News
- AI growth keeps enterprise hard drive demand climbing across global cloud infrastructure
- Cloud providers continue expanding storage despite massive investment in AI accelerators
- Enterprise storage remains essential as artificial intelligence generates unprecedented data volumes
Enterprise demand for high-capacity hard drives continues accelerating as artificial intelligence generates expanding datasets requiring reliable, affordable storage throughout increasingly complex cloud environments.
That growing appetite for storage has intensified competition among cloud providers building artificial intelligence infrastructure, keeping enterprise hard drives firmly within long-term investment plans.
Seagate's recent fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year 2026 financial results indicate continued demand from cloud data center customers despite no disclosure of future HDD allocation commitments.
Enterprise customers continue driving demand for mass-capacity HDDsAI relies heavily on enormous storage capacity because valuable data must remain available long after computations are done.
As organisations deploy larger AI models, the amount of stored information grows alongside computing requirements.
This significantly increases the dependence on enterprise hard drives for economical long-term retention.
Unfortunately, HDDs are becoming harder to secure, with manufacturers already booking long-term supply commitments years in advance.
Many HDD manufacturers have locked in contracts extending into 2028 and 2029, meaning customers wanting drives that far out may already be shut out of available slots
Seagate said robust cloud data center demand kept driving business growth, tying stronger storage purchases to AI infrastructure expanding across global markets.
"As AI accelerates data generation and its value, we see durable long-term demand for mass capacity storage," said Dave Mosley, Seagate's chair and chief executive officer.
Seagate expects strengthening exabyte demand through its Mozaic platform and differentiated HAMR technology roadmap as enterprise deployments continue expanding worldwide.
While Mosley did not explicitly say customers are reserving Seagate's hard drive production through 2029, his remarks make clear that enterprise demand now sits at the core of the company's strategy.
Financial performance supports the broader storage storySeagate's latest financial results provide additional evidence supporting enterprise storage demand.
Its annual revenue increased during fiscal 2026, while Q4 performance exceeded company expectations for revenue.
Operating cash flow reached $3.7 billion during fiscal 2026, while free cash flow totalled $3.1 billion after fourth-quarter operating cash flow reached $1.3 billion.
Seagate also reduced total debt by $1.4 billion during fiscal 2026, including $302 million during the fourth quarter, ending with outstanding debt of $3.6 billion.
Cash and cash equivalents reached $1.7 billion, while ordinary shares outstanding totalled 227 million and directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share.
Seagate expects first quarter fiscal 2027 revenue near $4.1 billion alongside non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of approximately $7.30, subject to stated variations.
"Seagate's strong fourth quarter exceeded our expectations for revenue and non-GAAP EPS, capping a fiscal 2026 in which we grew,” Mosley said.
“Our performance is being driven by robust cloud data center demand and disciplined execution, and we see the momentum continuing in 2027."
Seagate’s rival, Micron, already made the move that Seagate is currently hinting at. It exited its Crucial consumer RAM businesslin 2025 to redirect supply toward enterprise customers.
Micron said the shift was meant to "improve supply and support for our larger, strategic customers in faster-growing segments," cutting consumer buyers off from a manufacturer they had relied on for years.
Seagate has not gone that far with hard drives, but Mosley's insistence that cloud demand is driving the business suggests it could prioritise enterprise demand if current trends continue.
Via TechPowerUp
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is smaller, cheaper, and has fewer cameras than the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, but it may end up being the most popular Galaxy foldable to date.
Why? Because its 7.6-inch inner screen has a 4:3 aspect ratio, which is supposedly “the new standard for viewing content,” as Samsung told us in an interview — and if there’s one thing most of us can’t get enough of in 2026, it’s content.
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, meanwhile, has an eight-inch inner screen with a 10:9 aspect ratio, which is great for spreadsheets and multitasking, but less brilliant for movies and YouTube videos.
Don’t believe me (or Samsung)? I compared the experience of streaming Netflix, watching YouTube, and scrolling through Instagram Reels on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra — in both portrait and landscape orientations, where possible — to help you visualize the aspect ratio differences between these two devices.
Check out the side-by-side comparisons for each platform below, and let me know in the comments section which phone you’d prefer to use for watching videos. I've also included a roundup of each model's respective size specs for added context.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Dimensions (unfolded):
158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1mm
161.4 x 123.9 x 4.5mm
Dimensions (folded):
158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9mm
81.9 x 123.9 x 9.7mm
Display (unfolded):
8 inches, 10:9
7.6 inches, 4:3
Display (folded):
6.5 inches, 21:9
5.5 inches. 16:10
NetflixZ Fold 8 (10:16) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:21)(Image credit: Future / Netflix / Studio Ghibli)Z Fold 8 (4:3) vs Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future / Netflix / Studio Ghibli)Z Fold 8 (4:3) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (10:9)(Image credit: Future / Netflix / Studio Ghibli)Z Fold 8 (3:4) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future / Netflix / Studio Ghibli)YouTubeZ Fold 8 (16:10) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (21:9)With either phone in this orientation, expanding the YouTube video automatically switches the orientation to landscape (see the next photo) (Image credit: Future / Warner Bros. Pictures)Z Fold 8 (4:3) vs Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future / Warner Bros. Pictures)Z Fold 8 (10:16) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:21)(Image credit: Future / Warner Bros. Pictures)Z Fold 8 (4:3) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (10:9)(Image credit: Future / Warner Bros. Pictures)Z Fold 8 (3:4) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future / Warner Bros. Pictures)Instagram ReelsZ Fold 8 (16:10) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (21:9)(Image credit: Future)Z Fold 8 (4:3) vs Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future)Z Fold 8 (4:3) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (10:9)(Image credit: Future)Z Fold 8 (3:4) / Z Fold 8 Ultra (9:10)(Image credit: Future)VerdictFor Netflix and YouTube, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 provides a cleaner viewing experience than the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra in every orientation except 3:4.
The actual size of the video in every comparison is the same across both phones, but black bars (or negative space) above and below are noticeably narrower than those on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, and there's no awkward pillarboxing (i.e., bars on either side of the video) when using the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in 10:16.
Of course, if you use the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in 3:4, the black bars are much bigger than those on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, but I don't expect anybody to choose this orientation for watching video content (I've only included it for additional context). Samsung itself admits that 3:4 is “more natural for reading e-books or browsing the web,” which gives the smaller device another nice win over the pricier model.
The Instagram Reels-watching experience is pretty similar across both phones, but given the Galaxy Z Fold 8's lighter weight (201g vs 215g), I'd give it the edge here, too.
So there you have it: if watching videos and scrolling through social media is your priority, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a better buy than the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra.
Of course, there is much more to both phones than their respective displays — the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra has better cameras, for instance — so I wouldn't jump headfirst into buying one over the other until you've read our full Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 comparison.
Side note: You're not able to watch videos in 16:10 (Z Fold 8) or 21:9 (Z Fold 8 Ultra) on Netflix, nor videos in 10:16 (Z Fold 8) or 9:21 (Z Fold 8 Ultra) on Instagram, hence why these options don't appear in the above comparison.


