally breaking through the congested roster of 2026 releases to make this Best in Show list!

Anker's Soundcore sub-brand doesn't necessarily have a reputation for releasing the absolute best earbuds; we gave the Soundcore Liberty 5 (yes, take care, because those aren't these — neither is this the 5 Pro Max, which you should swerve in favor of this product, the 5 Pro) a 3.5-star score, and that tended to be par for the course. Until now.

The May-issue Soundcore Liberty 5 Pro brought a change to the brand: it really feels like the firm is coming into its own as a sound specialist, and it knows what buyers really want.

The fit here is fantastic, and while you might think we've been swayed by the fancy touchscreen case, actually no. It's fine, but what is fantastic is the companion app you get with your purchase: it'll boggle your mind given how many tools it offers. And all of the perks are useful too — the ANC is very good, the listening test is handy, and the array of array of little extras is truly impressive for the money.

Read our in-depth Anker Soundcore Liberty 5 Pro review

The 4 best headphones of 2026, as tested by TechRadar 1. Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000
  • Release date: October 31, 2025 (but we got them to test in March '26)
  • Rating: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

You wanted the best, and these are the best. Nobody said 'best' meant 'affordable' though, so here we are. The eagle-eyed may note that these wired over-ears launched in late 2025, but owing to the very few review samples circulating (see my first point about this being an elite set of headphones), we only got our mitts on them in early 2026; and hang it all, it's my list and I need you to know about them.

If the price tag doesn't make you recoil, you've got a decent amp to drive them and you accept that they're an open-back design (so you wouldn't want to wear them on a packed commuter train or a long-haul flight in coach, say — although I'd wager owners of these cans will fly Business at least), the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones are an exceptional audio investment.

Think beautifully precise and engaging audio, plus exhilarating low-end performance — and they're very comfortable too. Okay, yes, for $3,499 / £3,000 / AU$4,999 you might expect comfort, but it isn't always a given, even at this level. Give them the right source material and amplification, and these exceptional headphones will reward you no end.

Read our in-depth Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review

2. Nothing Headphone (a)
  • Release date: March 13, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

Now this is how you do a follow-up set of cans. Regular readers might remember the rather extravagantly priced Nothing Headphone (1) which, well, got 3.5 stars shortly after their release owing to a congested, slightly disorganized and compressed sound. These are not those.

This March-release set — from Nothing's mid-range '(a)' series, although I know it's a confusing naming structure — sound better and do more, but weigh, and cost, less.

The clamping force is still relatively strong, but I personally love the design, including a round multi-function custom button on the top of the right ear cup that can trigger your voice assistant by default, summon EQ control, be a mic mute, or work as a camera remote trigger — a new feature for this model, and one much pricier models (including the AirPods Max 2) have also implemented.

I don't want to appear smug, but I did predict last year that while Nothing hadn't aced it with the Headphone (1), the company took three goes to nail decent earbuds, and I was sure the next set of cans released by the quirky firm would fix all the issues of the inaugural set. And here we are: the Nothing Headphone (a) are some of the best new cans at their level.

Read our in-depth Nothing Headphone (a) review

3. Apple AirPods Max 2
  • Release date: March 16, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

So, Nothing's cans sat at the top of the pile for precisely… three days. Yep. The ever-evolving world of wireless ANC headphones can be brutal, and only three days after Nothing's affordable and delightfully different-looking headphones started snatching up column inches, Apple's second-generation flagship headphones landed, looking every bit the same as the first pair. And they still came out on top. Harsh, but fair…

I haven't always been an Apple headphone cheerleader. So you might think, given the complete lack of design overhaul, I'd be a little disappointed in the newest AirPods Max 2. But put them on your head, deploy the ANC and get them playing music and it becomes impossible to dislike them. The new H2 chip in each ear cup, combined with a new amplification module, is truly game-changing.

Yes, you can use the Digital Crown as a remote and yes, you can now do gestural controls, use Live Translation, or speak to someone and the headphones now adjust playback so you can chat happily, but none of these upgrades is what clinches the deal for me. What does? The noise cancellation is 1.5 times better, and if you've ever heard the first set, you'll know how remarkable an uptick in performance that is. Also, the sound is punchier and crisper, with greater dynamic nuance and insight.

The one fly in the ointment (and the reason I couldn't give them the full five-star score) is the battery life, at only 20 hours. But I'll take a hit on stamina when the bubble-of-silence ANC is this good.

Read my in-depth Apple AirPods Max 2 review

4. Marshall Milton ANC
  • Release date: May 19, 2026
  • Rating: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)

A set of wireless on-ears in a 2026 'best of' roundup? How novel! And it's not just because of Marshall's continued commitment to rockstar, old guitar amp chic — although that customizable gold 'M button' on the corner of one ear cup is a beauty.

They're comfortable and you get a whopping 80 hours of playtime with ANC off, and a still-great 50 hours with noise cancelling active. But their magic is in what they combine: the Marshall Milton ANC effectively fuse everything we loved about the company's Major and Monitor models. They combine the iconic on-ear look of Marshall’s most popular headphones with the noise-cancelling capabilities and rich feature-set of their pricier over-ears, and all for an official price of $229 / £179 / AU$329.

And come on, they look much pricier than that! Marshall's Soundstage mode also makes a welcome return here, a profile intended to “make your sound more spacious”. It works nicely here, even in an on-ear design. OK, the effects aren’t as drastic as you'll get from some headphones’ spatial audio options, but you can adjust the metaphorical ‘room size’ and ‘amount’ that you'd like to get with your spatial sound. Top tip: a medium room at 80% was the sweet spot for my colleague Harry (and I happen to agree).

Read our in-depth Marshall Milton ANC review

Honorable mentions The best of the rest Future / Simon LucasFuture / James HollandCarrie Marshall / Future

We've tested swathes of headphones and earbuds since the outset of 2026, and I cannot list all of them here, although you can go to my friendly audio reviews corner of TechRadar for a full list of everything that's been through the full 12 rounds with us recently (and in chronological order).

The three products I'm shining a light on here are headphones that also gained 4.5-stars following our thorough review process (not everything gets this rating, believe me) but that didn't quite make the list.

First up is the wired Meze Audio Strada, which landed on January 21, 2026. These are closed-back headphones (great for listening with people around you) that manage to sound admirably un-closed, and deliver an awful lot that will appeal to the well-off and larger-headed listener. Ah, there's the rub! While I adore the soundstage (not to mention the Macassar hardwood ear cups and Magnesium frame), I do not own a particularly large noggin and I struggled to achieve a fit that didn't fall backwards to the nape of my neck. Still, a lovely listen for the larger-headed audiophile.

Next, cast your eye in the gallery above to the mid-March arrival of the JBL Live 780NC. I've got no issue with the fit here, and the sound is great for the money, as is the feature set and very generous 80-hour battery. It's a little disappointing that you don't get a charging cable in the box though, and if we're being truly nitpicky (and it is our job to do so) the bass here can be a little overpowering for the audiophiles among us. That said, if you love the Harman curve (and plenty of consumers do, it has been proven!) they'll likely suit you just fine.

Lastly in this little trio, I'd like to draw your attention to the Grado Signature S750. They are another wired offering, this time open-backed, that actually landed towards the end of 2025 but, owing to their $1,695 / £1,695 (about AU$3,400) price tag, we wanted to take plenty of time over. We published our review in early 2026 — and I still want you to know about them. Things we loved? The exceptionally wide soundstage with excellent positioning and pinpoint clarity. The only issue? Despite the claim of 50% more padding than earlier models, Grado's design language might best be described as brutalist. I love how they look, but they're still quite hefty and after longer listening sessions, you do start to feel that weight across your crown…

What are 2026's 5-star tech products for far? Here are the 25+ products that earned top marks in our tough hands-on testing - Friday, July 3, 2026 - 08:23

Can you believe it? We're at the midway point of 2026 already. That means one thing: it's time for our half-year 5-star reviews roundup. So far this year we've tested over 600 gadgets, games and appliances across all of our channels. That's way too many to put into a single roundup, so for this mini retrospective I've focused only on physical products, and only the five-star awardees.

These are the gadgets that soared through our rigorous tests, and shone in crowded markets. They're the products we just couldn't find fault with. There are speakers that wowed us with their "crystal clear, fathoms deep" sound, a "perfect" Android tablet that rivals the best Apple can offer, a soundbar that raises the — er — bar for soundbars in 2026, and a mini fan that blew the competition away.

Without further ado, let's begin our showcase of the best products we've tested so far in 2026. Click the More details button for more info and each one, and a link to the full review.

Headphones & speakers

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones

Read the full review

Pros
  • Beautifully detailed
  • Exceptional low end
  • Lightweight and comfortable
Cons
  • Very expensive
  • Very high impedance

Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i speakers

Read our full review

Pros
  • Poised, direct and expressive sound
  • Great low-frequency speed and control
  • Built and finished to high standard
Cons
  • Less expressive at lower volumes
  • Too big to really be ‘bookshelf’ speakers
JBL Go 5 Bluetooth speaker

Read the full review

Pros
  • Great sound for its size
  • Attractive edge lighting
  • Highly waterproof and durable
Cons
  • Can be beaten for battery life
  • Limited bass due to compact form
  • Can't change color of the lights
JBL Xtreme 5 Bluetooth speaker

Read our full review

Pros
  • Amazing audio with exceptional bass output
  • Impressive clarity and detail, especially using USB-C
  • Phenomenally sturdy and waterproof
  • Great value in spite of fairly high price
Cons
  • Bulkier than its predecessor
  • No mic for hands-free calls
  • Battery life isn’t class-leading

Dali Sonik 1 speakers

Read the full review

Pros
  • Phenomenal, clear articulation of sound
  • Outsized bassy weight
  • Great price for sound stability
Cons
  • Slight treble over-presence
  • Sometimes-overzealous bass reflex
  • No bi-wiring capabilities
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 earbuds

Read our full review

Pros
  • Excellent ANC
  • Great-looking, comfortable design
  • Packed with features
Cons
  • Lossless only for Huawei phones
  • Slightly chunkier than rivals
  • No foam eartips

Cambridge L/R S stereo speakers

Read our full review

Pros
  • Expansive, organized and vigorous sound
  • Great standard of build and finish, numerous colorways
  • Interesting and extensive specification
Cons
  • Overconfident low-frequency response
  • Loses some composure at the biggest volumes
  • Must overcome some outstanding opposition
Mobile & computing

Honor MagicPad 4 tablet

Read the full review

Pros
  • Incredibly thin and very lightweight
  • Beautiful, high refresh rate OLED screen
  • Unbelievable value
  • Excellent speakers
  • Almost unbeatable update support
  • Great new PC mode
Cons
  • Slight battery downgrade compared to the MagicPad 3
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Read our full review

Pros
  • Winning design
  • Powerful
  • Busting with AI
  • Still excellent cameras
  • Privacy display
  • No price hike
  • S Pen included
Cons
  • An iterative update
  • No more titanium
  • Still no MagSafe-style wireless charging
  • Not every AI works as promised or expected
Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike Wireless Gaming Mouse

Read our full review

Pros
  • Great build quality
  • Ultra-low click and sensor latency
  • HITS switches are pure brilliance
  • Comfortable, ergonomic shape that suits all grip types
Cons
  • No left-handed version
  • Not cheap (but honestly, worth it)

Gigabyte MO32U24 gaming monitor

Read our full review

Pros
  • Sublime HDR Performance
  • Brilliant colors and contrast
  • A semi-gloss coating that does an impressive job of reducing reflections
  • A multitude of image-tinkering options to suit persnickety workers and gamers
Cons
  • Not cheap
  • Not a flashy, ostentatious, RGB-laden gaming monitor

Asus RT-BE92U router

Read our full review

D-Link Aquila Pro AI R95

Read our full review

Pros
  • Competitive price
  • Excellent Wi-Fi performance
  • 2.5Gb Ethernet ports
  • Well-designed app
Cons
  • Limited parental controls
  • Design is a little gimmicky
Home tech KitchenAid Semi Automatic Espresso Machine With Burr Grinder

Read our full review

Pros
  • Controls are easy to master
  • Grinder is quiet in use
  • Flat-bottom porta filter is a stroke of design genius
  • Excellent espresso shots and frothed milk
  • Very good looking
Cons
  • Expensive for its feature set

LG G6 OLED TV

Read the full review

Pros
  • Outstanding picture quality
  • Massively better at beating reflections
  • Phenomenal gaming performance and features
  • Well laid-out webOS smart TV platform
Cons
  • Still a pricey set to buy
  • No HDR10+ or promise of Dolby Vision 2
  • UK remote still feels cheap
Samsung HW-Q990H Dolby Atmos soundbar

Read the full review

Pros
  • Powerful, engaging and detailed sound profile
  • Good connectivity options
  • Easy to set up and use
Cons
  • Premium price
  • Design needs an update
  • LED display still tricky to read
Philips OLED910 TV

Read our full review

Pros
  • Superb high-end OLED picture quality
  • Detailed, accurate sound
  • Sublime Ambilight feature
Cons
  • Only two full HDMI 2.1 ports
  • Motion requires some tweaking
Apple AirTag 2

Read our full review

Pros
  • Find My range is way better
  • Much louder chime
  • Design unchanged to fit all your existing AirTag accessories
  • Apple Watch support
  • Same security and privacy features
  • Price unchanged
Cons
  • Why only in white?
Philips Baristina coffee machine

Read our full review

Pros
  • Simple to use, even for beginners
  • Much easier to clean than most bean-to-cup coffee makers
  • Smart, sleek design
  • Very reasonably priced
Cons
  • Grind size can't be adjusted
  • No steam wand (although there's an optional standalone milk frother)

Ultion Nuki Smart Lock 2025

Read the full review

Pros
  • Strong mechanical security credentials
  • Built-in Wi-Fi (no hub required)
  • Matter support for smart home compatibility
  • Fast, quiet motor
  • Multiple access methods
  • Straightforward installation
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Internal unit still protrudes
  • Charging lead isn’t universal

Dyson HushJet Mini Cool Fan

Read our full review

Pros
  • Powerful concentrated air flow
  • Runs for up to 6.5 hours on a single charge
  • Stylish, unusual design
  • Significantly cheaper than closest competitor
Cons
  • Air intake holes are easy to cover with your hand when holding
Philips Cafe Aromis 8000 Series Bean to Cup Coffee Machine

Read our full review

Pros
  • Gorgeous design
  • All components feel solidly made
  • Consistent brewing results
  • Prepares hot and cold drinks
  • Detailed customization options
  • Excellent mobile app experience
Cons
  • Ground coffee hatch has a tendency to steam up
  • Needs to cool down completely before preparing cold drinks
Cameras and accessories Sigma 135mm f/1.4 DG Art

Read our full review

Pros
  • Stellar image quality
  • Wide f/1.4 aperture
  • Arca-swiss tripod food
  • Fast focusing
Cons
  • Large and heavy build
  • Expensive
  • Limited mount options
  • No optical stabilization
DJI Avata 360 drone

Read our full review

Pros
  • Great 10-bit image quality from dual sensor setup
  • Choice of control methods
  • Agile, speedy and safe flyer
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Other DJI drones beat it on image quality
  • Buying both FPV and standard controllers could push up the price
  • No manual FPV flight option

DJI Lito X1 drone

Read our full review

Pros
  • Great video quality for the price, especially with Lito X1
  • Omnidirectional obstacle avoidance included
  • Better battery life than the Neo 2 and Flip
Cons
  • Camera doesn't rotate for 9:16 content
  • Soft digital zoom
  • No built-in storage on Lito 1 model
Sony FE 100mm f/2.8 Macro GM OSS

Read our full review

Pros
  • Image quality
  • Build quality
  • Optical image stabilization
  • 1.4x magnification
  • Compatible with teleconverters
Cons
  • Expensive
  • A little bigger than other 100mm macro lenses
  • No tripod foot collar

Sony A7R VI mirrorless camera

Read the full review

Pros
  • Class-leading resolution
  • Speedy sensor and burst shooting
  • Neat and rugged design with helpful touches
  • Sticky subject-detection autofocus
Cons
  • New battery type, meaning Sony's older battery isn't compatible
  • If you don't need the improved speed, the A7R V is a better-value choice
  • Still no open-gate video recording
  • Still uses pricey CFXepress Type A cards for optimum performance
Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Read our full review

Pros
  • New 33MP sensor
  • 7K open gate video
  • Useful and intuitive autofocus features
  • Refined shooting experience
Cons
  • Restricted recording times on some formats
  • Slightly worse dynamic range than rivals
  • Canon's R-Mount is still closed
  • More expensive than Mark II

Nikon Z 70-200mm F/2.8 VR S II

Read the full review

Pros
  • Light for this type of lens
  • New optical design improves image quality, including bokeh
  • Tripod collar is fully removable
  • Rugged build quality
  • Works with teleconverters
Cons
  • Pricey
  • Still large
  • No display, nor focus distance markings
Gaming accessories

Sony Inzone H6 Air

Read the full review

Pros
  • Incredibly lightweight and comfortable
  • High-end sound backed up by studio-grade drivers
  • Sleek, premium design
  • Great materials
Cons
  • Middling software features
Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2

Read our full review

Pros
  • Stylish lenticular design
  • Durable and well-built
  • More game card slots than pricier rivals
Cons
  • Slightly susceptible to fingerprints
  • Not big enough to house your dock
  • A little bulkier than Nintendo's official case
Razer BlackShark V3 gaming headset

Read our full review

Pros
  • Incredibly easy to set up straight out of the box
  • Lightweight design ensures comfort for longer sessions
  • 70 hour battery life means no charging frustrations
  • Crystal clear audio to immerse you in all sorts of games
Cons
  • Cable is a bit unwieldy for the Bluetooth dongle
  • No on-ear or in-ear storage for microphone when disconnected
Turtle Beach Stealth Pro II wireless headset

Read the full review

Pros
  • Exceptional audio performance
  • Highly stylish aesthetics do not disappoint
  • Class-leading battery life
  • A staggering wireless range
  • Swarm 2 software is top-notch
  • An almost XLR quality mic
Cons
  • Clamping force takes a while to adjust to
Audio gadgets FiiO KA15 DAC dongle

Read our full review

Pros
  • Entertaining design
  • Superb sound quality
  • High power output
Cons
  • A little fiddly
  • No iPhone app

DJI Mic Mini 2

Read the full review

Pros
  • Small, lightweight and customizable transmitters
  • Affordable price
  • Versatile connectivity and mounting options
  • Reliable performance
Cons
  • Apple Lightning adapter not included
  • No monitoring display on receiver
  • Few reasons to upgrade from original Mic Mini

Insta360 Mic Pro wireless microphone system

Read the full review

Pros
  • Best-in-class noise cancelling in testing
  • Pro-level features
  • E-ink display sets it apart from rivals
  • Cold-shoe shotgun mic mounting option
Cons
  • Windshields won't fit in charging case
  • Insta360 camera integration still feels incomplete
  • No Lightning adapter in the box

iFi Go Link 2 DAC

Read the full review

Pros
  • Superbly portable
  • Superb sound
  • Plug and play operation
Cons
  • Relatively low power output
  • No balanced output
  • Cable feels fragile

Eversolo DAC-Z10

Read our full review

Pros
  • Sound quality impresses, especially detail retrieval
  • ‘Thorough’ doesn’t begin to cover specification
  • Three nicely realized control options
Cons
  • Needs to matched with high-end gear
  • Control app is extensive but dull

Pages