News

Robot lawn mowers are growing in popularity, and with good reason. They're getting more advanced in features, easier to set up and use, and can be a huge time- and effort-saver... provided you pick the right model. There are plenty of options to choose from, spanning a range of prices and capabilities, and if you're new to the lawnbot world then it can be tricky to figure out which one you need.

This article is here to guide you through that process. I've pulled together five big questions to help you narrow down your options. And for added expertise, I've enlisted the help of KK Yin, Marketing Director at leading lawnbot brand Mammotion, whose insights you'll find throughout the piece.

"Everyone has a different environment for their lawn. So the first thing a customer should do is choose which kind of power system they need — for example, all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive, or some the brands have front-wheel drive," says KK.

Rear-wheel drive will be perfectly fine if you have a relatively even and flat lawn, and will have no issue scaling relatively gentle inclines. However, if you have a very steep or uneven lawn, all-wheel drive (AWD) will help ensure the lawnbot maintains its grip without churning up your grass. Front-wheel drive is really only for flat lawns, and is a less common power system.

AWD tends to be reserved for larger, more premium robot mowers. However, at the start of this year Segway Navimow launched compact AWD model, with the suggestion that it would treat your turf more gently.

Next, KK suggests figuring out which navigation method is best suited to the environment. "A customer should look at if they have shaded areas, the house is tall or they have trees in the garden. If they do, I suggest they don't choose an RTK positioning system. They should maybe choose a LiDAR model," says KK.

There are two major navigation systems for robot mowers. RTK, which uses satellites, can work very well if the lawnbot has a wide, uninterrupted view of the sky. However, if there are obstructions — such as those listed by KK — in the way, these can block the signal and lead to the lawnbot getting lost.

LiDAR is the system used by robot vacuums, and is relatively new in the robot mower market. LiDAR builds a picture of its surroundings by bouncing light off objects, so it's not well suited to wide-open lawns with no objects in them.

Broadly speaking, RTK will be a good choice in big, open yards, whereas LiDAR might be a better fit if you have a smaller, more cluttered yard. LiDAR models are often pricier, so if you can get away with an RTK bot, you might prefer to go with that option.

Many lawnbot models are available in a few different iterations aimed at different-sized lawns (typically indicated by a number after the product name). The difference is usually the battery capacity — a bot designed for a larger area will have a bigger battery, enabling it to cover more ground before having to return to its dock to recharge, thus making it more efficient.

"I think most users figure out that in one week they will mow maybe two or three times. So they need to work out how long it will take a product to mow their lawn once," suggests KK. With that information, you can work out if your mower will be efficient enough to keep up with your grass-trimming demands.

"The next point, I think, is about multi-zone management," says KK. "Not all people have one big lawn — it's divided by the house, or the garden is split into different areas. That means they need to manage more than one mowing zone."

Pretty much every lawnbot will be able to mow multiple separate lawns, with the ability to create different maps in your app. However, some have more advanced multi-zone capabilities than others. One bot might be intelligent enough to handle a schedule where the lawnbot spends the morning in Zone A and moves to Zone B in the evening, and it might even be able to work out the optimal mowing patterns and cadence.

If you end up with a satellite-based lawnbot (see point #2), you might need to decide between a bot that comes with a separate antenna and one that does not. This RTK station is required to make the satellite information more accurate — so satellite positioning on its own might tell you where a bot is to within a meter or two, but add in a separate RTK receiver and it's more like centimeters.

Traditionally, you'd have this receiver in your own back yard. This adds an extra level of complexity to setup — the reciever needs to sit high up, with direct line of sight to satellites in the sky, and it also needs a power source. However, increasingly, we're seeing lawnbots that use a big, centralized RTK receiver that covers a large area. Mammotion calls this NetRTK. It's definitely a more low-effort option.

There are further features to look out for if you want the most straightforward setup. Some modern robot mowers have cameras and AI features that enable them to instantly create a map of their location, so you can just pop it on the floor and it'll be able to start mowing pretty much instantly. KK suggests these kinds of features are more of a nice-to-have, and advises focusing on the first four points first.

We've tested plenty of excellent lawnbots at TechRadar. Here's a taster of some of our favorites — tap the 'View details' button for more information, plus a link to our full reviews.

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

Read our full review

• Someone has made a custom version of the Companion Cube case for the Steam Machine
• This DIY effort is on Printables, and can be 3D-printed for those with the hardware and necessary skills
• There are a growing number of custom projects around the Steam Machine, from faceplates through to full-on alternative takes on the gaming PC

Remember the ill-fated Companion Cube case for the Steam Machine? It had the plug pulled on it by Valve a few weeks ago, after maker Dbrand failed to get official permission to make its hard-shell case for the gaming PC, but now the concept has returned, in DIY form.

Tom's Hardware reports that a user on Printables, Jaron, has provided files that allow you to 3D-print your own version of the Dbrand Companion Cube (as flagged on X). You can print the pieces, and a full set of assembly instructions (including smart video illustrations) and extra necessary parts (screws and so forth) are supplied.

As made clear on X, this is a fan-made creation implemented "from scratch" and it's based on images of Dbrand's Companion Cube. Whether it'll attract the attention of Dbrand's own lawyers, well, we'll just have to see, but you'd imagine that some leeway might be granted here given the situation and what happened with Valve.

The creator makes it clear that the case isn't an official product, is nothing to do with Valve, and that it doesn't use "any official assets from any game".

An additional caveat is that Jaron notes: "I have not done any extensive thermal tests but no airflow or venting is blocked, and the additional vent provided by the front face plate aperture logo can help provide a little extra airflow. So I don't believe there will be any cooling issues caused by this case."

My main concerns about the original Dbrand Companion Cube were bound up in cooling issues — especially on warm days, in confined spaces like a TV cabinet — and that remains true with this creation.

Still, if you were disappointed that Dbrand's case was cancelled, and you have a 3D printer and want to have a crack at making your own — and you're pretty decent with a soldering iron — you can now do just that.

Since the Steam Machine came out, there's inevitably been a lot of interest around the device, despite the high price. So, as well as this clone of the abandoned Companion Cube case, what else is out there in terms of Steam Machine customization?

New faceplates (front panels) are popular, and a much easier project than the above case, such as this example on Reddit (see the image above). I really like the slat effort here, and I can see why it's gone down very well with other Redditors (although I'm not so keen on the blue one).

What's also quite common is the number of custom small form-factor (SFF) PCs which are DIY takes on the Steam Machine, generally featuring beefier components (and at the same time, inevitably being larger than Valve's PC). 'The Orange Box' as shared on Reddit is a particularly smart example of one such effort with a strong Valve theme, built in a SilverStone SG05BB-Lite case. It has a Ryzen 7 5800X processor inside and an RX 9060 XT graphics card to give this considerably more pep than Valve's gaming PC.

There are other custom SFF PCs on Printables and this one from 3DCatt, which looks like a sized-up Steam Machine, has very similar aesthetics to fit your living room nicely, and a finished version someone has completed went very well indeed by all accounts.

Of course, there are issues around these alternatives to the Steam Machine as I explored in detail recently, and downsides to these custom SFF builds – albeit definite positives too, better performance being the main one. A PC that looks as good as The Orange Box doesn't hurt, either, and I'm sure we'll see more of these kind of SFF spins on the Steam Machine going forward.

Amazon has cut the prices of the Geekom AX8 Max to $619 (was $699) and the flagship Geekom A9 Max is down to $1440 (was $1599) mini PCs, giving you the choice between an affordable all-round performer and a premium AI-focused workstation.

Having tested the two machines, whether you're upgrading a home office, replacing a bulky desktop, or looking for a compact creative machine, both mini PCs offer plenty of performance in a surprisingly small package.

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, Radeon 780M graphics, 16GB DDR5 memory, 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Windows 11 Pro, dual USB4 (40Gbps), dual 2.5GbE LAN, SD card slot, support for up to four 8K displays.View Deal

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M graphics, 32GB DDR5 memory, 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD, Windows 11 Pro, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, dual USB4, HDMI 2.1, dual 2.5GbE LAN, support for up to four displays, up to 86 TOPS AI performance.View Deal

✅ Choose the AX8 Max if...

You want the best balance between performance and price. The Ryzen 7 8745HS processor, Radeon 780M graphics, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 1TB SSD provide more than enough power for productivity, photo editing, media creation, multitasking, home servers, and light gaming. Dual 2.5GbE networking, USB4 connectivity, quiet operation, and support for four displays should satisfy most buyers while costing considerably less.

In his review, Alastair summed it up saying: "All-metal build, AI-ready, and support for an 8K monitor make this a powerful office-ready option."

✅ Choose the A9 Max if...

You want as much performance as possible from a compact desktop. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 processor, Radeon 890M graphics, 32GB of DDR5 memory, 2TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, and dedicated AI hardware make it a stronger choice for AI workloads, software development, video production, 3D rendering, virtualization, and heavy multitasking. It delivers substantially more computing power for professional work.

Alastair's review for this model declared it: "A feature-packed AI-ready mini PC with surprising performance in a compact, ultra-stylish form."

These two mini PCs target different very different buyers. The cheaper AX8 Max combines AMD's Ryzen 7 8745HS processor with Radeon 780M graphics, fast DDR5 memory, dual USB4 ports, dual 2.5GbE networking, and support for up to four displays.

Its IceBlast 2.0 cooling system is designed for quiet operation, making it well suited to offices, home workspaces, or always-on NAS duties where low noise is important.

The A9 Max is more for buyers with deeper pockets who need considerably more horsepower. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 processor brings dedicated AI acceleration alongside Radeon 890M graphics, while 32GB of DDR5 memory and a 2TB SSD provide plenty of room for demanding applications.

Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, dual USB4 ports, HDMI 2.1, and dual 2.5GbE networking complete a specification that's built for professional content creation, AI applications, large datasets, and intensive multitasking. If you'll actually use that additional performance, this is the model to go for.

The AX8 Max's current $619 price is reasonable. It was $499 in October 2025, and went up to $999 in April 2026. Similarly, the A9 Max at $1,439.10 is more expensive than the $999 it was in August 2025, but much cheaper than the $,1799 Amazon was selling it for in May 2026. Looking at the range of prices, the message here is clear: Whichever model you go for, buying at the right time can save you hundreds of dollars.

The biggest question isn't which mini PC discount is better, but whether you genuinely need the extra performance.

The cheaper AX8 Max already offers enough power for the vast majority of workloads, making it the smarter buy for many people.

The pricier A9 Max only becomes worthwhile if you'll benefit from its faster processor, larger memory and storage, stronger graphics, and dedicated AI capabilities.

• Shop all mini PCs at Amazon

• Senior director and video game industry advisor at Circana, Mat Piscatella, reports only seven PlayStation games have sold more than 100,000 physical units year-to-date in the US
• He says two games "sold more than 10,000 physical units in the US during the week ending July 11, 2026"
• This comes as fans push Sony to reverse its plan to end the production of physical discs

In light of Sony's decision to retire the production of physical game discs, an industry analyst has reported that physical PlayStation games aren't selling too well in the United States.

Last week, angry PlayStation fans descended on the comment section of the latest Marvel's Wolverine trailer, another effort to push Sony to backtrack on its plan to end the production of physical discs starting January 2028.

As of writing, the video has over 12,600 comments, with the vast majority from fans sharing their thoughts on the decision.

Now, in response to a news story about the situation, Circana senior director and video game industry advisor Mat Piscatella has shared some interesting stats about the state of physical game sales in the US.

Writing on Bluesky, Piscatella said, "Two PlayStation video games sold more than 10,000 physical units in the US during the week ending July 11, 2026.

"Seven have sold more than 100,000 physical units year-to-date." He also clarified later that the figures didn't refer just to first-party PlayStation games, but "total PlayStation. All games, all publishers, all PlayStation platforms."

Addressing the fan backlash, the analyst added, "Commenting is cool, use your voice and all that. But commenting is cheap, [I don't know] idk."

Which games those are is unclear, but global estimates shared earlier this month by Alinea Analytics (via GamesRadar) suggest EA Sports FC 26, Resident Evil Requiem, and 007 First Light could be among those seven. It's estimated for Requiem specifically that 27.8% of its 3.5 million copies sold came from physical discs.

Sony has been notably quiet in the face of the backlash, and according to multiple analysts, despite the fan backlash, the PlayStation maker won't reverse its decision because "digital is just too lucrative."

"They of course knew what the online reaction would look like, and they now wait for this storm to pass," said Dr. Serkan Toto, CEO of Japanese game industry consultancy firm Kantan Games.

"Sony has over 120 million active PlayStation users. Around 50 million people subscribe to PlayStation Plus. As a thought experiment, let's say 500,000 cancel in protest, that would be just 1% of that business gone — of course not enough to Sony to start rethinking. Digital is just too lucrative.

He added, "Their current profit margin has been too weak for years now, so they feel like they must act," Toto added. "From an economic perspective, digital sales just make too much sense especially for platform holders."

If you’ve always loved the world of the Splatoon series but have been — understandably — put off by the prospect of its sweaty competitive multiplayer modes, then this latest Nintendo Switch 2 exclusive third-person shooter is for you.

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: July 23, 2026

Splatoon Raiders offers an incredibly compelling, single-player take on the series’ trademark ink-spewing action. It’s all underpinned by the same excellent shooting mechanics that make online matches of Splatoon 3 such a blast, now smartly recontextualized in a wholly player versus environment (PvE) format and enhanced with a plethora of satisfying progression systems that allow you to experiment with countless impactful character builds.

The sheer volume of content here is formidable: there are a vast number of highly replayable missions that can be tackled in multiple difficulty levels, more than a hundred weapons to wield, and even lend others a hand in online co-op for more unlockable rewards. This is comfortably one of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games and I know I’ll be coming back to it, even now I’ve seen the credits roll.

While the main Splatoon games are known for their clean urban aesthetics, Splatoon Raiders sets itself apart with a much grimier, more salvaged look. Set on the distant Spirhalite Islands, it follows an unnamed mechanic working for the Deep Cut trio — the iconic TV show hosts from Splatoon 3 who apparently moonlight as treasure hunters. With the group stranded on a raft after their latest treasure hunting expedition goes awry, they’re forced to improvise gear and track down the resources necessary to escape.

Fashioned from wooden crates and metal grates, the raft functions as your hub world in between missions and can be outfitted with a range of useful features like a customizable firing range and a range of upgrade stations, in addition to more whimsical options like an arcade cabinet that offers some cute pixel-art minigames. You always feel like there’s a meaningful upgrade that you’re working towards, and watching your craft develop from a ramshackle structure into a fully-fledged mobile base as you progress through the story is immensely satisfying.

That’s not to say that you need much encouragement to complete missions, however, as they’re a load of fun. There are three main types: quickfire dens that have you beating a few waves of foes in a short time limit, longer raids where you drop into large semi-open environments to secure nearby treasure chests, and dungeons that challenge you to get to a goal with a set loadout.

I love the character creator in Splatoon Raiders. It lets you choose between an Inkling or Octoling protagonist, with customizable facial features and a range of cute hairstyles that are perfect for expressing yourself in co-op. The generous selection of unlockable outfits is lovely too.

It seems pretty basic at first, but there are an incredible number of unique twists that keep each new mission feeling fresh. A den, for example, might throw hundreds of the same area-denial enemies at you — coating the small arena with noxious slime that chips away at your health and forces you to stay on your feet — while a raid could surprise you with tricky platforming sections and a strict time limit.

The dungeons, meanwhile, are more focused around puzzles and cleverly serve to tutorialize many of the weapons and abilities that you can unlock.

Your character can carry one of three ink tanks (which basically determine your chosen ‘class’), designed for raw power, speed, or more careful ranged tactics. They all play completely differently, with their own roster of powerful gadgets to unlock and an overall power level that gradually ticks up with use.

I mainly relied on the Power Tank, which, true to its name, is all about big, bombastic attacks that deal massive damage. My favorite gadgets include the inky hatchet with its huge slashing strike that is invaluable for taking out tankier foes and a charging rocket launcher that wonderfully shreds through groups of smaller ones.

It might be tempting to rely on one favorite, but there are plenty of good reasons to try the others. Fully upgrading one tank requires you to spend time with the others, and some dungeons even have specific rewards depending on which you use to complete them. I initially thought that this might prove a frustrating barrier to progression, but soon came to appreciate being made to step out of my comfort zone because all three tanks are equally enjoyable to use with a huge variety of gadgets to discover.

Every gadget is highly customizable as well, with a plethora of collectible parts that do everything from minor stat upgrades to fundamentally change how they work. You can only add a certain number of parts at a time, so you’ll need to think carefully in order to craft a new build to successfully overcome a particularly tricky challenge.

There’s just as much depth to the wide selection of weapons. The 11 types on offer will all be familiar if you’ve played Splatoon 3, with a good mix of long-range shooters, nimble pistols, sloshing buckets, and so on, all with their own mechanics to master. Tackling more difficult missions rewards more powerful weapons at a strong pace, which, alongside the steady introduction of new rarities with their own unique qualities, further stops everything from becoming stale.

The same is true of the many enemy types. It’s the same malevolent Salmonids from the Salmon Run side modes of Splatoon 2 and 3, but with a healthy number of new varieties to surprise even the most seasoned fish hunters.

It all comes together for an experience that, even when some of the more difficult challenges force you to grind up your power level, remains fresh and exciting like a delicious piece of sashimi throughout.

You’ve always wanted a single-player Splatoon
Splatoon Raiders finally delivers the single-player Splatoon experience that many have been waiting for, giving you a new way to discover the franchise without the pressure of PvP.

You want something to play for the long haul
With its wealth of meaty progression systems, Splatoon Raiders gives you loads of goals to work towards. Pick this up if you want a game that you can dip into over and over again.

You’re after a meaty co-op experience
Although primarily a single-player experience, Splatoon Raiders supports online co-op that lets you tackle the majority of its missions with up to three friends.

You’re not interested in Splatoon
Splatoon Raiders is a superb game, but it’s not going to win you over if you already disliked the series’ third-person, ink-based combat.

Like most modern Nintendo releases, Splatoon Raiders is lacking when it comes to accessibility features. It offers the ability to invert both thumbsticks, or use motion controls to aim.

The color of ink is usually random, but you can lock it to either blue or purple in order to be easier to see. In addition to offering harder versions of most missions, the game features three overall difficulty modes which decreases or increases the power of enemies.

I played nearly 20 hours of Splatoon Raiders on Nintendo Switch 2 using the Joy-Con 2 controllers in handheld mode. For audio, I used the system’s built-in speaker setup.

I experienced the whole of the game’s story, hitting the credits having tackled all of the major missions on the standard difficulty mode, in addition to some online co-op play.

First reviewed June 2026

There's a pattern many organizations know well. A new technology arrives, adoption accelerates faster than governance can keep up, and a few years later, the finance team is staring at a spreadsheet, wondering how the bill got so large and who signed off on it.

The SaaS era exposed what happens when technology adoption outpaces financial oversight. And with agentic AI embedding itself into everyday workflows, organizations risk heading down a similar path.

Recent reporting on Amazon employees 'tokenmaxxing' - gaming internal AI metrics to inflate adoption figures, is an early signal of what that looks like in practice.

But the dynamic is not specific to Amazon. When AI usage isn't fully visible, and the incentives favor showing more activity rather than less, accountability tends to disappear quietly. It points towards a governance failure - and governance failures require structural solutions.

The opportunity is clear. The governance isn't.

AWS's Banking on the Cloud 2026 report makes the strategic case for agentic AI in financial services clearly and compellingly. Cloud computing infrastructure and AI agents are positioned as the foundation of next-generation banking, which means faster decisions and more responsive customer experiences.

What the report focuses on is what AI can save. The other part of the equation is what AI itself costs to run at scale, and who's accountable for that.

The cost model for AI agents behaves differently from anything most enterprise finance teams have managed before. When you license a conventional software tool, there's usually a fixed price and a user count. The spending is visible even when it isn't well-controlled.

AI agents work differently as they run continuously, calling on external services and triggering actions across systems as they go. Each step consumes resources, and because agents operate autonomously, often handling tasks that would previously have required human judgment, that consumption can scale quickly and unpredictably. There's no contract line that captures it cleanly and no renewal date that forces a review.

Getting ahead of this requires visibility that most organizations are only now beginning to build.

The SaaS management challenge is a familiar one to most IT and finance leaders. Application estates grew faster than procurement could track them, governance lagged behind adoption, and many enterprises spent years rationalizing software stacks they never intended to build. It’s an ongoing problem that businesses are still managing, years down the line.

AI agent sprawl will likely develop differently, but the underlying problem is similar. The critical difference is pace.

A SaaS tool that gets deployed and forgotten sits there, quietly billing at a fixed rate. An AI agent generating outputs in real time is actively consuming resources from the moment it runs, and that financial exposure, left unmonitored, compounds in ways a forgotten software subscription simply doesn't.

Organizations that get the right comprehensive visibility in place early will be in a significantly stronger position than those treating cost governance as something to formalize later.

There's also a regulatory dimension that's coming into sharper focus, particularly in financial services. AI agents frequently depend on external model providers and third-party data sources. Each dependency introduces a potential point of failure - and in regulated industries, potential compliance exposure.

Regulators are paying attention, the EU AI Act's full obligations for financial services AI land in August 2026, and DORA audits are already underway, which means the question of who owns that chain of accountability will need a cleaner answer than most organizations currently have.

The encouraging part is that none of this requires building new disciplines from scratch. It requires applying familiar ones to a new context and doing it early.

The right starting point is understanding cost in relation to outcome. What does it actually cost to complete a task using an AI agent, and what is that task worth to the business? Answering it means connecting AI spending data to the broader picture of how technology is used and what it delivers, so that finance and engineering are working from the same information rather than talking past each other.

Controls also need to be built into the infrastructure rather than layered on top of it. As agent deployments grow, no team can realistically review individual workflows by hand. Policies that depend on someone remembering to check a dashboard aren't really policies; they're suggestions. When a budget review turns difficult or a regulator asks questions, suggestions don't hold up.

Most importantly, ownership needs to be established from day one. Which budget carries this deployment? Who reviews it when consumption shifts? Right now, many AI agents are being deployed by engineering teams without meaningful involvement from finance. That gap is entirely closable. Closing it before the bill arrives, rather than after, is where the real advantage gets built.

The organizations that navigate agentic AI well will be the ones that treat governance as part of the deployment decision rather than an afterthought to it. Cleaner accountability means faster decisions and AI investments that can actually be defended against the board or a regulator. Throughout the rest of this year and beyond, that is the key differentiator between organizations that scale AI confidently and those that are still untangling the bill.

We've reviewed, rated, and ranked the best personal finance software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit