News
Picture the scene. The head of IT security at a major business has just managed their team through several weeks of grueling work in containment and recovery after the latest ransomware attack. Their critical systems are back online, but after constant crunch time and sleepless nights, the team is visibly fraying; morale is low, anxiety is high, and there is more than one empty desk where senior personnel have taken extended sick leave.
This kind of scenario rarely gets attention in the press, where the focus of cyberattacks is on profit and loss, the impact on customers and the bottom line. But serious attacks take their toll on security teams too, and the aftermath can persist for months, leaving the organization even more vulnerable to future threats.
True cyber resilience, then, cannot be measured solely by systems restored or data decrypted - it must also factor in the people whose well-being determines not just how swiftly an organization recovers but whether it can withstand the next digital onslaught.
The hidden internal impact of an attackThe impact of an attack is typically weighed by system downtime, lost business, and potential reputational, legal and regulatory damage. Successful cyber strategies are measured in terms of key metrics like mean time to detect and respond to incidents.
But when the smoke clears and systems are back online, the human cost to personnel dealing with the attack is rarely tallied in stakeholder reports.
A landmark RUSI and University of Kent study found that cybersecurity personnel frequently experience PTSD-like symptoms, from panic attacks to insomnia, long after a crisis has been resolved.
This results in a second wave of disruption as sick leave and diminished morale ripples through the department and goes on to impact the rest of the company. Burnt-out IT and security teams will struggle to keep up the company’s baseline security, further increasing its risk exposure.
One major financial services firm in the University of Kent’s study reflected that placing its exhausted engineers on gardening leave immediately after a ransomware crisis could have averted “months and months” of subsequent sickness absence and spared the organization the hidden costs of burnout.
In short, serious attacks like ransomware don’t just hold data hostage; they also trap people in a cycle of exhaustion and fear. If organizations treat staff wellbeing as an afterthought rather than a key element in the front-line defense, they risk allowing human capital to become the weakest link in their cyber-resilience strategy.
The growing cyber leadership crisisWhile the personnel on the frontline of incident response and containment are suffering from stress and overwork, things are often even worse higher up the chain. CISOs and other senior security leaders are usually held ultimately accountable for any failure to prevent or contain a breach, and it’s a responsibility that weighs heavily.
Leaders may be held personally responsible for crises they may lack the budget, headcount or organizational clout to address. Adding to the strain, success in this field frequently remains invisible: a CISO and their team may stop hundreds of daily attack attempts without fanfare, yet a single breach can spell career-ending catastrophe.
Putting in extra hours to stay on top of this workload is standard practice and our research found that 98% of security leaders admit to routinely logging an extra nine hours a week on top of contracted time as they attempt to keep ahead, with 15% pushing beyond sixteen hours overtime.
Soberingly, over half of the respondents said they are actively exploring new roles. This would be a troubling statistic for any industry, but it’s especially damaging in the cybersecurity field grappling with a long-term skills drought. When an IT security leader leaves, they take years of hard-won experience and knowledge with them, leaving the company’s security on less stable footing.
Organizations must protect their security talentIf the individuals responsible for your defenses are exhausted, no firewall can effectively prevent the relentless tide of burnout. Enterprises must integrate human resilience into their incident-response framework, a process that commences well before an alert is triggered.
However, it need not be a resource-heavy exercise for the organization. For example, our research found that 65% of organizations already offer flexible hours and 62% enable hybrid or remote working as standard. Simple measures like this grant staff a sense of control and space to recharge.
On a larger scale, enterprises need to ensure they have a framework in place to protect security personnel, especially leadership roles where the heaviest burden falls. CISOs need to feel empowered on a strategic level with the tools and influence to properly protect the company, not left struggling to make do.
When an incident does occur, the aftermath and recovery phase should focus on forward-looking conversations about what happened and what can be improved for next time. This support is even more important as we see a growing trend towards personal accountability and legal liability when procedures for reporting are not followed.
Removing the stigma of security stressAlongside specific security processes, there’s a strong psychological element here too. The high-stress nature of cybersecurity should be openly acknowledged and accommodated, not treated as a burden that CISOs should conceal. Conversations around mental health should be normalized, and companies should consider wellbeing checks to spot early warning signs of burn out.
Communication is a key part of this. During an incident, the security team should feel connected to the company they are protecting, not in isolation, and should have a reporting process for feeding back on challenges and concerns if they need additional support.
When an attack has been resolved, a team wellbeing check should be a standard part of the post-incident process. Not every team member will have the same resilience in the face of a stressful crisis, and not every incident will hit the same. Businesses must be aware of who is struggling and provide support to them as needed.
Resilience beyond recoveryRansomware may be a security issue, but its true impact plays out in human terms: sleepless nights, frayed nerves, and the talent exodus that follows unaddressed burnout.
By incorporating people-first measures into your cyber-resilience strategy, you can ensure that your organization won’t be weakened from within after a breach. The true test of resilience shouldn’t be solely about restoring systems quickly; it should also assess how effectively you protect and preserve the individuals who defend them.
We list the best firewall for small business.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
From the war in Ukraine, to the Middle East, and escalating tensions in the South China Sea, the threat of conflict is forcing governments and businesses to confront an uncomfortable truth that digital systems are not immune to geopolitical pressure.
At London Tech Week recently UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the way that war is being fought “has changed profoundly,” adding that technology and AI are now “hard wired” into national defense. It was a stark reminder that IT infrastructure management must now be viewed through a security lens and that businesses need to re-evaluate data management technologies and practices to ensure they are not left out in the cold.
Easier said than done. According to recent research from Civo, 83% of UK IT leaders say geopolitics threatens their ability to control data and 61% view sovereignty as a strategic priority, yet only 35% know exactly where their data resides. That’s not just a compliance gap. It’s a sign that infrastructure, policy and strategy are still out of sync.
Data sovereignty used to be a conversation for the policy teams and legal departments. Not anymore. Regulatory fragmentation, rising cyber risk, and increasingly complex data ecosystems are forcing organizations to treat sovereignty as a live operational concern. Whether it’s knowing who can access your AI training data or ensuring a healthcare provider meets national residency requirements, data sovereignty now defines what businesses can and cannot do.
The EU Data Act, the UK's evolving position (the UK is no longer bound by the EU Data Act but it remains closely aligned in practice to preserve data adequacy and ensure the continued free flow of data with the EU), and the increasing stringency of critical infrastructure policies, are starting to shape what enterprise resilience should look like.
As Lord Ricketts noted in the House of Lords in October last year, “the safe and effective exchange of data underpins our trade and economic links with the EU and co-operation between our law-enforcement bodies.” That trust depends on demonstrating a clear and enforceable approach to data control.
For many, public cloud services have created a false sense of flexibility. Moving fast is not the same as moving safely. Data localization, jurisdictional control, and security policy alignment are now critical to long-term strategy, not barriers to short-term scale. So where does that leave enterprise IT? Essentially, it leaves us with a choice - design for agility with control, or face disruption when the rules change.
Modern infrastructure needs to be sovereignty-awareSovereignty-aware infrastructure isn’t about isolation. It’s about knowing where your data is, who can access it, how it moves, and what policies govern it at each stage. That means visibility, auditability, and the ability to adjust without rebuilding every time a new compliance rule appears.
A hybrid multicloud approach gives organizations the flexibility while keeping data governance central. It’s not about locking into one cloud provider or building everything on-prem. It’s about policy-driven control across environments, managing workloads through the context of data.
For example, a financial services firm may need to keep customer transaction data within UK borders, but still wants to run analytics in the cloud. With the right architecture, workloads can move, but sensitive data stays governed. That’s sovereignty in practice, not theory.
Of course, generative AI introduces a new layer of complexity. Training models on private data, deploying inference at the edge, or simply sharing prompts between locations adds pressure to already stretched governance models.
And while many organizations have rushed to build or adopt AI tools, few have aligned these efforts with data residency or compliance. Sovereignty isn’t just about storage anymore. It’s about compute, access patterns, and understanding how third-party models interact with your data.
Building with sovereignty in mindEdge and sovereign cloud capabilities will be essential here. But they only work if infrastructure teams are given the mandate and support to build with sovereignty in mind. That means cross-functional collaboration between legal, compliance, and IT. It also means choosing platforms that support location-aware deployment and policy enforcement from day one.
According to Nutanix’s recent public sector sovereignty research, 94% of public sector organizations are already using GenAI tools, yet 92% say they could do more to secure those workloads, and 81% say their infrastructure needs improvement to support sovereignty requirements. That says everything you need to know about the challenges facing both public and private organizations. Complexity has clouded judgement and capability.
And yes, customers want to know where their data is, of course they do. Partners also want to understand how it’s being used. With regulators increasingly expecting transparency, not just tick-box compliance, sovereignty, in this context, becomes a proxy for trust.
This is particularly important in sectors like healthcare, education, and government. But it’s not limited to them. Any business operating in or across regulated markets needs to demonstrate control. Not because it’s a checkbox, but because it’s now fundamental to continuity and reputation.
So where do you go from here?First, get clear on where your data is and what laws apply. That’s not always simple. Next, review your infrastructure to see if it can support location-aware controls, hybrid deployment, and detailed auditing.
Then, consider where GenAI and future workloads are headed. Are you prepared to scale them without breaching sovereignty requirements? Can your teams adapt quickly as policies change?
Finally, treat sovereignty not as a constraint, but as a core part of your design strategy. The organizations that do this well won’t just be compliant, they’ll be more resilient, more transparent, and better prepared for what comes next.
Because in a world where data moves faster than policy, the ability to stay in control isn’t just good governance, it’s good business. And when geopolitics forces the issue, it might just be the nudge needed to get sovereignty right.
We list the best data migration tools to help manage your files.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
- Three in five firms would pick UK over Europe, APAC and US for tech investments, Barclays report finds
- Tech companies saw cash flows and savings rise, overdrafts reduce
- Further government support is needed for long-term support
New research from Barclays has claimed tech firms are increasingly seeing the UK as an attractive place to invest, with 62% of tech leaders favoring the UK over Europe and nearly as many favoring the UK over APAC (61%) and the US (60%).
A strong customer base, skilled workers with a diverse talent pool and fast consumer adoption of tech were cited as key influencers behind the UK’s potential success.
Three in four also noted the UK’s economic climate supports growth (76%) and that its political landscape will help over the next three years (75%).
Tech firms are investing in the UKHalf of the 500 UK-based technology leaders surveyed said they now plan to increase AI investments by 20% over the next 12 months with almost all of them (95%) reporting increasing client demand for AI products and services.
Thanks to the healthy landscape in the UK, 70% of the tech firms surveyed plan to increase capex by an average of 8.9% this year.
Separate Barclays data found that tech business cash flows rose by 1.7% between Q1 2024 and Q1 2025, and the tech sector had the higher increase in savings account balances, up 21.5%. Overdraft usage also fell 26.2% despite borrowing remaining relatively flat, suggesting increased financial health.
“There’s a clear sense that the UK is holding its own on the global tech stage, with founders and leaders increasingly seeing the UK as one of the best places in the world to grow and scale,” Head of Technology, Media & Telecoms & Innovation Banking Helena Sans commented.
Looking ahead, 72% agree that government backing is essential to long-term growth. This includes specialized funding programs (44%), support to attract international investors (37%), enhanced tax incentives for equity investments (36%) and startup and SME grants (36%).
You might also like- We’ve listed the best AI tools and best AI writers
- The best online collaboration tools can help make you more efficient
- UK firms are investing heavily in new tech - but will it make any difference?
If Zero Trust actually worked like the industry said it would, VPNs would’ve disappeared years ago. Instead, they’re booming. We’ve all heard the warnings, seen the vendor pitches, and read enough LinkedIn posts to fill several lifetimes: Zero trust is supposed to be here.
And yet, despite all that hype, the business VPN market isn’t just alive — it's thriving, projected to nearly double from $5.7 billion in 2024 to well over $10 billion by 2033.
The Comfort of the FamiliarI wrote my first VPN — Tunnel Vision — back in 1998, for the first customer of my first startup. Later we replaced it with an IPsec key manager. Then I wrote sshuttle, a sort of VPN built on top of SSH. At Google, I ended up writing a multicast VPN tool we called "frobnicast" (don’t ask). And finally, I co-founded yet another VPN company to try fixing this once and for all. That makes it five VPNs so far. As the meme goes, we have become exceedingly efficient at it.
Why do we keep writing new VPNs? Because the old ones suck. But honestly, it's not just VPNs that suck — it’s TCP/IP that sucks. If IPv4 had been encrypted by default and access-controlled from the beginning and didn't run out of IP addresses and IPv6 had successfully rolled out, we wouldn’t need VPNs. Every generation of these tools has been a workaround for something broken further down the stack.
Still, businesses don’t let go of familiar tools easily. I once wrote that “not changing stuff is amazingly powerful as a product strategy.” VPNs are dependable. Or at least, they’re the devil we know. They’re built into enterprise security bundles, they’re in the onboarding checklist, and they’ve been “good enough” for long enough that most teams have figured out how to live with them.
But when a tool sticks around long after its design goals are obsolete — like my old dialer program WvDial, still popular decades after modems became irrelevant — it’s worth asking why. In WvDial’s case, the answer was simple: everything else was worse. That story still applies to VPNs.
When Security Gets in the WayAccording to recent research, this comfort comes at a cost. Over 83% of engineers admit to bypassing their company's security controls simply to get work done. Worse yet, 68% retain access to internal systems after leaving their employers, exposing critical gaps in the security lifecycle. Yet, despite these clear risks, only 10% of professionals feel their current VPN "works well."
So, VPNs linger not because they're ideal, but because migrating fully to zero trust isn’t trivial. It’s not a product you can buy; it’s a shift in how you think. Continuous verification, least privilege access, and identity-first networking sound simple until you try to retrofit them into a sprawling, 20-year-old IT architecture.
The VPN MisconceptionThere’s a common belief that VPNs are fundamentally insecure. They’re not. But the traditional enterprise VPN model, the one that drops you inside the perimeter and lets you wander freely, is dangerous. That’s like giving everyone a master key to your office building.
A better model grants access one step at a time, based on who you are, what you need right now, and where you’re coming from. Microsegmentation. It’s not about banning tunnels — it’s about more, smaller tunnels, each with its own control valve.
Where Zero Trust Really BeginsThe most secure approach is one where identity management is everything. Not where you are, not what subnet you’re on, not whether you’re in the office. Identity. Strong authentication, hardware-backed keys, just-in-time access.
But identity isn’t easy. Our survey found only 29% of organizations have adopted identity-based access control at scale. Even fewer use automation. Many still rely on spreadsheets and service account credentials that outlive the employees who set them up.
So security becomes a tax. It slows people down. And when security gets in the way, people route around it. That’s why VPN fatigue is real — and growing.
Yet, there's hope. Nearly half of surveyed companies are consolidating fragmented tools, embracing automation, and experimenting with adaptive policies. But more interestingly, they're starting to rethink their whole approach.
Security and engineering teams are collaborating instead of clashing. They're designing systems that work with people, not against them. AI tools are emerging — not to replace humans, but to help notice the things humans miss: a sudden pattern change, a weird login time, an unexpected access request.
More companies are adopting modular, policy-driven systems. Instead of writing 50 firewall rules, they define intent: "this kind of app talks to that kind, under these conditions." That’s not Zero Trust as a checklist — it’s Zero Trust as infrastructure.
A Pragmatic Path ForwardZero trust isn’t a product you install. It’s a direction you walk in.
Start by reducing implicit trust — wherever you find it. Use strong identity through encryption, not IP addresses. Make credentials short-lived. Assume the worst. Break your network into zones. Shrink the blast radius.
But do it gradually. Nobody rips out all their networking in a day. Choose one high-value system and zero-trustify it. Learn. Repeat.
VPNs will stick around a while, not because they’re good, but because everything else is hard or immature. But as we’ve seen with tools like WvDial, still in use long after its time, familiarity isn’t the same as fitness. The future belongs to systems that embrace the complexity of real-world access — and make it feel simple.
I don't want to write VPNs, I don't want to deploy VPNs, I just want to solve real problems. But we can't solve the real problems without a working network. So here I am with a $1.5B company still selling VPNs. Sure it's maybe the best VPN. But it looks like I'll be continuing to do it for years, so that other people can finally solve real problems.
And if we finally get it right this time, maybe we can stop reinventing the same broken tunnel — one VPN at a time.
We've listed the best VPN deals.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
- Samsung has announced an event on September 4
- We'll likely see the Galaxy Tab S11 series and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Other leaks have given us a clear idea of what to expect from the Galaxy Tab S11 series
It’s a busy time for smartphone launches, because not only has the Google Pixel 10 series just launched, with the iPhone 17 series likely to land in a matter of weeks, but Samsung has also now announced a new launch event.
This will take place on September 4 at 5:30am ET / 2:30am PT / 10:30am BST / 7:30pm AEST, and it will be streamed live on Samsung’s YouTube channel.
So what can you expect? Well, Samsung hasn’t named any specific devices in its event invite, but it has said that we’ll see “premium AI tablets” and “the newest member of the Galaxy S25 family”, which almost certainly means the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 series and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE respectively.
Specs and images are already out in the wildThanks to leaks and rumors we also have a good idea of what to expect from these devices, and in fact there are some new leaks about the Galaxy Tab S11 series.
First up, leaker @MysteryLupin has shared a full specs list for the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11. This mentions an 11-inch 1,600 x 2,560 display with a 120Hz refresh rate, an included S Pen stylus, a MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus chipset, 12GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, a microSD card slot, an IP68 rating, and an 8,400mAh battery with 45W charging.
The list also mentions a 13MP rear camera, a 12MP front-facing one, four stereo speakers, a thickness of just 5.5mm, and a weight of 484g.
So the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 sounds like an accomplished slate going by this specs list, and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra should be even better. For that, Android Headlines has shared some renders and videos, providing a good sense of what it might look like.
(Image credit: Android Headlines)You can see the slate in gray and silver colors, and it’s shown with slim bezels and a small notch, with a dual-lens camera on the back. An S Pen stylus and a keyboard accessory are also pictured.
Some of these images also include specs, mentioning a 14.6-inch display, which based on previous leaks will probably have an 1,848 x 2,960 resolution. We’ve also heard in previous leaks that the Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra could have a MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus chipset, 16GB of RAM, a 12MP main camera, a 13MP ultra-wide one, and an 11,600mAh battery with 45W charging.
As for the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, there’s no new information on that, but previous S25 FE leaks point to a 6.7-inch 120Hz screen, an Exynos 2400 chipset, 8GB of RAM, and 128GB or 256GB of storage.
They also mention 50MP, 12MP, and 8MP cameras on the back, a 12MP one on the front, a battery of either 4,500mAh or 4,900mAh, and 45W charging.
You might also like- The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra could have major changes to its cameras and design, but one key spec might be lacking
- The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra could have a privacy-boosting AI trick built into its screen – here’s how it works
- Two key specs leak for the Galaxy S26 – and we may get a battery upgrade at last
- The European Commission rejects accusations that the Digital Services Act (DSA) is designed to harm US big tech
- The EU also denies that DSA content-removal requirements constitute internet censorship
- This comes as Trump threatens sanctions against EU member states implementing DSA rules
No, the EU's Digital Service Act (DSA) doesn't constitute internet censorship and isn't designed to harm US big tech giants specifically.
This is the blunt reply from the European Commission on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, in response to accusations made by US President Donald Trump the day before – Reuters reported.
On Monday, in fact, another report from Reuters revealed that the Trump administration was considering imposing sanctions against the European Union and any member states looking to implement DSA rules.
The EU's Digital Service Act seeks to create a safer online environment, said the EU, by limiting the spread of illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material, and disinformation on digital platforms. It also bans manipulative advertising practices.
Washington sees these actions as restrictions on Americans' freedom of speech, with a government spokesperson confirming to Reuters that authorities are monitoring the situation in Europe "with great concern."
DSA enforcement decisions have so far affected X and Meta, but also Chinese-owned companies like AliExpress, Temu, and TikTok, said an EU spokesperson.
Beyond the EU (Image credit: Shutterstock / Koshiro K)US officials' concerns around new digital regulations aren't limited to the EU, though, nor to the Digital Service Act.
In a Truth Social post, Trump shared his intentions to "impose substantial additional tariffs" on all countries that target American tech companies with digital taxes or regulations, "unless these discriminatory actions are removed."
This comes only days after a pledge from the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to at least 13 US tech giants, including Apple, Alphabet (parent firm behind Google), Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon, to resist UK and EU demands to weaken encryption and censor content.
Besides the EU DSA, the FTC raised the alarm about two UK laws in particular – the Online Safety Act and Investigatory Powers Act.
US officials have been critical about the latter, following a Technical Capability Notice (TCN) issued under the law that hit Apple in February and led the tech giant to remove its advanced end-to-end encryption protection from iCloud in the UK market. The UK, however, has now agreed to drop its Apple encryption backdoor request, in a victory for Washington.
At the end of July, mandatory age verification in the UK was also enforced as per the Online Safety Act, age-gating not just adult-only content, but also so-called legal but harmful material across multiple platforms like social media, dating apps, and even music streaming services, like Spotify.
Millions of Brits have so far turned to the best VPN apps to bypass age checks, mostly for fear of the privacy and security consequences of sharing their most sensitive data with third parties.
You might also likeEyes up here... if only to spot the tearaway who was once booted off Married at First Sight for brawling with one of the other grooms. Let's hope there's no such grappling in Dating Naked UK, as that really would be unbecoming.
You can watch Dating Naked UK season 2 online from anywhere with a VPN and potentially for free.
Premiere: Friday, August 29 (UK, CA)
Stream: Paramount Plus
Use NordVPN to watch any stream
Poor Luke Worley from Clacton is probably never going to live his MAFS UK season 8 ejection down, so he might as well try to learn from it. Plus, nobody applies to be on Dating Naked because their love life's going to plan.
Take Keir, who's drawn to bad boys against her better judgement and has paid the price over and over. Or Matt, who after a year of celibacy is just about fit to burst. A penny for the thoughts of Jordan's mum. The semi-pro footballer says he applied for the show because his mum's been on his back to settle down since 30 appeared on the horizon.
While nudity is well within Connor's comfort zone, it's the prospect of a serious relationship that sends chills running down his bare spine. And we have a philosopher in Nina, who cancels out her wild nights out with green juices and wellness retreats.
Read on as we explain how to watch Dating Naked UK season 2 from anywhere.
Unblock any stream with a VPNIf you're keen to watch Dating Naked UK season 2 but you're away from home and access to the show is geo-blocked, then you could always use a VPN to access it (assuming you're not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised by how simple it is to do.
Use one of the best VPNs to watch Dating Naked UK from anywhere:
Editors ChoiceNordVPN – try the world's best VPN risk-free
We regularly review all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice. It unblocked every streaming service in testing and it's very straightforward to use. Speed, security and 24/7 support available if you need – it's got it all.
The best value plan is the two-year deal which sets the price at $3 per month, and includes an extra 3 months absolutely FREE. There's also an all-important 30-day no-quibble refund if you decide it's not for you.
– So, try NordVPN 100% risk-free for 30 daysVIEW DEAL ON
How to watch Dating Naked UK season 2 in the UKDating Naked UK season 2 premieres with a double-header on Friday, August 29 on Paramount Plus. A pair of new episodes will hit the streamer each week.
A subscription costs £4.99 per month, but if you've never signed up before you'll get a 7-day free trial.
Not in the UK? Anyone from the UK who wants to watch their usual streaming service from abroad can do so by using a VPN.
How to watch Dating Naked UK season 2 in CanadaDating Naked UK season 2 is exclusive to Paramount Plus in Canada, with a pair of episodes set to land every Friday, starting August 29.
A subscription costs CA$6.99 per month after a 7-day free trial.
Outside Canada when it airs? Simply use a VPN to watch from abroad.
Can you watch Dating Naked UK season 2 in the US?Paramount Plus is home to Dating Naked UK in the US, but at the time of writing there's no word on when season 2 will arrive. A subscription starts at $7.99 per month after a 7-day free trial.
In the meantime, a VPN will help you tune in if you're an Brit or a Canadian traveling in the US. NordVPN is our recommended provider, and you can find out why with our in-depth NordVPN review.
Can you watch Dating Naked UK season 2 in Australia?The first season of Dating Naked UK is available to stream on Paramount Plus in Australia, but plans for season 2 are under wraps at the time of publication. Prices start from $AU6.99 per month after a 7-day free trial.
Brits and Canadaians currently away from home can use a VPN to watch Dating Naked UK season 2 from abroad.
Dating Naked UK season 2 trailerDating Naked UK season 2 cast- Amara, 28
- Connor, 27, factory worker
- Mani, 22
- Jarrakeh, 28, creative artist
- Jordan, 31, semi-pro footballer
- Keir, 25
- Kelsey, 26, car detailer
- Luke, 32, business owner
- Matt, 32
- Nina, 29, party host
Dating Naked UK isn't free-to-air, but viewers in the UK and Canada can make use of the Paramount Plus 7-day free trial to tune in without charge.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
- Many AI pilots fail real-world operations and 95% of GenAI pilots don’t reach production, Salesforce claims
- CRMArena-Pro lets enterprises stress-test their AI agents with digital twins
- Two new benchmarks are used for stress-testing AI agents
Salesforce says enterprises are struggling with their AI pilots failing in real-world operations, and has launched CRMArena-Pro, a new service to allow businesses to create a digital twin of their operations to stress-test AI agents before they get deployed.
The company cited recent MIT research which found 95% of generative AI pilots don’t even reach the production stage.
CRMArena-Pro evaluates AI agents on real tasks, like customer service, sales forecasting and supply chain disruptions, but using synthetic data that’s been validated by experts.
Salesforce lets you stress-test AI agents using digital twins“CRMArena-Pro creates a rigorous, context-rich simulated enterprise environment framework with synthetic data, where it can safely evaluate API calls to relevant systems, as well as the ability to safeguard PII data,” the company wrote in an announcement.
By adding real-world noise into the test environment, CRMArena-Pro can better evaluate performance, strengthen resilience and bridge the gap between pre- and post-deployment.
“The result is AI agents that are capable, consistent, trustworthy, and agentic enterprise-ready.”
Companies can also see how AI agents handle real-world challenges like messy data, legacy systems and complex workflows.
Salesforce noted part of the complexity comes from the vast array of models available to choose today, and knowing which specific model or combination of models to use isn’t so simple.
To that tune, the company has published two new benchmarks to measure agent performance: MCP-Eval for evaluation through synthetic tasks and MCP-Universe, which adds real-world tasks and execution-based evaluators to stress-test agents in complex scenarios.
In a previous post, Salesforce noted that CRMArena-Pro “lays the groundwork for the next frontier: Enterprise General Intelligence” - and for now, users can expect “safe, capable and impactful” AI for all organizations.
You might also like- We’ve listed the best AI tools and best AI writers
- Salesforce unveils Agentforce 3, its smartest agent platform yet
- Give your workers a helpful boost with the best productivity tools
- Nintendo Switch 2's second month on sale has been hugely successful
- The console is currently outselling its predecessor by around 75%
- Overall gaming hardware spending reached $384 million as a result
It seems that appetite for the Nintendo Switch 2 isn't going away any time soon, as it's significantly outpacing its predecessor in sales in its second month on store shelves, at least in the US.
That's according to Circana senior director and game industry analyst Mat Piscatella who, shared some Switch 2 sales stats in a recent Bluesky post.
"The Nintendo Switch 2's second month on the market was another explosive one, at least in the US," Piscatella wrote, "where it surpassed 2 million units sold life-to-date, putting it 75% ahead of the unit sales pace set by the Nintendo Switch 1."
According to Piscatella, hardware spending reached $384 million thanks to the Nintendo Switch 2's strong sales performance. That's the highest since July 2008, where consoles on sale at that time included the Nintendo Wii, Nintendo DS, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and PlayStation Portable.
Additionally, Switch 2 exclusive Donkey Kong Bananza entered US July sales charts at #3, only behind the EA Sports MVP Bundle and EA Sports College Football 26, both of which would be expected among the mainstream US gaming audience.
Nintendo Switch 2's second month performance doesn't come as much of a surprise, as the system was already off to an impressively strong start in its launch month of June 2025. At the time, Piscatella told IGN that the Switch 2 had "the biggest launch month sales for any new video game hardware platform," and that Nintendo had largely made enough supply to meet the high demand.
You might also like...- Black Ops 7 carry forward is no more as devs axe old skins and promise a return to a more 'grounded' Call of Duty
- Early Asus ROG Xbox Ally X benchmark suggests excellent power efficiency and cooling – but I'm still not sold on the handheld
- Square Enix has revealed Final Fantasy 14 Fan Festival 2026 dates, and we'll hopefully learn more about the game's next expansion at the event
South Park season 27 episode 4 hasn't aired again this week, and it's now the third in a series of ongoing delays. After its controversial premiere, both episodes 2 and 3 have had two-week gaps between them, with episode 4 now following suit (you can expect to see it on September 3 instead).
Paramount has now confirmed this schedule will continue for the entire duration of the 10-episode season, meaning we can now expect the (surely explosive) season finale on November 26.
Initially, the studio hadn't given a reason why, or at least it hadn't publicly. With influential figures in the US Government blasting South Park's parodies on a near-daily basis, I'd already guessed that this could feed into why episodes were taking longer, especially given the Paramount+ exclusive post-credit scenes we're starting to see.
President Trump has been naked in bed with the devil, US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has shot puppies at point blank range, and Towelie's trip to Washington D.C. shone a spotlight on the city's National Guard deployment.
But ahead of South Park season 27 episode 4, we've finally got an explanation – and as it turns out, there are multiple reasons why we're seeing a lag on the launches.
Not only does it feel like a smart move, I also think it's a huge positive. The creators show no signs of slowing down their scathing political parodies, so some breathing space between them could do us all the world of good.
"So much happens right now in just one day with Trump"Stan, Eric and Kenny will be on our screens until the end of November. (Image credit: Paramount)According to an interview with Deadline, the season 27 delays initially started with timing episode 2 to release in line with the show's 25th anniversary. Afterwards, a two-week schedule was continued in order to make sure episodes were completely up to date with real-world events.
Deadline's source close to the South Park producers explained, “What they’re doing means this year’s episodes need more time than usual to put together, to finish.
“So much happens right now in just one day with Trump. No one’s going to sacrifice getting it right, even if we have to push getting it to air, and if that makes the season longer, so be it.”
In short, this means that everything is taking more time to make, which isn't surprising in a world with a news cycle that moves at breakneck speed.
What's perhaps more surprising is that Paramount is totally fine with the changes. “We’re not going to argue with what’s working, ” an insider at the studio added. “The numbers are great, the show is getting a lot of attention – if they want to give us a 20-week season for 10-episodes, that’s OK.”
Deadline previously reported that the second episode of Season 27 drew 6.2 million global multi-platform viewers across Comedy Central and Paramount+ in its first three days, numbers which largely came from streaming. Clearly, taking more time is working for everyone, and perhaps this allows creators to cut even deeper with their political parody.
Could this change how comedies, or any streamable series, are released in the future? Very possibly. But for now, there's a certain relief that comes with the empty space between the animated poundings.
With Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna now the latest to clap back at her South Park depiction, the new schedule will likely cool any political jets before anything gets messier than the tension and legal threats we saw through its two-year hiatus.
You might also like- Beth Dutton and Rip Wheeler spin-off: Everything we know about the sequel series to Yellowstone on Paramount+
- Mayor of Kingstown season 4: everything we know so far about the hit Paramount+ show's return
- New Paramount+ series Avatar: Seven Havens will succeed where the Last Airbender live-action adaptation couldn't, and that should make Netflix panic
- ReMarkable is teasing a new product launch for September 3
- It could be a more portable e-paper tablet
- We've had three ReMarkable tablets launch so far
We've had three generations of the ReMarkable tablet so far, but there's apparently another one on the way – and all the indications are that we're going to see an e-paper device with a smaller form factor.
ReMarkable has posted a teaser clip advertising a special event for September 3, at 8am ET (that's 5am PT / 1pm BST / 10pm AEST), and a new product launch looks likely.
Based on the very brief glimpse we get of a tablet, and the tagline "something is on the move", it seems portability is being prioritized this time around. It makes sense that ReMarkable might want to release a more pocket-friendly version of its E Ink device.
There are also hints about thicker bezels and color support here, although it's difficult to be certain from such a brief series of shots. If you want to join in with the speculation ahead of Wednesday, head to this Reddit thread.
What I want to seeHaving used the ReMarkable 2 extensively, I'm pleased to see that another tablet is on the way from the company: ReMarkable's products have always been reliable and well made, and I think a more portable digital notebook is a good idea.
In terms of what I want to see from the ReMarkable Pocket (or whatever it's called), I think a strong selection of cases is a must: a variety of options for keeping the device well protected on the move, and which offers somewhere to stow the stylus.
Something else I'd really like to see is support for certain third-party note-taking apps. I use Google Keep to organize much of my life, and it would be great to be able bring these notes up on screen, in addition to the existing Google Drive support.
Finally, this might be wishful thinking, but I'd love to see a price as low as ReMarkable can get it. The latest ReMarkable Paper Pro starts at $579 / £559 / AU$929, which is relatively steep, and a more affordable option in a smaller form factor would be most welcome.
You might also like- Final Fantasy 14's director, Naoki Yoshida, has shared a statement regarding mods that may "infringe" on other players' enjoyment and the core game
- Yoshida says he has no issue with mods but wants players to be aware of the rules
- He also said sharing the use of NSFW mods online could lead to the game being subject to legal measures by regulators in certain countries
Final Fantasy 14's director, Naoki Yoshida, has issued a warning about the continued use of mods that may "infringe" on other players and also lead to legal troubles.
Last week, it was reported that one of Final Fantasy 14's most popular mods was shut down due to a "legal enquiry". The mod, named Mare Synchronos, was a plug-in that allowed users to sync and view other players' mods in-game, like character customization add-ons.
News of the mod's takedown wasn't received well by users, which later led to the game being review-bombed on Steam.
Now, in a new Final Fantasy 14 blog post, Yoshida has responded to the overall matter of mods, stating that though he "tolerates" the personal use of them and understands that modding culture is "rooted in good intentions", he wants players to be aware of the importance of the game's user agreement.
"In the past twenty or so years, I've seen numerous positive examples of games with fan-made mods that expand upon existing gameplay," Yoshida said. "However, these mods are generally created with a vital premise in mind: they are for personal use only, and the individual player is responsible for the mods they use.
"Furthermore, the mods must not impact the core game, its services, or the intended game design in a negative manner. I personally feel that these rules should be followed by all mod creators and users."
The director adds that if players continue to uphold these rules to enhance their personal enjoyment of the game, he personally sees no reason to track them down or investigate gamers for their use of mods.
He also stressed the importance of two rules in particular: that the mods don't "infringe upon others" and they "do not negatively impact the core game, its services, or intended game design, as mentioned above."
Yoshida continued by offering a lengthy list of examples where mods may infringe on others and impact intended game design, including a scenario where a player may use mods to bypass certain conditions to obtain in-game items, like Ultimate Raid loot.
The director explained that this wouldn't be an issue if it were for personal enjoyment; however, showcasing the loot that wasn't earned through participation to other players in-game would be against the rules and would result in the mod's take down.
"In response, our only options would be to ask that players cease using the mod, or to request that the mod creator removes the functionality causing the problem," Yoshida said. "Of course, we could also implement preventative measures in-game, but this would divert programming resources from other areas, potentially damaging the enjoyment of other players in the long run."
(Image credit: Square Enix)Similarly, Yoshida said that this would also apply to FFXIV Online Store items that have not been purchased but modded, suggesting it would be unfair to players who have spent real money.
"Some may say that Square Enix is to blame for trying to make money by demanding that players spend extra on optional items," he said. "We operate our servers and data centers twenty-four hours a day, three-hundred-sixty-five days a year with the hope that our players can enjoy a reliable gaming experience. Currently, global inflation is taking its toll at a rapid pace, driving up server electricity costs, the cost of land, and even the price of servers themselves.
"We do not want to increase subscription fees for players, if at all possible--but keeping our game running requires sufficient income. If we start creating a deficit, FFXIV may no longer be able to operate. This is an example of damage dealt to the services we provide."
Finally, Yoshida touched on the matter of NSFW mods, reiterating that if a player decides to mod their character to appear naked, it might fall into the category of personal use and responsibility, but if the user shares screenshots online, "FFXIV itself may be subject to legal measures by regulators in certain countries."
"Laws that regulate the content of video games grow stricter by the year," he said. "These laws are there to protect minors and for a variety of other reasons, but the fact remains that they are tangibly becoming stricter. We have a duty to provide our services in adherence to the laws of all countries where FFXIV is available, and if we are unable to do so, the distribution of our game can be prohibited. This is another example of damage dealt to our services."
The director added that he does not intend for his examples to be a censure on mod users or creators, but asks that players respect the game by enjoying it within the confines of basic rules.
You might also like...- Final Fantasy 14 director has a pretty simple explanation for why the Monster Hunter Wilds collab will feature Omega – 'In the Monster Hunter team, there are many Warriors of Light'
- Here are the three biggest things we learned from the Hollow Knight: Silksong release date trailer
- Everything announced at Gamescom Opening Night Live 2025 from the Sekiro anime to the new Ghost of Yotei mode
- Windows Backup for Organizations launches with a unique twist
- It keeps your Windows settings and a list of your apps
- Disk imaging, file copies and disaster recovery aren’t included
Microsoft has been busy lately adding new features to Windows for business users, but its latest release, Windows Backup for Organizations, is a bit of a misnomer, as it doesn’t actually back up your data.
A new company blog announced the general availability of Windows Backup for Organizations, designed for Windows 10 or 11 Entra joined devices.
However, it’s not a full device backup so disk imaging, file copies or disaster recovery are not covered by the new tool.
Windows Backup for Organizations isn’t quite a full backup toolThe core functionality of the tool is backing up Windows settings and keeping a list of installed Microsoft Store apps. It’ll also restore settings and apps to the Start Menu on Windows 11 (22H2 or later).
Writing in the launch post, Microsoft Product Manager Miranda Leschke noted how it can help admins with resetting or migrating devices, and will support a smooth transition between Windows 10 and 11 – something many organizations have delayed, but an imminent task for many with the impending October 14, 2025 Windows 10 end of life deadline drawing nearer.
Windows 10 22H2 only works for backups, but Windows 11 22H2+ will work with backup and restore. Microsoft’s decision not to include restoration capabilities on its soon-to-be deprecated OS is another notable push towards Windows 11.
Disabled by default, IT admins must configure Backup and Restore policies for Windows Backup for Organizations.
From the point of restoration using the new tool, the remaining Out of the Box Experience (OOBE) is the same. After the OOBE is completed, user profiles and preferences will be automatically restored.
You might also like- Microsoft may have just saved admins a whole of work (and stress) when it comes to installing vital upgrades
- Fancy an upgrade? These are the best mobile workstations and best business laptops
- We’ve ranked the best cloud backup platforms
- Xbox Insider Program members with an Xbox Game Pass Core or Standard subscription can now access Cloud Gaming at no extra cost
- This includes the ability to play a number of games included with the subscription service
- Users can also access select games that they already own
Members of the Xbox Insider program with an Xbox Game Pass Core or Standard membership can now try Xbox Cloud Gaming at no extra cost.
This includes access to a number of titles that are already included with those tiers of the subscription service, plus select games that they already own.
The list of supported games spans massive recent releases like Assassin's Creed Shadows and Black Myth: Wukong to indie favorites such as Dredge and Darkest Dungeon. There's a good range, and more ways to play the titles that you already own can only be a good thing.
In order to access the games, you simply need to sign in to Xbox Cloud Gaming on a supported device and select the title that you want to play.
Of course, you will need an active Xbox Game Pass Core or Standard subscription, and be part of the Xbox Insider Program.
If you're not yet part of the Xbox Insider Program, you can get started by downloading the Xbox Insider Hub app on your Xbox console or PC.
We expect these Xbox Insider features to start rolling out to other users in the coming months.
You might also like...- Warhammer: 40,000 - Dawn of War 4 looks like a return to the glory days of the original real-time strategy game
- Pragmata is part puzzle game, part sci-fi shooter, and all a surprising amount of fun
- Who needs Asus' fancy flagship monitor? This dual-mode OLED screen stole the show and my heart at Gamescom 2025 – and it's perfect for PC and PS5 setups
- Avaya reportedly offers voluntary exit program to all employees
- A new CEO has been at the helm since 2024, leading the transformation
- Avaya criticized for missing early trends and weak execution
Avaya is reportedly offering voluntary exit packages to all employees as it becomes the latest tech firm looking to save money by reducing staffing costs.
The move is aimed at shedding “a lot of employees,” an unnamed source told CX Today, which was declined a comment by Avaya.
The news comes around a year after former Avaya CEO Alan Masarek announced his retirement, with Patrick Dennis stepping up as CEO very nearly a full year ago.
Avaya looks to shed “a lot of employees”Dennis set out a plan for Avaya to achieve “long-term” success when he took on the role, which coincided with the company’s second bankruptcy in five years (via CX Today).
Layoffs at the company started in North America, but by early 2025 they had spread globally. Countries in Europe and the Middle East have been left with minimal staff, with Avaya also shutting the doors on its offices and asking workers to work from home.
With the company emerging from its second bankruptcy and enacting repeated restructuring cycles, analysts are worried about Avaya’s long-term future.
Avaya has already conducted three major rounds of post-pandemic layoffs – two in the second half of 2024, and one at the beginning of 2023.
Its history also taints current performance, with the company having missed some early cloud trends like UCaaS. CX Today criticized Avaya for “missing early market signals, [having] weak execution and late timing,” leading to the rise of RingCentral, Verint and Zoom.
Zoom and RingCentral have undergone similar staffing changes in recent years, but they’ve managed to stay ahead of the market – Zoom in particular has reinvented itself as an AI-first productivity platform.
TechRadar Pro has contacted Avaya for comment.
You might also like- Oracle cuts hundreds of jobs as AI push continues
- We’ve listed the best video conferencing software on offer
- Check out the best online collaboration tools around right now
- Slated for release on Apple TV+ in 2026
- Adapted from William Gibson's 1984 cyberpunk novel
- Created for TV by Graham Roland and JD Dillard
- Comprised of 10 episodes
- No trailer yet, only a brief teaser announcing production start
The Neuromancer TV series is finally surging onto the small screen courtesy of those sci-fi loving folks at Apple TV+ and we're all amped!
Based on the Hugo and Nebula Award-winning sci-fi legend Willian Gibson's 1984 cyberpunk novel, Neuromancer, Apple TV+ is adding another jewel in its enviable crown of science fiction shows that includes Foundation, Silo, Invasion, Murderbot, Dark Matter, and For All Mankind.
Originally announced back in February of 2024 as an episodic series greenlit for pre-production development, Neuromancer is a seminal work of remarkable imagination that launched the sub-genre of cyberpunk and coined modern computer slang like "hacker" and “jacked in.” It’s been copied, imitated, and cannibalized over the decades as filmmakers tried in vain to adapt the novel for film or TV and rescue it from development hell.
Now it seems that Apple TV+ has found just the right formula and the show has entered full production as of this summer. So what's all the fuss about Neuromancer, what’s it about, and why does it remain one of the five most influential sci-fi books of the late 20th century? Let’s dodge the ICE, cowboy, and dissect this upcoming computer-driven dystopian series!
Is there a release date for Neuromancer?A post shared by Benedict Spence BSC (@benedict_spence_dop)
A photo posted by on
Apple TV+’s Neuromancer is expected to air sometime in late 2026. The show was officially announced to be in full production beginning on July 1, 2025, which was the 41st anniversary of the publication of Gibson's book. Filming is already underway in Tokyo, Los Angeles, Istanbul, Canada, and London and is expected to wrap around the end of the year if all goes well.
That sets up Neuromancer for a potential fall or winter release next year!
Are there any teasers or trailers for Neuromancer?At this time there's really only been one slightly cryptic teaser announcing the start of filming in July, which we must say is rather fitting for cult fans of the super-slick novel. In the video, a shadowy bar comes to life, with lights buzzing and pinball machines dinging as a blue-and-orange neon sign blinks awake spelling out Bar Chatsubo, the Chiba City lounge familiar to readers. It then announces that the series is now officially in production.
Who is cast in Apple TV+’s Neuromancer?Watch for Apple TV+'s Neuromancer series in 2026 (Image credit: Apple TV+)Neuromancer will be created for TV by Graham Roland (Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan, Dark Winds) and JD Dillard (Devotion, The Outsider, Sleight). It’s a 10-episode co-production inked in a collaboration between Skydance Television and Anonymous Content that will also be produced by Drake's own production shingle, DreamCrew Entertainment, with Roland acting as showrunner and Dillard aboard to direct at least the pilot episode.
"We're incredibly excited to be bringing this iconic property to Apple TV+," creators and executive producers Roland and Dillard announced in a statement. "Since we became friends nearly 10 years ago, we've looked for something to team up on, so this collaboration marks a dream come true. Neuromancer has inspired so much of the science fiction that's come after it and we’re looking forward to bringing television audiences into Gibson’s definitive 'cyberpunk' world."
So far, the following actors have been reportedly cast in the Neuromancer series:
- Callum Turner as Case
- Brianna Middleton as Molly
- Mark Strong as Armitage
- Joseph Lee as Hideo
- Clémence Poésy as Marie-France Tessier
- Peter Sarsgaard as John Ashpool
- Emma Laird as Linda Lee
- Max Irons as Jean Tessier-Ashpool
- Dane DeHaan as Peter Riviera
First off, be warned. Neuromancer is no casual beach read while sipping a White Claw and requires a certain level of concentration, memory, and ability to absorb rapid-fire, machine-gun waves of slang terms and hacker jargon. There’s a definite lack of satisfying explanations for some events, and the narrative demands your rapt attention. But the tone and pacing is totally exhilarating and takes your breath away if you can hang on!
Secondly, up until now nearly every film attempting to dip into this futuristic world of neon drenched streets, gleaming glass towers and digital tech conspiracies has not performed well at the box office. And that not only includes Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner, but also the James Cameron co-written Strange Days, and Johnny Mnemonic, which actually had its screenplay penned by William Gibson. It wasn’t until The Wachowskis helmed The Matrix in 1999 that folks got serious about cyberpunk again.
According to Apple TV+, the series will follow a burnt-out, psychologically damaged, elite super-hacker named Case who is reluctantly shoved into a tangled web of digital espionage and high stakes crime with his partner Molly after embezzling cash from a boss. She’s a cybernetically-enhanced "razor-girl" assassin with mirrored eyes dreaming of pulling off a daring heist on a dangerous corporate dynasty harboring secrets and she needs Case to join the gig.
Her client is Armitage, a clandestine former military agent with more than a few skeletons in his closet. Their target is a sophisticated AI called Wintermute, but things go sideways and the pair soon find themselves scrambling for their lives before they encounter its mysterious AI counterpart, Neuromancer. It’s set in a dark depressing world of corporate globalization and a data-frenzied society not unlike today.
You might also like